Clinical and methodological precision of spinal navigation assisted by 3D intraoperative O-arm radiographic imaging

Technical note

Restricted access

Object

In recent years, the importance of intraoperative navigation in neurosurgery has been increasing. Multiple studies have proven the advantages and safety of computer-assisted spinal neurosurgery. The use of intraoperative 3D radiographic imaging to acquire image information for navigational purposes has several advantages and should increase the accuracy and safety of screw guidance with navigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and methodological precision of navigated spine surgery in combination with the O-arm multidimensional imaging system.

Methods

Thoracic, lumbar, and sacral pedicle screws that were placed with the help of the combination of the O-arm and StealthStation TREON plus navigation systems were analyzed. To evaluate clinical precision, 278 polyaxial pedicle screws in 139 vertebrae were reviewed for medial or caudal perforations on coronal projection. For the evaluation of the methodological accuracy, virtual and intraoperative images were compared, and the angulation of the pedicle screw to the midsagittal line was measured.

Results

Pedicle perforations were recorded in 3.2% of pedicle screws. None of the perforated pedicle screws damaged a nerve root. The difference in angulation between the actual and virtual pedicle screws was 2.8° ± 1.9°.

Conclusions

The use of the StealthStation TREON plus navigation system in combination with the O-arm system showed the highest accuracy for spinal navigation compared with other studies that used traditional image acquisition and registration for navigation.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Matthias F. Oertel, M.D., Associate Professor of Neurosurgery, Klinikstrasse 29, Giessen 35385, Germany. email: matthias.oertel@neuro.med.uni-giessen.de.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online January 28, 2011; DOI: 10.3171/2010.10.SPINE091032.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    The setup for O-arm–assisted navigated spinal surgery is shown. The patient is positioned prone on a carbon operating table. The reference frame is attached to one of the spinous processes. The O-arm is in the parked position. The operating surgeon is watching the StealthStation's monitor while inserting a polyaxial pedicle screw with a navigable screwdriver.

  • View in gallery

    This coronal image from a 3D data set, acquired using the O-arm after insertion of 4 pedicle screws, shows 3 pedicle screws within the pedicle. The screw at the lower left (arrows) shows a breach of the medial edge of the pedicle.

  • View in gallery

    These images show the angulations of the pedicle screws relative to the midsagittal line. A total of 94 pedicle screws were analyzed. On average, the difference between the actual (left) and virtual (right) angle was 2.8° ± 1.9°.

  • View in gallery

    The distribution of pedicle screws across the spine is shown. Most screws were inserted at the lower lumbar spine for degenerative spondylolisthesis. The screws that were analyzed for methodological precision were randomly photographed by one of the authors (J.H.) who had no knowledge of the ideal screw position.

References

1

Amiot LPLabelle HDeGuise JASati MBrodeur PRivard CH: Computer-assisted pedicle screw fixation. A feasibility study. Spine 20:120812121995

2

Amiot LPLang KPutzier MZippel HLabelle H: Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine 25:6066142000

3

Antekeier SBAntekeier DPCrawford CHMalkani AL: Accuracy of computer assisted percutaneous placement of iliosacral screws: a cadaveric study. Comput Aided Surg 8:1982032003

4

Choi WWGreen BALevi AD: Computer-assisted fluoroscopic targeting system for pedicle screw insertion. Neurosurgery 47:8728782000

5

Ebmeier KGiest KKalff R: Intraoperative computerized tomography for improved accuracy of spinal navigation in pedicle screw placement of the thoracic spine. Acta Neurochir Suppl 85:1051132003

6

Gebhard FWeidner ALiener UCStöckle UArand M: Navigation at the spine. Injury 35:Suppl 1S-A35S-A452004

7

Holly LTFoley KT: Intraoperative spinal navigation. Spine 28:15 SupplS54S612003

8

Kalfas IHKormos DWMurphy MAMcKenzie RLBarnett GHBell GR: Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. J Neurosurg 83:6416471995

9

Kamimura MEbara SItoh HTateiwa YKinoshita TTakaoka K: Accurate pedicle screw insertion under the control of a computer-assisted image guiding system: laboratory test and clinical study. J Orthop Sci 4:1972061999

10

Laine TLund TYlikowski MSchlenzka DLohikoski J: Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial of 46 consecutive patients. International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, 26th MeetingKona, HawaiiJune 21–June 25, 1999(unpublished abstract)

11

Laine TMäkitalo KSchlenzka DTallroth KPoussa MAlho A: Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: a prospective CT study in 30 low back patients. Eur Spine J 6:4024051997

12

Lekovic GPPotts EAKarahalios DGHall G: A comparison of two techniques in image-guided thoracic pedicle screw placement: a retrospective study of 37 patients and 277 pedicle screws. J Neurosurg Spine 7:3933982007

13

Merloz PTonetti JEid AFontanel FLavallee STroccaz J: Pedicle screw placement using computer assisted technique. Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery, Fourth International SymposiumDavosMarch 17–19, 199938(Poster) (http://www.caos-international.org/1999/caos99_final.html) [Accessed November 5 2010]

14

Merloz PTonetti JPittet LCoulomb MLavalleé SSautot P: Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:39481998

15

Ohnsorge JASiebert CHSchkommodau EMahnken AHPrescher AWeisskopf M: [Minimally-invasive computerassisted fluoroscopic navigation for kyphoplasty.]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143:1952032005. (Ger)

16

Rajasekaran SVidyadhara SRamesh PShetty AP: Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine 32:E56E642007

17

Sasso RCGarrido BJ: Computer-assisted spinal navigation versus serial radiography and operative time for posterior spinal fusion at L5-S1. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:1181222007

18

Schlenzka DLaine TLund T: Computer-assisted spine surgery. Eur Spine J 9:Suppl 1S57S642000

19

Schwarzenbach OBerlemann UJost BVisarius HArm ELanglotz F: Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement. An in vivo computed tomography analysis. Spine 22:4524581997

20

Tannoury TCrowl ACBattaglia TCChan DPAnderson DG: An anatomical study comparing standard fluoroscopy and virtual fluoroscopy for the placement of C1-2 transarticular screws. J Neurosurg Spine 2:5845882005

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 161 161 63
Full Text Views 97 97 12
PDF Downloads 129 129 10
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar