Movement of abdominal structures on magnetic resonance imaging during positioning changes related to lateral lumbar spine surgery: a morphometric study

Clinical article

View More View Less
  • Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

The minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion of the lumbar spine through a retroperitoneal transpsoas approach has become increasingly used. Although preoperative imaging is performed supine, the procedure is performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The authors measured the changes in location of the psoas muscle, aorta, inferior vena cava (IVC), iliac vessels, and kidneys with regard to the fixed lumbar spine when moving from a supine to a lateral decubitus position.

Methods

Unenhanced lumbar MRI scans were performed using a 3T magnet in 10 skeletally mature volunteers in the supine, left lateral decubitus (LLD), and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions. Positional changes in the aorta, IVC, iliac vessels, and kidneys were then analyzed at all lumbar levels when moving from supine to RLD and supine to LLD. Values are presented as group means.

Results

When the position was changed from supine to RLD, both the aorta and the IVC moved up to 6 mm to the right, with increased movement caudally at L3–4. The aorta was displaced 2 mm anteriorly at L1–2, and the IVC moved 3 mm anteriorly at L1–2 and L2–3 and 1 mm posteriorly at L3–4. The left kidney moved 22 mm anteriorly and 15 mm caudally, while the right kidney moved 9 mm rostrally.

When the position was changed from supine to LLD, the aorta moved 1.5 mm to the left at all levels, with very minimal anterior/posterior displacement. The IVC moved up to 10 mm to the left and 12 mm anteriorly, with increased movement rostrally at L1–2. The left kidney moved 3 mm anteriorly and 1 mm rostrally, while the right kidney moved 20 mm anteriorly and 5 mm caudally.

The bifurcation of the aorta was an average of 18 mm above the L4–5 disc space, while the convergence of the iliac veins to form the IVC was at the level of the disc space. The iliopsoas did not move in any quantifiable direction when the position was changed from supine to lateral; its shape, however, may change to become more flat or rounded. When the position was changed from supine to RLD, the right iliac vein moved posteriorly an average of 1.5 mm behind the anterior vertebral body (VB) line (a horizontal line drawn on an axial image at the anterior VB), while the other vessels stayed predominantly anterior to the disc space. When the position was changed from supine to LLD, the right iliac vein moved to a position 1.4 mm anterior to the anterior VB line. There was negligible movement of the other vessels in this position.

Conclusions

The authors showed that the aorta, IVC, and kidneys moved a significant distance away from the surgical corridor with changes in position. At the L4–5 level, a left-sided approach may be riskier because the right common iliac vein trends posteriorly and into the surgical corridor, whereas in a right-sided approach it trends anteriorly.

Abbreviations used in this paper:DICOM = Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine; IVC = inferior vena cava; LIF = lateral interbody fusion; LLD = left lateral decubitus; RLD = right lateral decubitus; VB = vertebral body.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Armen R. Deukmedjian, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, 2 Tampa General Circle, 7th Floor, Tampa, Florida 33606. email: armendeuk@gmail.com.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online March 30, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.3.SPINE1210.

  • 1

    Baniel J, , Foster RS, & Donohue JP: Surgical anatomy of the lumbar vessels: implications for retroperitoneal surgery. J Urol 153:14221425, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Brier-Jones JE, , Palmer DK, , Ĭnceoğlu S, & Cheng WK: Vertebral body fractures after transpsoas interbody fusion procedures. Spine J 11:10681072, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Chhabra A, , Andreisek G, , Soldatos T, , Wang KC, , Flammang AJ, & Belzberg AJ, : MR neurography: past, present, and future. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:583591, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Dakwar E, , Le TV, , Baaj AA, , Le AX, , Smith WD, & Akbarnia BA, : Abdominal wall paresis as a complication of minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 31:4 E18, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Dakwar E, , Vale FL, & Uribe JS: Trajectory of the main sensory and motor branches of the lumbar plexus outside the psoas muscle related to the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 14:290295, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Galloway GM: Direct lateral transpsoas approach to interbody fusion—may be risky after all. J Clin Neurophysiol 28:605606, 2011

  • 7

    Garg J, , Woo K, , Hirsch J, , Bruffey JD, & Dilley RB: Vascular complications of exposure for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Vasc Surg 51:946950, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Guérin P, , Obeid I, , Gille O, , Bourghli A, , Luc S, & Pointillart V, : Safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: a morphometric study. Surg Radiol Anat 33:665671, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Houten JK, , Alexandre LC, , Nasser R, & Wollowick AL: Nerve injury during the transpsoas approach for lumbar fusion. Report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 15:280284, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Hu WK, , He SS, , Zhang SC, , Liu YB, , Li M, & Hou TS, : An MRI study of psoas major and abdominal large vessels with respect to the X/DLIF approach. Eur Spine J 20:557562, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hyun SJ, , Kim YB, , Kim YS, , Park SW, , Nam TK, & Hong HJ, : Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle volume: comparison between paramedian interfascial and midline approaches for lumbar fusion. J Korean Med Sci 22:646651, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Karikari IO, , Nimjee SM, , Hardin CA, , Hughes BD, , Hodges TR, & Mehta AI, : Extreme lateral interbody fusion approach for isolated thoracic and thoracolumbar spine diseases: initial clinical experience and early outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:368375, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Kepler CK, , Bogner EA, , Herzog RJ, & Huang RC: Anatomy of the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus with respect to the surgical approach for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20:550556, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Laws CJ, , Coughlin DG, , Lotz JC, , Serhan HA, & Hu SS: Direct lateral approach to lumbar fusion is a biomechanically equivalent alternative to the anterior approach: an in vitro study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [epub ahead of print] 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Lehman RA Jr, & Kang DG: Commentary. An increasing awareness of the complications after transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion procedure. Spine J 11:10731075, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Lolis E, , Panagouli E, & Venieratos D: Study of the ascending lumbar and iliolumbar veins: surgical anatomy, clinical implications and review of the literature. Ann Anat 193:516529, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Mirilas P, & Skandalakis JE: Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneal spaces, Part III: Retroperitoneal blood vessels and lymphatics. Am Surg 76:139144, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Mirilas P, & Skandalakis JE: Surgical anatomy of the retroperitoneal spaces, Part V: Surgical applications and complications. Am Surg 76:358364, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Moller DJ, , Slimack NP, , Acosta FL Jr, , Koski TR, , Fessler RG, & Liu JC: Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity. Neurosurg Focus 31:4 E4, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Oliveira L, , Marchi L, , Coutinho E, & Pimenta L: A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:26 Suppl S331S337, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Ozgur BM, , Aryan HE, , Pimenta L, & Taylor WR: Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435443, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Plante E, & Turkstra L: Sources of error in the quantitative analysis of MRI scans. Magn Reson Imaging 9:589595, 1991

  • 23

    Pumberger M, , Hughes AP, , Huang RR, , Sama AA, , Cammisa FP, & Girardi FP: Neurologic deficit following lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J [epub ahead of print] 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Rodgers WB, , Gerber EJ, & Patterson J: Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:2632, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Smith WD, , Dakwar E, , Le TV, , Christian G, , Serrano S, & Uribe JS: Minimally invasive surgery for traumatic spinal pathologies: a mini-open, lateral approach in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:26 Suppl S338S346, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Smith WD, , Youssef JA, , Christian G, , Serrano S, & Hyde JA: Lumbarized sacrum as a relative contraindication for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion at L5–6. J Spinal Disord Tech [epub ahead of print] 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Than KD, , Wang AC, , Rahman SU, , Wilson TJ, , Valdivia JM, & Park P, : Complication avoidance and management in anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 31:4 E6, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Uribe JS, , Arredondo N, , Dakwar E, & Vale FL: Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 13:260266, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Uribe JS, , Dakwar E, , Cardona RF, & Vale FL: Minimally invasive lateral retropleural thoracolumbar approach: cadaveric feasibility study and report of 4 clinical cases. Neurosurgery 68:1 Suppl Operative 3239, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Uribe JS, , Dakwar E, , Le TV, , Christian G, , Serrano S, & Smith WD: Minimally invasive surgery treatment for thoracic spine tumor removal: a mini-open, lateral approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:26 Suppl S347S354, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Uribe JS, , Vale FL, & Dakwar E: Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:26 Suppl S368S374, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Wood KB, , Devine J, , Fischer D, , Dettori JR, & Janssen M: Vascular injury in elective anterior lumbosacral surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:9 Suppl S66S75, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 359 170 6
Full Text Views 147 32 3
PDF Downloads 174 34 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0