Editorial: The real value of cervical arthroplasty?

Restricted access

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Article Information

Contributor Notes

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online June 24, 2011; DOI: 10.3171/2011.3.SPINE11130.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
References
  • 1

    Bartels RHDonk RVerbeek AL: No justification for cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurosurgery 66:115311602010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Burkus JKHaid RWTraynelis VCMummaneni PV: Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 13:3083182010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Coric DCassis JCarew JDBoltes MO: Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 13:7157212010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Coric DNunley PDGuyer RDMusante DCarmody CNGordon CR: Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine [epub ahead of print June 24 2011: DOI: 10.3171/2011.5.SPINE10769]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Garrido BJTaha TASasso RC: Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. J Spinal Disorders Tech 23:152009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Heller JGSasso RCPapadopoulos SMAnderson PAFessler RGHacker RJ: Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1011072009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Jawahar ACavanaugh DAKerr EJ IIIBirdsong EMNunley PD: Total disc arthroplasty does not affect the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical spine: results of 93 patients in three prospective randomized clinical trials. Spine J 10:104310482010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Lee JHJung TGKim HSJang JSLee SH: Analysis of the incidence and clinical effect of the heterotopic ossification in a single-level cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine J 10:6766822010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Mummaneni PVBurkus JKHaid RWTraynelis VCZdeblick TA: Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:1982092007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Murrey DJanssen MDelamarter RGoldstein JZigler JTay B: Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J 9:2752862009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Pickett GESekhon LHSears WRDuggal N: Complications with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 4:981052006

  • 12

    Seo MChoi D: Adjacent segment disease after fusion for cervical spondylosis; myth or reality?. Br J Neurosurg 2:1951992008

  • 1

    Berry MRPeterson BGAlander DH: A granulomatous mass surrounding a Maverick total disc replacement causing iliac vein occlusion and spinal stenosis: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:124212452010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Cavanaugh DANunley PDKerr EJ IIIWerner DJJawahar A: Delayed hyper-reactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E262E2652009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Pandit HGlyn-Jones SMcLardy-Smith PGundle RWhitwell DGibbons CL: Pseudotumors associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:8478512008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Park YSMoon YWLim SJYang JMAhn GChoi YL: Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:151515212005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 183 183 53
Full Text Views 25 20 0
PDF Downloads 135 78 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar