Effective lordosis: analysis of sagittal spinal canal alignment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Analysis of cervical sagittal deformity in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) requires a thorough clinical and radiographic evaluation to select the most appropriate surgical approach. Angular radiographic measurements, which are commonly used to define sagittal deformity, may not be the most appropriate to use for surgical planning. The authors present a simple straight-line method to measure effective spinal canal lordosis and analyze its reliability. Furthermore, comparisons of this measurement to traditional angular measurements of sagittal cervical alignment are made in regards to surgical planning in patients with CSM.

Methods

Twenty preoperative lateral cervical digital radiographs of patients with CSM were analyzed by 3 independent observers on 3 separate occasions using a software measurement program. Sagittal measurements included C2–7 angles utilizing the Cobb and posterior tangent methods, as well as a straight-line method to measure effective spinal canal lordosis from the dorsal-caudal aspect of the C2–7 vertebral bodies. Analysis of variance for repeated measures or Cohen 3-way (kappa) correlation coefficient analysis was performed as appropriate to calculate the intra- and interobserver reliability for each parameter. Discrepancies in angular and effective lordosis measurements were analyzed.

Results

Intra- and interobserver reliability was excellent (intraclass coefficient > 0.75, kappa > 0.90) utilizing all 3 techniques. Four discrepancies between angular and effective lordotic measurements occurred in which images with a lordotic angular measurement did not have lordosis within the ventral spinal canal. These discrepancies were caused by either spondylolisthesis or dorsally projecting osteophytes in all cases.

Conclusions

Although they are reliable, traditional methods used to make angular measurements of sagittal cervical spine alignment do not take into account ventral obstructions to the spinal cord. The effective lordosis measurement method provides a simple and reliable means of determining clinically significant lordosis because it accounts for both overall alignment of the cervical spine as well as impinging structures ventral to the spinal cord. This method should be considered for use in the treatment of patients with CSM.

Abbreviations used in this paper: CSM = cervical spondylotic myelopathy; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: David E. Gwinn, M.D., Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave/A41, Cleveland, Ohio 44195. email: gwinny13@yahoo.com.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
References
  • 1

    Cobb JR: Outlines for the Study of Scoliosis. Instructional Course Lectures Vol 5:Ann Arbor, MichiganAmerican Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons1948. 261275

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Dvorak JPanjabi MMGrob DNovotny JEAntinnes JA: Clinical validation of functional flexion/extension radiographs of the cervical spine. Spine 18:1201271993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Farfan HF: Mechanical disorders of the lower back PhiladelphiaLea & Febiger1973

  • 4

    Ferguson RJCaplan LR: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurol Clin 3:3733821985

  • 5

    Fleiss JL: The design and analysis of clinical experiments New YorkWiley1986

  • 6

    Frobin WLeivseth GBiggemann MBrinckmann P: Sagittal plane segmental motion of the cervical spine. A new precision measurement protocol and normal motion data of healthy adults. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 17:21312002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Frobin WLeivseth GBiggemann MBrinckmann P: Vertebral height, disk height, posteroanterior displacement and dens-atlas gap in the cervical spine: precision measurement protocol and normal data. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 17:4234312002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Gore DRSepic SBGardner GM: Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Spine 11:5215241986

  • 9

    Harrison DDCailliet RJanik TJTroyanovich SJHarrison DEHolland B: Elliptical modeling of the sagittal lumbar lordosis and segmental rotation angles as a method to discriminate between normal an low back pain subjects. J Spinal Disord 11:4304391998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Harrison DDJanik TJTroyanovich SJHolland B: Comparisons of lordotic cervical spine curvatures to a theoretical ideal model of the static sagittal cervical spine. Spine 21:6676751996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Harrison DEHarrison DDCailliet RTroyanovich SJJanik TJHolland B: Cobb method of Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine 25:207220782000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Herrmann AMGeisler FH: A new computer-aided technique for analysis of lateral cervical radiographs in postoperative patients with degenerative disease. Spine 29:179518032004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Ishihara A: [Roentgenographic studies on the normal pattern of the cervical curvature.]. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 42:103310441968. Jpn

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Jackson BLHarrison DDRobertson GABarker WF: Chiropractic biophysics lateral cervical film analysis reliability. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 16:3843911993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Jackson R: The cervical syndrome Springfield, IllinoisCharles C. Thomas1956

  • 16

    Kaiser JAHolland B: Imaging of the cervical spine. Spine 23:270127121998

  • 17

    Kaptain GJSimmons NEReplogle REPobereskin L: Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 93:2 Suppl1992042000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Landis JRKoch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:1591741977

  • 19

    Morishita YHida SMiyazaki MHong SWZou JWei F: The effects of the degenerative changes in the functional spinal unit of the kinematics of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E178E1822008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Ohara AMiyamoto KNaganawa TMatsumoto KShimizu K: Reliabilities of and correlations among five standard methods of assessing the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine. Spine 31:258525912006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Penning L: Normal movements of the cervical spine. AJR Am J Roentgenol 130:3173261978

  • 22

    Rao RDGourab KDavid KS: Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:161916402006

  • 23

    Shedid DBenzel EC: Cervical spondylosis anatomy: pathophysiology and biomechanics. Neurosurgery 60:1 SupplS7S132007

  • 24

    Shrout PEFleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:4204281979

  • 25

    Steinmetz MPStewart TJKager CDBenzel ECVaccaro AR: Cervical deformity correction. Neurosurgery 60:1 SupplS90S972007

  • 26

    Suda KAbumi KIto MShono YKaneda KFujiya M: Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive opendoor laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 28:125812622003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Suk KSKim KTLee JHLee SHLim YJKim JS: Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty. Spine 32:E656E6602007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Yaszemski MJWhite AAPanjabi MMBiomechanics of the spine. Fardon DFGarfin SR: Orthopedic Knowledge Update Chicago, IllinoisAmerican Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Press2002. 1522

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 165 163 9
Full Text Views 84 69 0
PDF Downloads 81 54 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar