Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

The authors performed a retrospective clinical study to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation (3D FN).

Methods

The study involved 62 consecutive patients undergoing posterior stabilization of the cervical spine between 2003 and 2008. Thirty patients (126 screws) were treated using conventional techniques (CVTs) with a lateral fluoroscopic view, whereas 32 patients (150 screws) were treated using 3D FN. Screw positions were classified into 4 grades based on the pedicle wall perforations observed on postoperative CT.

Results

The prevalence of perforations in the CVT group was 27% (34 screws): 92 (73.0%), 12 (9.5%), 6 (4.8%), and 16 (12.7%) for Grade 0 (no perforation), Grade 1 (perforation < 1 mm), Grade 2 (perforation ≥ 1 and < 2 mm), and Grade 3 (perforation ≥ 2 mm), respectively. In the 3D FN group, the prevalence of perforations was 18.7% (28 screws): 122 (81.3%), 17 (11.3%), 6 (4%), and 5 (3.3%) for Grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in the prevalence of Grade 1 or higher perforations between the CVT and 3D FN groups. A higher prevalence of malpositioned CPSs was seen in Grade 2 or higher (17.5% vs 7.3%, p < 0.05) in the 3D FN group and Grade 3 (12.7% vs 7.3%, p < 0.05) perforations in the CVT group. The ORs for CPS malpositioning in the CVT group were 2.72 (95% CI 1.16–6.39) in Grade 2 or higher perforations and 3.89 (95% CI 1.26–12.02) in Grade 3 perforations.

Conclusions

Three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation can improve the accuracy of CPS insertion; however, severe CPS malpositioning that causes injury to the vertebral artery or neurological complications can occur even with 3D FN. Advanced techniques for the insertion of CPSs and the use of modified insertion devices can reduce the risk of a malpositioned CPS and provide increased safety.

Abbreviations used in this paper: CPS = cervical pedicle screw; CVT = conventional technique; VA = vertebral artery; 3D FN = 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Yoshimoto Ishikawa, M.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Center, Konan Kosei Hospital, 137 Omatsubara, Takaya-chou, Konan City, 483-8704 Japan. email: chita.peninsula@gmail.com.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
References
  • 1

    Abumi KItoh HTaneichi HKaneda K: Transpedicular screw fixation for traumatic lesions of the middle and lower cervical spine: description of the techniques and preliminary report. J Spinal Disord 7:19281994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Abumi KKaneda K: Pedicle screw fixation for nontraumatic lesions of the cervical spine. Spine 22:185318631997

  • 3

    Abumi KShono YIto MTaneichi HKotani YKaneda K: Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine 25:9629692000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Hasegawa KHirano TShimoda HHomma TMorita O: Indications for cervical pedicle screw instrumentation in nontraumatic lesions. Spine 33:228422892008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Holly LTFoley KT: Intraoperative spinal navigation. Spine 28:15 SupplS54S612003

  • 6

    Hott JSDeshmukh VRKlopfenstein JDSonntag VKDickman CASpetzler RF: Intraoperative Iso-C C-arm navigation in craniospinal surgery: the first 60 cases. Neurosurgery 54:113111372004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Ito HNeo MYoshida MFujibayashi SYoshitomi HNakamura T: Efficacy of computer-assisted pedicle screw insertion for cervical instability in RA patients. Rheumatol Int 27:5675742007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Ito YSugimoto YTomioka MHasegawa YNakago KYagata Y: Clinical accuracy of 3D fluoroscopy–assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 9:4504532008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Jones ELHeller JGSilcox DHHutton WC: Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine 22:9779821997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kamimura MEbara SItoh HTateiwa YKinoshita TTakaoka K: Cervical pedicle screw insertion: assessment of safety and accuracy with computer-assisted image guidance. J Spinal Disord 13:2182242000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Karaikovic EEDaubs MDMadsen RWGaines RW Jr: Morphologic characteristics of human cervical pedicles. Spine 22:4935001997

  • 12

    Karaikovic EEYingsakmongkol WGaines RW Jr: Accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement using the funnel technique. Spine 26:245624622001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Kotani YAbumi KIto MMinami A: Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg 99:3 Suppl2572632003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kothe RRüther WSchneider ELinke B: Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. Spine 29:186918752004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Laine TSchlenzka DMäkitalo KTallroth KNolte LPVisarius H: Improved accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with computer-assisted surgery. A prospective clinical trial of 30 patients. Spine 22:125412581997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Lekovic GPPotts EAKarahalios DGHall G: A comparison of two techniques in image-guided thoracic pedicle screw placement: a retrospective study of 37 patients and 277 pedicle screws. J Neurosurg Spine 7:3933982007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Ludwig SCKramer DLBalderston RAVaccaro ARFoley KFAlbert TJ: Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. Spine 25:165516672000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Neo MSakamoto TFujibayashi SNakamura T: The clinical risk of vertebral artery injury from cervical pedicle screws inserted in degenerative vertebrae. Spine 30:280028052005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Nottmeier EWSeemer WYoung PM: Placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws using three-dimensional image guidance: experience in a large patient cohort. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 10:33392009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Panjabi MMShin EKChen NCWang JL: Internal morphology of human cervical pedicles. Spine 25:119712052000

  • 21

    Rajasekaran SVidyadhara SRamesh PShetty AP: Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine 32:E56E642007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Rajasekaran SVidyadhara SShetty AP: Iso-C3D fluoroscopy-based navigation in direct pedicle screw fixation of Hangman fracture: a case report. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:6166192007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Rampersaud YRPik JHSalonen DFarooq S: Clinical accuracy of fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw fixation: a CT analysis. Spine 30:E183E1902005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Richter MCakir BSchmidt R: Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine 30:228022872005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Richter MMattes TCakir B: Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine. Eur Spine J 13:50592004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Sakamoto TNeo MNakamura T: Transpedicular screw placement evaluated by axial computed tomography of the cervical pedicle. Spine 29:251025152004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Schmidt RWilke HJClaes LPuhl WRichter M: Pedicle screws enhance primary stability in multilevel cervical corpectomies: biomechanical in vitro comparison of different implants including constrained and nonconstrained posterior instrumentations. Spine 28:182118282003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Takahashi JShono YNakamura IHirabayashi HKamimura MEbara S: Computer-assisted screw insertion for cervical disorders in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur Spine J 16:4854942007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Cited By
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 235 233 74
Full Text Views 95 82 1
PDF Downloads 105 57 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar