Examining risk factors for posterior migration of fusion cages following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a possible limitation of unilateral pedicle screw fixation

Clinical article

Yasuchika AokiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Rosai Hospital;

Search for other papers by Yasuchika Aoki in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Masatsune YamagataDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Rosai Hospital;

Search for other papers by Masatsune Yamagata in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Fumitake NakajimaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Rosai Hospital;

Search for other papers by Fumitake Nakajima in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Yoshikazu IkedaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Rosai Hospital;

Search for other papers by Yoshikazu Ikeda in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Koh ShimizuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Rosai Hospital;

Search for other papers by Koh Shimizu in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Masakazu YoshiharaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Rosai Hospital;

Search for other papers by Masakazu Yoshihara in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Junichi IwasakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Rosai Hospital;

Search for other papers by Junichi Iwasaki in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Tomoaki ToyoneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center; and

Search for other papers by Tomoaki Toyone in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Koichi NakagawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University;

Search for other papers by Koichi Nakagawa in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Arata NakajimaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Aoba Municipal Hospital, Chiba, Japan

Search for other papers by Arata Nakajima in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Kazuhisa TakahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University;

Search for other papers by Kazuhisa Takahashi in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
, and
Seiji OhtoriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University;

Search for other papers by Seiji Ohtori in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
View More View Less
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $384.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $624.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $384.00
USD  $624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

Object

Because the authors encountered 4 cases of hardware migration following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, a retrospective study was conducted to identify factors influencing the posterior migration of fusion cages.

Methods

Patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (125 individuals; 144 disc levels) were treated using transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and followed for 12–33 months. Medical records and pre- and postoperative radiographs were reviewed, and factors influencing the incidence of cage migration were analyzed.

Results

Postoperative cage migration was found in 4 patients at or before 3 months. Because all the cages that migrated postoperatively were bullet-shaped (Capstone), only these cages were analyzed. The analysis of preoperative radiographs revealed that higher posterior disc height ([PDH] ≥ 6 mm) significantly increased the incidence of postoperative cage migration, but percent slippage, translation, range of motion, and Cobb angle did not. The incidence of cage migration in patients with unilateral fixation (3 [8.3%] of 36) was not significantly different from that in patients with bilateral fixation (1 [2.1%] of 48). Patients who had scoliotic curvature with a Cobb angle > 10° when treated with unilateral fixation demonstrated a tendency to have more frequent postoperative cage migration than patients treated with bilateral fixation.

To examine the influence of the height of fusion cages, a value obtained by subtracting preoperative anterior disc height (ADH) or PDH from cage height was defined as “Cage height – ADH” (or “Cage height –PDH”). The analysis revealed that the value for “Cage height –ADH” as well as “Cage height –PDH” was significantly lower in migrated levels than in nonmigrated levels, suggesting that the choice of undersized cages may increase the incidence of cage migration.

Conclusions

The results suggest that the use of a bullet-shaped cage, higher PDH, the presence of scoliotic curvature, and undersized fusion cages are possible risk factors for cage migration. One patient with postoperative cage migration following bilateral screw fixation underwent revision surgery, and the pedicle screw fixation was found to be disrupted. Other than in this patient, cage migration occurred only in those treated by unilateral fixation. The potential for postoperative cage migration and limitations of unilateral fixation should be considered by spine surgeons.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

ADH = anterior disc height; PDH = posterior disc height; PLIF = posterior lumbar interbody fusion; ROM = range of motion; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Aoki Y, , Yamagata M, , Nakajima F, , Ikeda Y, & Takahashi K: Posterior migration of fusion cages in degenerative lumbar disease treated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of three patients. Spine 34:E54E58, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Beringer WF, & Mobasser JP: Unilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 20:3 E4, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Boos N, , Marchesi D, , Zuber K, & Aebi M: Treatment of severe spondylolisthesis by reduction and pedicular fixation. A 4–6-year follow-up study. Spine 18:16551661, 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Brantigan JW, & Neidre A: Achievement of normal sagittal plane alignment using a wedged carbon fiber reinforced polymer fusion cage in treatment of spondylolisthesis. Spine J 3:186196, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Chen L, , Yang H, & Tang T: Cage migration in spondylolisthesis treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using BAK cages. Spine 30:21712175, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    de Loubresse CG, , Bon T, , Deburge A, , Lassale B, & Benoit M: Posterolateral fusion for radicular pain in isthmic spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 323:194201, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Humphreys SC, , Hodges SD, , Patwardhan AG, , Eck JC, , Murphy RB, & Covington LA: Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 26:567571, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Iguchi T, , Kanemura A, , Kasahara K, , Sato K, , Kurihara A, & Yoshiya S, et al.: Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms: which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation?. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:284290, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kanayama M, , Hashimoto T, , Shigenobu K, , Oha F, , Ishida T, & Yamane S: Intraoperative biomechanical assessment of lumbar spinal instability: validation of radiographic parameters indicating anterior column support in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 28:23682372, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kettler A, , Schmoelz W, , Kast E, , Gottwald M, , Claes L, & Wilke HJ: In vitro stabilizing effect of a transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages. Spine 30:E665E670, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Lauber S, , Schulte TL, , Liljenqvist U, , Halm H, & Hackenberg L: Clinical and radiologic 2–4-year results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Spine 31:16931698, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Nguyen HV, , Akbarnia BA, , van Dam BE, , Raiszadeh K, , Bagheri R, & Canale S, et al.: Anterior exposure of the spine for removal of lumbar interbody devices and implants. Spine 31:24492453, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Schleicher P, , Beth P, , Ottenbacher A, , Pflugmacher R, , Scholz M, & Schnake KJ, et al.: Biomechanical evaluation of different asymmetrical posterior stabilization methods for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 9:363371, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Takayanagi K, , Takahashi K, , Yamagata M, , Moriya H, , Kitahara H, & Tamaki T: Using cineradiography for continuous dynamic-motion analysis of the lumbar spine. Spine 26:18581865, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Taneichi H, , Suda K, , Kajino T, , Matsumura A, , Moridaira H, & Kaneda K: Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and bilateral anterior-column fixation with two Brantigan I/F cages per level: clinical outcomes during a minimum 2-year follow-up period. J Neurosurg Spine 4:198205, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Toyone T, , Tanaka T, , Kato D, , Kaneyama R, , Watanabe E, & Otsuka M, et al.: Unilateral concave-sided PLIF for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a prospective study of less invasive surgery, Presented at Spine Week 2004. Spine J Meeting Abstract 79, 2004 (http://journals.lww.com/spinejournalabstracts/toc/2004/00030) [Accessed June 8, 2010]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Tuttle J, , Shakir A, & Choudhri HF: Paramedian approach for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation. Technical note and preliminary report on 47 cases. Neurosurg Focus 20:3 E5, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Uzi EA, , Dabby D, , Tolessa E, & Finkelstein JA: Early retropulsion of titanium-threaded cages after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a report of two cases. Spine 26:10731075, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1976 433 17
Full Text Views 289 56 9
PDF Downloads 389 80 10
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0