Cervical laminoforaminotomy for the treatment of cervical degenerative radiculopathy

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey—New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey;
  • | 2 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa;
  • | 3 Division of Neurological Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama;
  • | 4 Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and
  • | 11 Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin;
  • | 5 Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts;
  • | 6 Division of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, California;
  • | 7 Department of Neurological Surgery, Neurological Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York;
  • | 8 Department of Neurosurgery, University of California at San Francisco, California;
  • | 9 Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York; and
  • | 10 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

The objective of this systematic review was to use evidence-based medicine to examine the efficacy of posterior laminoforaminotomy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.

Methods

The National Library of Medicine and Cochrane Database were queried using MeSH headings and key words relevant to posterior laminoforaminotomy and cervical radiculopathy. Abstracts were reviewed, and studies meeting inclusion criteria were selected. The guidelines group assembled an evidentiary table summarizing the quality of evidence (Classes I–III). Disagreements regarding the level of evidence were resolved through an expert consensus conference. The group formulated recommendations which contained the degree of strength based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines network. Validation was done through peer review by the Joint Guidelines Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Results

Posterior laminoforaminotomy improves clinical outcome in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy resulting from soft lateral cervical disc displacement or cervical spondylosis with resulting narrowing of the lateral recess. All studies were Class III. The most frequent design flaw involved the lack of utilization of validated outcomes measures. In addition, few historical studies included a detailed preoperative analysis of the patients. As such, the vast majority of studies that included both pre- and postoperative assessments with legitimate outcomes measures have been performed since 1990.

Conclusions

Posterior laminoforaminotomy is an effective treatment for cervical radiculopathy.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Adamson TE: Microendoscopic posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for unilateral radiculopathy: results of a new technique in 100 cases. J Neurosurg 95:5157, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Cloward RB: The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 15:602617, 1958

  • 3

    Cloward RB: Vertebral body fusion for ruptured cervical discs. Am J Surg 98:722727, 1959

  • 4

    Davis RA: A long-term outcome study of 170 surgically treated patients with compressive cervical radiculopathy. Surg Neurol 46:523533, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Fessler RG, & Khoo LT: Minimally invasive cervical microendoscopic foraminotomy: an initial clinical experience. Neurosurgery 51:5 Suppl S37S45, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Grieve JP, , Kitchen ND, , Moore AJ, & Marsh HT: Results of posterior cervical foraminotomy for treatment of cervical spondylitic radiculopathy. Br J Neurosurg 14:4043, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Henderson CM, , Hennessy RG, , Shuey HM Jr, & Shackelford EG: Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery 13:504512, 1983

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Herkowitz HN, , Kurz LT, & Overholt DP: Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine 15:10261030, 1990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Korinth MC, , Kruger A, , Oertel MF, & Gilsbach JM: Posterior foraminotomy or anterior discectomy with polymethyl methacrylate interbody stabilization for cervical soft disc disease: results in 292 patients with monoradiculopathy. Spine 31:12071216, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kumar GR, , Maurice-Williams RS, & Bradford R: Cervical foraminotomy: an effective treatment for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Br J Neurosurg 12:563568, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Mixter W, & Barr J: Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med 211:210215, 1934

  • 12

    Prolo DJ, , Oklund SA, & Butcher M: Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 11:601606, 1986

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Radhakrishnan K, , Litchy WJ, , O'Fallon WM, & Kurland LT: Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain 117:325335, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Rodrigues MA, , Hanel RA, , Prevedello DM, , Antoniuk A, & Araujo JC: Posterior approach for soft cervical disc herniation: a neglected technique?. Surg Neurol 55:1722, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Schoggl A, , Reddy M, , Saringer W, & Ungersbock K: Social and economic outcome after posterior microforaminotomy for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Wien Klin Wochenschr 114:200204, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Smith GW, & Robinson RA: The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40-A:607624, 1958

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Spurling RG, & Scoville WB: Lateral rupture of cervical intervertebral disc. A common cause of shoulder and arm pain. Surg Gynecol Obstet 798:350358, 1944

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Tomaras CR, , Blacklock JB, , Parker WD, & Harper RL: Outpatient surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy. J Neurosurg 87:4143, 1997

  • 19

    Witzmann A, , Hejazi N, & Krasznai L: Posterior cervical foraminotomy. A follow-up study of 67 surgically treated patients with compressive radiculopathy. Neurosurg Rev 23:213217, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Zeidman SM, & Ducker TB: Posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for radiculopathy: review of 172 cases. Neurosurgery 33:356362, 1993

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1222 266 22
Full Text Views 157 18 1
PDF Downloads 187 24 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0