Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults

A review

Restricted access

Sagittal spinal misalignment (SSM) is an established cause of pain and disability. Treating physicians must be familiar with the radiographic findings consistent with SSM. Additionally, the restoration or maintenance of physiological sagittal spinal alignment after reconstructive spinal procedures is imperative to achieve good clinical outcomes. The C-7 plumb line (sagittal vertical axis) has traditionally been used to evaluate sagittal spinal alignment; however, recent data indicate that the measurement of spinopelvic parameters provides a more comprehensive assessment of sagittal spinal alignment. In this review the authors describe the proper analysis of spinopelvic alignment for surgical planning. Online videos supplement the text to better illustrate the key concepts.

Abbreviations used in this paper:CA = coronal alignment; CSVL = central sacral vertical line; HRQOL = health-related quality of life; LL = lumbar lordosis; PI = pelvic incidence; PSO = pedicle subtraction osteotomy; PT = pelvic tilt; SA = sagittal alignment; SPI = spinopelvic inclination; SS = sacral slope; SSM = sagittal spinal misalignment; SVA = sagittal vertical axis; TK = thoracic kyphosis; TLK = thoracolumbar kyphosis.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Christopher P. Ames, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Medical Center, 400 Parnassus Avenue, A850, San Francisco, California 94143. email: amesc@neurosurg.ucsf.edu.Please include this information when citing this paper: published online March 23, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.2.SPINE11320.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Barrey CJund JNoseda ORoussouly P: Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases. Eur Spine J 16:145914672007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Boulay CTardieu CHecquet JBenaim CMouilleseaux BMarty C: Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15:4154222006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Dubousset JImportance de la vertèbre pelvienne dans l'équilibre rachidien. Application à la chirurgie de la colonne vertébrale chez l'enfant et l'adolescent. Villeneuve P: Pied Équilibre et Rachis ParisFrison-Roche1998. 141149

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Dubousset J: Reflections of an orthopaedic surgeon on patient care and research into the condition of scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 31:1 SupplS1S82011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Dubousset JThree-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity. Weinstein SL: The Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice New YorkRaven Press1994. 479496

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Duval KLam TSanderson D: The mechanical relationship between the rearfoot, pelvis and low-back. Gait Posture 32:6376402010

  • 7

    Gelb DELenke LGBridwell KHBlanke KMcEnery KW: An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:135113581995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Glassman SDBerven SBridwell KHorton WDimar JR: Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:6826882005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Glassman SDBridwell KDimar JRHorton WBerven SSchwab F: The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:202420292005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Gottfried ONDaubs MDPatel AADailey ATBrodke DS: Spinopelvic parameters in postfusion flatback deformity patients. Spine J 9:6396472009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hardacker JWShuford RFCapicotto PNPryor PW: Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:147214801997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Hori TKawaguchi YKimura T: How does the ossification area of the posterior longitudinal ligament progress after cervical laminoplasty?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:280728122006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Hu SHRodriguez JPFarin AHseigh PO'Shaughnessy BAShaffrey CI: Restoration of Global Sagittal Balance with Thoracolumbar Osteotomy Results in Spontaneous Correction of Cervical Alignment in Patients who Maintain Horizontal Gaze. Presented at the 38th annual meeting of the Cervical Spine Research SocietyCharlotte, NC2010. (http://www.medicine.virginia.edu/clinical/departments/neurosurgery/residenttraining/lectures-presentations.html) [Accessed February 17 2012]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Jackson RPPeterson MDMcManus ACHales C: Compensatory spinopelvic balance over the hip axis and better reliability in measuring lordosis to the pelvic radius on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers and patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:175017671998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Janssen MMDrevelle XHumbert LSkalli WCastelein RM: Differences in male and female spino-pelvic alignment in asymptomatic young adults: a three-dimensional analysis using upright low-dose digital biplanar x-rays. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E826E8322009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Kim KTPark KJLee JH: Osteotomy of the spine to correct the spinal deformity. Asian Spine J 3:1131232009

  • 17

    Kim YJBridwell KHLenke LGRhim SCheh G: An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:234323522006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Labelle HRoussouly PBerthonnaud EDimnet JO'Brien M: The importance of spino-pelvic balance in L5–S1 developmental spondylolisthesis: a review of pertinent radiologic measurements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:S27S342005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Labelle HRoussouly PChopin DBerthonnaud EHresko TO'Brien M: Spino-pelvic alignment after surgical correction for developmental spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 17:117011762008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Lafage VAmes CSchwab FKlineberg EAkbarnia BSmith J: Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment following lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E180E1872012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Lafage VBharucha NJSchwab FHart RABurton DBoachie-Adjei O: Multicenter validation of a formula predicting postoperative spinopelvic alignment. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 16:15212012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Lafage VSchwab FPatel AHawkinson NFarcy J: A validated formula for predicting post operative sagittal balance in the setting of adult spinal deformity. Scoliosis Research Society 43rd Annual MeetingSalt Lake City, UT2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Lafage VSchwab FPatel AHawkinson NFarcy JP: Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E599E6062009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Lafage VSchwab FSkalli WHawkinson NGagey PMOndra S: Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:157215782008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Lafage VSchwab FVira SHart RBurton DSmith JS: Does vertebral level of pedicle subtraction osteotomy correlate with degree of spinopelvic parameter correction? Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 14:1841912011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Lafage VSchwab FVira SPatel AUngar BFarcy JP: Spino-pelvic parameters following surgery can be predicted: a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:103710452011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Lazennec JYRamaré SArafati NLaudet CGGorin MRoger B: Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9:47552000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Lee CSLee CKKim YTHong YMYoo JH: Dynamic sagittal imbalance of the spine in degenerative flat back: significance of pelvic tilt in surgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:202920352001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Legaye JDuval-Beaupère GHecquet JMarty C: Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:991031998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Legaye JHecquet JMarty CDuval-Beaupere G: Equilibre sagittal du rachis. Relations entre bassin et courbures rachidiennes sagittales en position debout. Rachis 5:2152261993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Mac-Thiong JMLabelle HBerthonnaud EBetz RRRoussouly P: Sagittal spinopelvic balance in normal children and adolescents. Eur Spine J 16:2272342007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    O'Brien MFKuklo TRBlanke KMLenke LG: Spinal Deformity Study Group Radiographic Measurement Manual Memphis, TNMedtronic Sofamor Danek2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Ondra SLMarzouk SKoski TSilva FSalehi S: Mathematical calculation of pedicle subtraction osteotomy size to allow precision correction of fixed sagittal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E973E9792006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Rajnics PTemplier ASkalli WLavaste FIlles T: The importance of spinopelvic parameters in patients with lumbar disc lesions. Int Orthop 26:1041082002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Rose PSBridwell KHLenke LGCronen GAMulconrey DSBuchowski JM: Role of pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, and patient factors on sagittal plane correction following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:7857912009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Roussouly PGollogly SBerthonnaud EDimnet J: Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:3463532005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Roussouly PNnadi C: Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J 19:182418362010

  • 38

    Sarwahi VBoachie-Adjei OBackus SITaira G: Characterization of gait function in patients with postsurgical sagittal (flatback) deformity: a prospective study of 21 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:232823372002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Schwab FFarcy JPBridwell KBerven SGlassman SHarrast J: A clinical impact classification of scoliosis in the adult. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:210921142006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Schwab FLafage VBoyce RSkalli WFarcy JP: Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E959E9672006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Schwab FLafage VPatel AFarcy JP: Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:182818332009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Schwab FLafage VShaffrey CIFarcy JPBoachie-Adjei OShelekov A: Pre-operative pelvic parameters must be considered to achieve adequate sagittal balance after lumbar osteotomy. Presented at the 18th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, Scoliosis Research SocietyCopenhagen, Denmark2011. (http://www.srs.org/imast/2011/) [Accessed February 17 2012]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Schwab FPatel AUngar BFarcy JPLafage V: Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:222422312010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Schwab FJPatel AShaffrey CISmith JSFarcy JPBoachie-Adjei O: Sagittal realignment failures following pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery: are we doing enough? Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine [in press]2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Smith JSBess SShaffrey CIBurton DCHart RAHostin R: Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [epub ahead of print]2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46

    Smith JSShaffrey CIBerven SGlassman SHamill CHorton W: Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis. Neurosurgery 65:86942009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47

    Tanguay FMac-Thiong JMde Guise JALabelle H: Relation between the sagittal pelvic and lumbar spine geometries following surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a preliminary study. Stud Health Technol Inform 123:2993022006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48

    Vedantam RLenke LGKeeney JABridwell KH: Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:2112151998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Cited By
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 807 734 55
Full Text Views 437 311 22
PDF Downloads 421 295 22
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar