A computed tomography–based feasibility study of translaminar screw fixation in the upper thoracic spine

Laboratory investigation

Restricted access

Object

Translaminar screws (TLSs) offer an alternative to pedicle screw (PS) fixation in the upper thoracic spine. Although cadaveric studies have described the anatomy of the laminae and pedicles at T1–2, CT imaging is the modality of choice for presurgical planning. In this study, the goal was to determine the diameter, maximal screw length, and optimal screw trajectory for TLS placement at T1–2, and to compare this information to PS placement in the upper thoracic spine as determined by CT evaluation.

Methods

One hundred patients (50 men and 50 women), whose average age was 41.7 ± 19.6 years, were selected by retrospective review of a trauma registry database over a 6-month period. Patients were included in the study if they were over the age of 18, had standardized axial bone-window CT imaging at T1–2, and had no evidence of spinal trauma. For each lamina and pedicle, width (outer cortical and cancellous), maximal screw length, and optimal screw trajectory were measured using eFilm Lite software. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t-test.

Results

The T-1 lamina was estimated to accommodate, on average, a 5.8-mm longer screw than the T-2 lamina (p < 0.001). At T-1, the maximal TLS length was similar to PS length (TLS: 33.4 ± 3.6 mm, PS: 33.9 ± 3.3 mm [p = 0.148]), whereas at T-2, the maximal PS length was significantly greater than the TLS length (TLS: 27.6 ± 3.1 mm, PS: 35.3 ± 3.5 mm [p < 0.001]). When the lamina outer cortical and cancellous width was compared between T-1 and T-2, the lamina at T-2 was, on average, 0.3 mm wider than at T-1 (p = 0.007 and p = 0.003, respectively). In comparison with the corresponding pedicle, the mean outer cortical pedicle width at T-1 was wider than the lamina by an average of 1.0 mm (lamina: 6.6 ± 1.1 mm, pedicle: 7.6 ± 1.3 mm [p < 0.001]). At T-2, however, outer cortical lamina width was wider than the corresponding pedicle by an average of 0.6 mm (lamina: 6.9 ± 1.1 mm, pedicle: 6.3 ± 1.2 mm [p < 0.001]). At T-1, 97.5% of laminae measured could accept a 4.0-mm screw with 1.0 mm of clearance, compared with 99.5% of T-1 pedicles; whereas at T-2, 99% of laminae met this requirement, compared with 94.5% of pedicles. The ideal screw trajectory was also measured (T-1: 49.2 ± 3.7° for TLS and 32.8 ± 3.8° for PS; T-2: 51.1 ± 3.5° for TLS and 20.5 ± 4.4° for PS).

Conclusions

Based on CT evaluation, there are no anatomical limitations to the placement of TLSs compared with PSs at T1–2. Differences were noted, however, in lamina length and width between T-1 and T-2 that must be considered when placing TLS at these levels.

Abbreviations used in this paper: PS = pedicle screw; TLS = translaminar screw.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Ryan M. Kretzer, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Meyer 8-161, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21287. email: rkretzer@jhmi.edu.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Axial CT scan at T-1 showing (upper) optimal TLS length and trajectory and (lower) determination of medialization angle in relation to midline.

  • View in gallery

    Axial CT scan at T-1 showing (upper) optimal PS length and trajectory and (lower) determination of medialization angle in relation to midline.

  • View in gallery

    Axial CT scan at T-1 showing measurement of (upper) outer cortical diameter and (lower) cancellous diameter for each lamina and pedicle.

  • View in gallery

    Bar graph showing average maximum TLS versus PS length at T1–2.

  • View in gallery

    Bar graph showing average outer cortical lamina versus pedicle width at T1–2.

References

  • 1

    An HSGordon RRenner K: Anatomic considerations for plate-screw fixation of the cervical spine. Spine 16:Suppl 10548S551S1991

  • 2

    Cardoso MJDmitriev AELehman RAHelgeson MCooper PRosner MK: Computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation of screw fixation options at the cervicothoracic junction: intralamina versus intrapedicular techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:261226172008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Chamoun RBRelyea KMJohnson KKWhitehead WECurry DJLuerssen TG: Use of axial and subaxial translaminar screw fixation in the management of upper cervical spinal instability in a series of 7 children. Neurosurgery 64:7347392009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Chapman JRAnderson PAPepin CToomey SNewell DWGrady MS: Posterior instrumentation of the unstable cervicothoracic spine. J Neurosurg 84:5525581996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Chern JJChamoun RBWhitehead WECurry DJLuerssen TGJea A: Computed tomography morphometric analysis of axial and subaxial translaminar screw placement in the pediatric cervical spine. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:1211282009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Daffner SDVaccaro AR: Managing disorders of the cervicothoracic junction. Am J Orthop 31:3233272002

  • 7

    Dean CLLee MJRobbin MCassinelli EH: Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement. Spine J 9:2582622009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Ebraheim NAJabaly GXu RYeasting RA: Anatomic relations of the thoracic pedicle to the adjacent neural structures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:155315571997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hartl RTheodore NDickman CASonntag VKH: Technique of thoracic pedicle screw fixation for trauma. Oper Tech Neurosurg 7:22302004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Heller JGShuster JKHutton WC: Pedicle and transverse process screws of the upper thoracic spine. Biomechanical comparison of loads to failure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:6546581999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hong JTSung JHSon BCLee SWPark CK: Significance of laminar screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:173917432008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Jea AJohnson KKWhitehead WELuerssen TG: Translaminar screw fixation in the subaxial pediatric cervical spine: technical note. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:3863902008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Kreshak JLKim DHLindsey DPKam ACPanjabi MMYerby SA: Posterior stabilization at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:276327702002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kretzer RMSciubba DMBagley CAWolinsky JPGokaslan ZLGaronzik IM: Translaminar screw fixation in the upper thoracic spine. J Neurosurg Spine 5:5275332006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Lewis SJCanavese FKeetbaas S: Intralaminar screw insertion of thoracic spine in children with severe spinal deformities: two case reports. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E251E2542009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Mazel CHoffmann EAntonietti PGrunenwald DHenry MWilliams J: Posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation in spine tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:124612532004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Panjabi MMTakata KGoel VFederico DOxland TDuranceau J: Thoracic human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:8889011991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Prybis BGTortolani PJHu NZorn CMMcAfee PCCunningham BW: A comparative biomechanical analysis of spinal instability and instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction: an in vitro human cadaveric model. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:2332382007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Sapkas GPapadakis SKatonis PRoidis NKontakis G: Operative treatment of unstable injuries of the cervicothoracic junction. Eur Spine J 8:2792831999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Sciubba DMNoggle JCVellimana AKConway JEKretzer RMLong DM: Laminar screw fixation of the axis. J Neurosurg Spine 8:3273342008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Stanescu SEbraheim NAYeasting RABailey ASJackson WT: Morphometric evaluation of the cervico-thoracic junction. Practical considerations for posterior fixation of the spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:208220881994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Steinmetz MPMiller JWarbel AKrishnaney AABingaman WBenzel EC: Regional instability following cervicothoracic junction surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 4:2782842006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Ugur HCAttar AUz ATekdemir IEgemen NGenç Y: Thoracic pedicle: surgical anatomic evaluation and relations. J Spinal Disord 14:39452001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Wang MY: C2 crossing laminar screws: cadaveric morphometric analysis. Neurosurgery 1 Suppl59:ONS84ONS882006

  • 25

    Wang MY: Cervical crossing laminar screws: early clinical results and complications. Neurosurgery 61:5 Suppl3113162007

  • 26

    Wright NM: Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws: case series and technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:1581622004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Wright NM: Translaminar rigid screw fixation of the axis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 3:4094142005

  • 28

    Zindrick MRWiltse LLDoornik AWidell EHKnight GWPatwardhan AG: Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12:1601661987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 102 102 11
Full Text Views 113 113 1
PDF Downloads 122 122 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar