An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion

Clinical article

Matthew D. Cummock Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Matthew D. Cummock in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 B.A.
,
Steven Vanni Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Steven Vanni in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 D.O.
,
Allan D. Levi Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Allan D. Levi in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D., Ph.D.
,
Yong Yu Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Yong Yu in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
, and
Michael Y. Wang Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Michael Y. Wang in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $384.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $624.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $384.00
USD  $624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

Object

The minimally invasive transpsoas interbody fusion technique requires dissection through the psoas muscle, which contains the nerves of the lumbosacral plexus posteriorly and genitofemoral nerve anteriorly. Retraction of the psoas is becoming recognized as a cause of transient postoperative thigh pain, numbness, paresthesias, and weakness. However, few reports have described the nature of thigh symptoms after this procedure.

Methods

The authors performed a review of patients who underwent the transpsoas technique for lumbar spondylotic disease, disc degeneration, and spondylolisthesis treated at a single academic medical center. A review of patient charts, including the use of detailed patient-driven pain diagrams performed at equal preoperative and follow-up intervals, investigated the survival of postoperative thigh pain, numbness, paresthesias, and weakness of the iliopsoas and quadriceps muscles in the follow-up period on the ipsilateral side of the surgical approach.

Results

Over a 3.2-year period, 59 patients underwent transpsoas interbody fusion surgery. Of these, 62.7% had thigh symptoms postoperatively. New thigh symptoms at first follow-up visit included the following: burning, aching, stabbing, or other pain (39.0%); numbness (42.4%); paresthesias (11.9%); and weakness (23.7%). At 3 months postoperatively, these percentages decreased to 15.5%, 24.1%, 5.6%, and 11.3%, respectively. Within the patient sample, 44% underwent a 1-level, 41% a 2-level, and 15% a 3-level transpsoas operation. While not statistically significant, thigh pain, numbness, and weakness were most prevalent after L4–5 transpsoas interbody fusion at the first postoperative follow-up. The number of lumbar levels that were surgically treated had no clear association with thigh symptoms but did correlate directly with surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay.

Conclusions

Transpsoas interbody fusion is associated with high rates of immediate postoperative thigh symptoms. While larger, prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings, the authors found that half of the patients had symptom resolution at approximately 3 months postoperatively and more than 90% by 1 year.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

BMP = bone morphogenetic protein; DLIF = direct lateral interbody fusion; EMG = electromyography; LFCN = lateral femoral cutaneous nerve; PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion; XLIF = extreme lateral interbody fusion.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Benglis DM, , Elhammady MS, , Levi AD, & Vanni S: Minimally invasive anterolateral approaches for the treatment of back pain and adult degenerative deformity. Neurosurgery 63:3 Suppl A191A196, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Benglis DM, , Vanni S, & Levi AD: An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 10:139144, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Bergey DL, , Villavicencio AT, , Goldstein T, & Regan JJ: Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:16811688, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Brau SA, , Spoonamore MJ, , Snyder L, , Gilbert C, , Rhonda G, & Williams LA, et al.: Nerve monitoring changes related to iliac artery compression during anterior lumbar spine surgery. Spine J 3:351355, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Datta G, , Gnanalingham KK, , Peterson D, , Mendoza N, , O'Neill K, & Van Dellen J, et al.: Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction?. Neurosurgery 54:14131420, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    de Ridder VA, , de Lange S, & Popta JV: Anatomical variations of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and the consequences for surgery. J Orthop Trauma 13:207211, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Eck JC, , Hodges S, & Humphreys SC: Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:321329, 2007

  • 8

    German JW, & Foley KT: Minimal access surgical techniques in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:16 Suppl S52S59, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kawaguchi Y, , Matsui H, , Gejo R, & Tsuji H: Preventive measures of back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery in rats. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:22822288, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kawaguchi Y, , Matsui H, & Tsuji H: Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2: Histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:25982602, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Kirchmair L, , Lirk P, , Colvin J, , Mitterschiffthaler G, & Moriggl B: Lumbar plexus and psoas major muscle: not always as expected. Reg Anesth Pain Med 33:109114, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Knight RQ, , Schwaegler P, , Hanscom D, & Roh J: Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:3437, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    McAfee PC, , Regan JJ, , Geis WP, & Fedder IL: Minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Emphasis on the lateral BAK. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:14761484, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Moro T, , Kikuchi S, , Konno S, & Yaginuma H: An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:423428, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Murata Y, , Takahashi K, , Yamagata M, , Shimada Y, & Moriya H: The anatomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, with special reference to the harvesting of iliac bone graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:746747, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Nakamura H, , Ishikawa T, , Konishi S, , Seki M, & Yamano Y: Psoas strapping technique: a new technique for laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Am Coll Surg 191:686688, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Nobel W, , Marks SC Jr, & Kubik S: The anatomical basis for femoral nerve palsy following iliacus hematoma. J Neurosurg 52:533540, 1980

  • 18

    Ozgur BM, , Aryan HE, , Pimenta L, & Taylor WR: Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435443, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Papastefanou SL, , Stevens K, & Mulholland RC: Femoral nerve palsy. An unusual complication of anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:28422844, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Pimenta L, , Lhamby J, , Gharzedine I, & Coutinho E: XLIF approach for the treatment of adult scoliosis: 2-year follow-up. Spine J 7:Suppl 52S53S, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Regev GJ, , Chen L, , Dhawan M, , Lee YP, , Garfin SR, & Kim CW: Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:13301335, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Saraph V, , Lerch C, , Walochnik N, , Bach CM, , Krismer M, & Wimmer C: Comparison of conventional versus minimally invasive extraperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 13:425431, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Shen FH, , Samartzis D, , Khanna AJ, & Anderson DG: Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusions. Orthop Clin North Am 38:373386, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Taylor H, , McGregor AH, , Medhi-Zadeh S, , Richards S, , Kahn N, & Zadeh JA, et al.: The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:27582762, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Tonetti J, , Vouaillat H, , Kwon BK, , Selek L, , Guigard S, & Merloz P, et al.: Femoral nerve palsy following mini-open extraperitoneal lumbar approach: report of three cases and cadaveric mechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:135141, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Wang MY, , Anderson DG, , Poelstra KA, & Ludwig SC: Minimally invasive posterior fixation. Neurosurgery 63:3 Suppl A197A203, 2008

  • 27

    Wang MY, & Mummaneni PV: Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 28:3 E9, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 5119 1426 101
Full Text Views 402 41 2
PDF Downloads 524 42 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0