Congenital atlantoaxial dislocation: a dynamic process and role of facets in irreducibility

Clinical article

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurosurgery and
  • 2 Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

Patient age at presentation with congenital atlantoaxial dislocation (CAAD) is variable. In addition, the factors determining irreducibility or reducibility in these patients remain unclear. The facets appear to contribute to the stability of the joint, albeit to an unknown extent. The objective of this paper was to study the characteristics of C1–2 facets in these patients and their bearing on the clinicoradiological presentation and management.

Methods

Twenty-four patients with CAAD were studied. Fifteen patients had irreducible CAAD (IrAAD); 3 of these patients experienced incomplete reduction after traction, and 9 had reducible CAAD (RAAD). The images (CT scans of the craniovertebral junction in a neutral position) obtained in the parasagittal, axial, and coronal planes were studied with respect to the C1–2 facets and were compared with 32 control scans. The inferior sagittal and coronal C-1 facet angles were measured. The lordosis of the cervical spine (cervical spine angle calculated on radiographs of the cervical spine, neutral view) in these patients was compared with normal. The management of these patients is described.

Results

The inferior sagittal C-1 facet angle and at least one coronal angle in patients with IrAAD were significantly acute compared with those in patients with RAAD and the control population. A significant correlation was found between age and the acuteness of the inferior sagittal C-1 facet angle (that is, the more acute the angle, the earlier the presentation). The lordosis of the cervical spine was exaggerated in patients with IrAAD. Three patients with IrAAD who had smaller acute angles experienced a partial reduction after traction and a complete reduction after intraoperative distraction of the facets, thereby avoiding a transoral procedure. An inferior sagittal C-1 facet angle of more than 150° in the sagittal plane predicted reducibility. Drilling a wedge off the facet in the sagittal plane to make the inferior sagittal C-1 facet angle 150° can reduce the C1–2 joint intraoperatively by posterior approach alone.

Conclusions

The acuteness of the inferior C-1 sagittal facet angles possibly determines the age at presentation and reducibility. The coronal angles determine the telescoping of C-2 within C-1. Patients with IrAAD can be treated using a posterior approach alone with the exception of those with extremely acute angles or a retroflexed dens. The exaggerated lordosis of the cervical spine in these patients is a compensatory phenomenon.

Abbreviations used in this paper: AAD = atlantoaxial dislocation; CAAD = congenital AAD; CVJ = craniovertebral junction; IrAAD = irreducible CAAD; Oc = occiput; RAAD = reducible CAAD.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Kanchan K. Mukherjee, M.Ch., Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh 160 012, India. email: kkmneuro@yahoo.in.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online August 19, 2011; DOI: 10.3171/2011.7.SPINE1152.

  • 1

    Bedi A, & Hensinger RN, Congenital anomalies of the cervical spine. Herkowitz HN, , Garfin SR, & Eismont FJ, : Rothman-Simeone: The Spine ed 5 Philadelphia, Saunders Elsevier, 2006. I:630674

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Behari S, , Bhargava V, , Nayak S, , Kiran Kumar MV, , Banerji D, & Chhabra DK, : Congenital reducible atlantoaxial dislocation: classification and surgical considerations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:11651177, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Goel A: Treatment of basilar invagination by atlantoaxial joint distraction and direct lateral mass fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 1:281286, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Goel A, & Shah A: Atlantoaxial joint distraction as a treatment for basilar invagination: a report of an experience with 11 cases. Neurol India 56:144150, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Goel A, , Shah A, & Rajan S: Vertical mobile and reducible atlantoaxial dislocation. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 11:914, 2009

  • 6

    Jain VK, & Behari S: Management of congenital atlanto-axial dislocation: some lessons learnt. Neurol India 50:386397, 2002

  • 7

    Jain VK, , Mittal P, , Banerji D, , Behari S, , Acharya R, & Chhabra DK: Posterior occipitoaxial fusion for atlantoaxial dislocation associated with occipitalized atlas. J Neurosurg 84:559564, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Kothari M, & Goel A: Transatlantic odonto-occipital listhesis: the so-called basilar invagination. Neurol India 55:67, 2007

  • 9

    Kulkarni AG, & Goel AH: Vertical atlantoaxial index: a new craniovertebral radiographic index. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:410, 2008

  • 10

    Menezes AH: Craniocervical developmental anatomy and its implications. Childs Nerv Syst 24:11091122, 2008

  • 11

    Menezes AH: Decision making. Childs Nerv Syst 24:11471153, 2008

  • 12

    Menezes AH: Surgical approaches: postoperative care and complications “transoral-transpalatopharyngeal approach to the craniocervical junction.”. Childs Nerv Syst 24:11871193, 2008. Review

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Newell RLM, The back. Standring S: Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice ed 39 Edinburgh, Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2005. 733774

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Salunke P, , Behari S, , Kirankumar MV, , Sharma MS, , Jaiswal AK, & Jain VK: Pediatric congenital atlantoaxial dislocation: differences between the irreducible and reducible varieties. J Neurosurg 104:2 Suppl 115122, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Takeshita K, , Murakami M, , Kobayashi A, & Nakamura C: Relationship between cervical curvature index (Ishihara) and cervical spine angle (C2–7). J Orthop Sci 6:223226, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 459 110 9
Full Text Views 101 11 0
PDF Downloads 122 8 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0