Perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on 302 patients from the AOSpine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study

Presented at the 2011 Spine Section Meeting 

Restricted access

Object

Rates of complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) are not clear. Appreciating these risks is important for patient counseling and quality improvement. The authors sought to assess the rates of and risk factors associated with perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of CSM.

Methods

Data from the AOSpine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study, a prospective, multicenter study, were analyzed. Outcomes data, including adverse events, were collected in a standardized manner and externally monitored. Rates of perioperative complications (within 30 days of surgery) and delayed complications (31 days to 2 years following surgery) were tabulated and stratified based on clinical factors.

Results

The study enrolled 302 patients (mean age 57 years, range 29–86) years. Of 332 reported adverse events, 73 were classified as perioperative complications (25 major and 48 minor) in 47 patients (overall perioperative complication rate of 15.6%). The most common perioperative complications included minor cardiopulmonary events (3.0%), dysphagia (3.0%), and superficial wound infection (2.3%). Perioperative worsening of myelopathy was reported in 4 patients (1.3%). Based on 275 patients who completed 2 years of follow-up, there were 14 delayed complications (8 minor, 6 major) in 12 patients, for an overall delayed complication rate of 4.4%. Of patients treated with anterior-only (n = 176), posterior-only (n = 107), and combined anterior-posterior (n = 19) procedures, 11%, 19%, and 37%, respectively, had 1 or more perioperative complications. Compared with anterior-only approaches, posterior-only approaches had a higher rate of wound infection (0.6% vs 4.7%, p = 0.030). Dysphagia was more common with combined anterior-posterior procedures (21.1%) compared with anterior-only procedures (2.3%) or posterior-only procedures (0.9%) (p < 0.001). The incidence of C-5 radiculopathy was not associated with the surgical approach (p = 0.8). The occurrence of perioperative complications was associated with increased age (p = 0.006), combined anterior-posterior procedures (p = 0.016), increased operative time (p = 0.009), and increased operative blood loss (p = 0.005), but it was not associated with comorbidity score, body mass index, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, smoking status, anterior-only versus posterior-only approach, or specific procedures. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with minor or major complications identified age (OR 1.029, 95% CI 1.002–1.057, p = 0.035) and operative time (OR 1.005, 95% CI 1.002–1.008, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis of factors associated with major complications identified age (OR 1.054, 95% CI 1.015–1.094, p = 0.006) and combined anterior-posterior procedures (OR 5.297, 95% CI 1.626–17.256, p = 0.006).

Conclusions

For the surgical treatment of CSM, the vast majority of complications were treatable and without long-term impact. Multivariate factors associated with an increased risk of complications include greater age, increased operative time, and use of combined anterior-posterior procedures.

Abbreviations used in this paper:BMI = body mass index; CSM = cervical spondylotic myelopathy; mJOA = modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Justin S. Smith, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, PO Box 800212, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908. email: jss7f@virginia.edu.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online February 10, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11467.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

References

  • 1

    Bapat MRChaudhary KSharma ALaheri V: Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases. Eur Spine J 17:165116632008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Bilbao GDuart MAurrecoechea JJPomposo IIgartua ACatalán G: Surgical results and complications in a series of 71 consecutive cervical spondylotic corpectomies. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152:115511632010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Boakye MPatil CGSantarelli JHo CTian WLad SP: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: complications and outcomes after spinal fusion. Neurosurgery 62:4554622008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Casha SEngelbrecht HADuPlessis SJHurlbert RJ: Suspended laminoplasty for wide posterior cervical decompression and intradural access: results, advantages, and complications. J Neurosurg Spine 1:80862004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Cauthen JCKinard REVogler JBJackson DEDePaz OBHunter OL: Outcome analysis of noninstrumented anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion in 348 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1881921998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Cunningham MRHershman SBendo J: Systematic review of cohort studies comparing surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:5375432010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Edwards CC IIHeller JGMurakami H: Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:116811752002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Edwards CC IIHeller JGSilcox DH III: T-Saw laminoplasty for the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: clinical and radiographic outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:178817942000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Fehlings MGKopjar BArnold PYoon TVaccaro ABrodke D: Does surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy result in long term benefit? Two year outcomes of the AO Spine North America CSM multi-center prospective study in 280 subjects. J Neurosurg 113:A402A4032010. (Abstract)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Fountas KNKapsalaki EZNikolakakos LGSmisson HFJohnston KWGrigorian AA: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:231023172007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hashimoto MMochizuki MAiba AOkawa AHayashi KSakuma T: C5 palsy following anterior decompression and spinal fusion for cervical degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 19:170217102010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Heller JGEdwards CC IIMurakami HRodts GE: Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:133013362001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Hwang SLLin CLLieu ASLee KSKuo THHwang YF: Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 1:1601672004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Ikenaga MShikata JTanaka C: Radiculopathy of C-5 after anterior decompression for cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 3:2102172005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Imagama SMatsuyama YYukawa YKawakami NKamiya MKanemura T: C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: a multicentre study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:3934002010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Kaminsky SBClark CRTraynelis VC: Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. A comparison of laminectomy and laminoplasty at five year average follow-up. Iowa Orthop J 24:951052004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Klineberg E: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review of the evidence. Orthop Clin North Am 41:1932022010

  • 18

    Kristof RAKiefer TThudium MRingel FStoffel MKovacs A: Comparison of ventral corpectomy and plate-screw-instrumented fusion with dorsal laminectomy and rod-screw-instrumented fusion for treatment of at least two vertebral-level spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Eur Spine J 18:195119562009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Naderi SAlberstone CDRupp FWBenzel ECBaldwin NG: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated with corpectomy: technique and results in 44 patients. Neurosurg Focus 1:6e51996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Nagashima HDokai THashiguchi HIshii HKameyama YKatae Y: Clinical features and surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients aged 80 years or older: a multi-center retrospective study. Eur Spine J 20:2402462011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Papadopoulos ECHuang RCGirardi FPSynnott KCammisa FP Jr: Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plate fixation: radiographic and clinical results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:8979022006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Rao RDGourab KDavid KS: Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:161916402006

  • 23

    Shen FHSamartzis DKhanna NGoldberg EJAn HS: Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcome in instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with or without direct uncovertebral joint decompression. Spine J 4:6296352004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Smith JSFu KMPolly DW JrSansur CABerven SHBroadstone PA: Complication rates of three common spine procedures and rates of thromboembolism following spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:214021492010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Smith JSShaffrey CISansur CABerven SHFu KMBroadstone PA: Rates of infection following spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity And Mortality Committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:5565632011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Spanu GMarchionni MAdinolfi DKnerich R: Complications following anterior cervical spine surgery for disc diseases: an analysis of ten years experience. Chir Organi Mov 90:2292402005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Stieber JRBrown KDonald GDCohen JD: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion with plate fixation as an outpatient procedure. Spine J 5:5035072005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Tracy JABartleson JD: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist 16:1761872010

  • 29

    Uribe JSSangala JRDuckworth EAVale FL: Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up. Eur Spine J 18:6546622009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Villavicencio ATPushchak EBurneikiene SThramann JJ: The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J 7:1481532007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Woods BIHohl JLee JDonaldson W IIIKang J: Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:6886952011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Yagi MNinomiya KKihara MHoriuchi Y: Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 12:59652010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Yang HSChen DYLu XHYang LLYan WJYuan W: Choice of surgical approach for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in combination with cervical disc hernia. Eur Spine J 19:4945012010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 215 215 21
Full Text Views 177 177 10
PDF Downloads 304 304 12
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar