Cervical decompression and reconstruction without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

The primary goal of this study was to review the immediate postoperative neurological function in patients surgically treated for symptomatic cervical spine disease without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The secondary goal was to assess the economic impact of intraoperative monitoring (IOM) in this patient population.

Methods

This study is a retrospective review of 720 consecutively treated patients who underwent cervical spine procedures. The patients were identified and the data were collected by individuals who were not involved in their care.

Results

A total of 1534 cervical spine levels were treated in 720 patients using anterior, posterior, and combined (360°) approaches. Myelopathy was present preoperatively in 308 patients. There were 185 patients with increased signal intensity within the spinal cord on preoperative T2-weighted MR images, of whom 43 patients had no clinical evidence of myelopathy. Three patients (0.4%) exhibited a new neurological deficit postoperatively. Of these patients, 1 had a preoperative diagnosis of radiculopathy, while the other 2 were treated for myelopathy. The new postoperative deficits completely resolved in all 3 patients and did not require additional treatment. The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for IOM during cervical decompression include 95925 and 95926 for somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the upper and lower extremities, respectively, as well as 95928 and 95929 for motor evoked potential monitoring of the upper and lower extremities. In addition to the charge for the baseline [monitoring] study, patients are charged hourly for ongoing electrophysiology testing and monitoring using the CPT code 95920. Based on these codes and assuming an average of 4 hours of monitoring time per surgical case, the savings realized in this group of patients was estimated to be $1,024,754.

Conclusions

With the continuing increase in health care costs, it is our responsibility as providers to minimize expenses when possible. This should be accomplished without compromising the quality of care to patients. This study demonstrates that decompression and reconstruction for symptomatic cervical spine disease without IOM may reduce the cost of treatment without adversely impacting patient safety.

Abbreviations used in this paper: ACDF = anterior cervical decompression and fusion; CPT = Current Procedural Terminology; IOM = intraoperative monitoring; MEP = motor evoked potential; SSEP = somatosensory evoked potential.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Vincent C. Traynelis, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, 1725 West Harrison, Suite 1115, Chicago, Illinois 60612. email: vincent_traynelis@rush.edu.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online November 11, 2011; DOI: 10.3171/2011.10.SPINE11199.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

References

  • 1

    Asazuma TToyama YSuzuki NFujimura YHirabayshi K: Ependymomas of the spinal cord and cauda equina: An analysis of 26 cases and a review of the literature. Spinal Cord 37:7537591999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Bose BSestokas AKSchwartz DM: Neurophysiological detection of iatrogenic C-5 nerve deficit during anterior cervical spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 6:3813852007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Bose BSestokas AKSchwartz DM: Neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during instrumented anterior cervical fusion. Spine J 4:2022072004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Bouchard JABohlman HHBiro C: Intraoperative improvements of somatosensory evoked potentials: correlation to clinical outcome in surgery for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:5895941996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Boyd SGRothwell JCCowan JMWebb PJMorley TAsselman P: A method of monitoring function in corticospinal pathways during scoliosis surgery with a note on motor conduction velocities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49:2512571986

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Costa PBruno ABonzanino MMassaro FCaruso LVincenzo I: Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring during spine and spinal cord surgery. Spinal Cord 45:86912007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Cui HLuk KDHu Y: Effects of physiological parameters on intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring: results of a multifactor analysis. Med Sci Monit 15:CR226CR2302009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Dawson GD: Cerebral responses to electrical stimulation of peripheral nerve in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 10:1341401947

  • 9

    Deletis V: Basic methodological principles of multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeries. Eur Spine J 16:Suppl 2S147S1522007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Deletis VSala F: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord during spinal cord and spine surgery: a review focus on the corticospinal tracts. Clin Neurophysiol 119:2482642008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Devlin VJAnderson PASchwartz DMVaughan R: Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: focus on cervical myelopathy and related issues. Spine J 6:6 Suppl212S224S2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Ding YHu YRuan DKChen B: Value of somatosensory evoked potentials in diagnosis, surgical monitoring and prognosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Chin Med J (Engl) 121:137413782008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Eggspuehler ASutter MAGrob DJeszenszky DPorchet FDvorak J: Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during cervical spine surgical procedures in 246 patients. Eur Spine J 16:Suppl 2S209S2152007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Engler GLSpielholz NJBernhard WNDanziger FMerkin HWolff T: Somatosensory evoked potentials during Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:5285321978

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Fehlings MGHouldon DVajkoczy P: Introduction. Intraoperative neuromonitoring: an essential component of the neurosurgical and spinal armamentarium. Neurosurg Focus 27:4E12009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Ginsburg HHShetter AGRaudzens PA: Postoperative paraplegia with preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Case report. J Neurosurg 63:2963001985

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Gokaslan ZLSamudrala SDeletis VWildrick DMCooper PR: Intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function using motor evoked potentials via transcutaneous epidural electrode during anterior cervical spinal surgery. J Spinal Disord 10:2993031997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Gonzalez AAJeyanandarajan DHansen CZada GHsieh PC: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: a review. Neurosurg Focus 27:4E62009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Herdmann JDeletis VEdmonds HL JrMorota N: Spinal cord and nerve root monitoring in spine surgery and related procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:8798851996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Hilibrand ASSchwartz DMSethuraman VVaccaro ARAlbert TJ: Comparison of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:124812532004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Keith RWStambough JLAwender SH: Somatosensory cortical evoked potentials: a review of 100 cases of intraoperative spinal surgery monitoring. J Spinal Disord 3:2202261990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Kelleher MOTan GSarjeant RFehlings MG: Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg Spine 8:2152212008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Khan MHSmith PNBalzer JRCrammond DWelch WCGerszten P: Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during cervical spine corpectomy surgery: experience with 508 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E105E1132006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Kim DHZaremski JKwon BJenis LWoodard EBode R: Risk factors for false positive transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring alerts during surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:304130462007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Kombos TSuess ODa Silva CCiklatekerlio ONobis VBrock M: Impact of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring on cervical surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol 20:1221282003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Lee JYHilibrand ASLim MRZavatsky JZeiller SSchwartz DM: Characterization of neurophysiologic alerts during anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:191619222006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Lesser RPRaudzens PLüders HNuwer MRGoldie WDMorris HH III: Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol 19:22251986

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Lo YL: How has electrophysiology changed the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy?. Eur J Neurol 15:7817862008

  • 29

    Marshall WHWalsey CNBard P: Observations on cortical somatic sensory mechanisms of cat and monkey. J Neurophysiol 4:1241941

  • 30

    May DMJones SJCrockard HA: Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in cervical surgery: identification of pre- and intraoperative risk factors associated with neurological deterioration. J Neurosurg 85:5665731996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Meyer PR JrCotler HBGireesan GT: Operative neurological complications resulting from thoracic and lumbar spine internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2371251311988

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Nurick S: The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95:871001972

  • 33

    Pechstein UCedzich CNadstawek JSchramm J: Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery 39:3353441996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Resnick DKAnderson PAKaiser MGGroff MWHeary RFHolly LT: Electrophysiological monitoring during surgery for cervical degenerative myelopathy and radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 11:2452522009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Seyal MMull B: Mechanisms of signal change during intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the spinal cord. J Clin Neurophysiol 19:4094152002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Smith PNBalzer JRKhan MHDavis RACrammond DWelch WC: Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in nonmyelopathic patients—a review of 1,039 cases. Spine J 7:83872007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Stechison MTPanagis SGReinhart SS: Somatosensory evoked potential. Monitoring during spinal surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 135:56611995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Sutter MDeletis VDvorak JEggspuehler AGrob DMacdonald D: Current opinions and recommendations on multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeries. Eur Spine J 16:Suppl 2S232S2372007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Sutter MEggspuehler AGrob DJeszenszky DBenini APorchet F: The diagnostic value of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during spine surgery: a prospective study of 1,017 patients. Eur Spine J 16:Suppl 2S162S1702007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Wang ACThan KDEtame ABLa Marca FPark P: Impact of anesthesia on transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring during spine surgery: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 27:4E72009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Whittle IRJohnston IHBesser M: Recording of spinal somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring. J Neurosurg 64:6016121986

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Wiedemayer HSandalcioglu IEArmbruster WRegel JSchaefer HStolke D: False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:2802862004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 225 225 10
Full Text Views 128 128 1
PDF Downloads 178 178 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar