Clinical prognostic indicators of surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Restricted access

Object

The objective of this systematic review was to use evidence-based medicine to assess whether clinical factors predict surgical outcomes in patients undergoing cervical surgery.

Methods

The National Library of Medicine and Cochrane Database were queried using MeSH headings and keywords relevant to clinical preoperative factors. Abstracts were reviewed, and studies that met the inclusion criteria were selected. The guidelines group assembled an evidentiary table summarizing the quality of evidence (Classes I–III). Disagreements regarding the level of evidence were resolved through an expert consensus conference. The group formulated recommendations that contained the degree of strength based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines network. Validation was done through peer review by the Joint Guidelines Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Results

Preoperative sensory-evoked potentials may aid in providing prognostic information in selected patients in whom clinical factors do not provide clear guidance (Class II). Age, duration of symptoms, and preoperative neurological function may commonly affect outcome (Class III).

Conclusions

Age, duration of symptoms, and preoperative neurological function should be discussed with patients when surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy is considered. Preoperative sensory-evoked potentials may be considered for patients in whom clinical factors do not provide clear guidance if such information would potentially change therapeutic decisions.

Abbreviations used in this paper: CMCT = central motor conduction time; CSM = cervical spondylotic myelopathy; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; MEP = motor-evoked potential; mJOA = modified JOA; OPLL = ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; SEP = somatosensory-evoked potentials.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Paul G. Matz, M.D., Neurosurgery and Neurology, LLC, 232 South Woods Mill Road, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017. email: matzpg@yahoo.com.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
References
  • 1

    Bednarik JZdenek KVohanka SStejskal LVlach OSchroder R: The value of somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials in predicting and monitoring the effect of therapy in spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Spine 24:159315981999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Benzel ECLancon JKesterson LHadden T: Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 4:2862951991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Chagas HDomingues FAversa AVidal Fonseca ALde Souza JM: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of prospective outcome analysis of anterior decompression and fusion. Surg Neurol 64:1 SupplS30S362005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    De Mattei MPaschero BCocito DCassano DCampanella ARizzo L: Motor evoked potentials in the post-surgical follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Ital J Neurol Sci 16:2392481995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Ebersold MJPare MCQuast LM: Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 82:7457511995

  • 6

    Fujiwara KYonenobu KEbara SYamashita KOno K: The prognosis of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. An analysis of the factors involved. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:3933981989

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Handa YKubota TIshii HSato KTsuchida AArai Y: Evaluation of prognostic factors and clinical outcome in elderly patients in whom expansive laminoplasty is performed for cervical myelopathy due to multisegmental spondylotic canal stenosis. A retrospective comparison with younger patients. J Neurosurg 96:2 Suppl1731792002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Hirabayashi KMiyakawa JSatomi KMaruyama TWakano K: Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 6:3543641981

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Ishida KTani TUshida TZinchk VYamamoto H: Recovery of spinal cord conduction after surgical decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 82:1301362003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Jaskolski DJLaing RJJarratt JAJukubowski J: Pre- and postoperative motor conduction times measured using magnetic stimulation, in patients with cervical spondylosis. Br J Neurosurg 4:1871921990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Kadanka ZMares MBednarik JSmrcka VKrbec MChaloupka R: Predictive factors for mild forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy treated conservatively or surgically. Eur J Neurol 12:16242005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Lyu RKTang LMChen CJChen CMChang HSWu YR: The use of evoked potentials for clinical correlation and surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy with intramedullary high signal intensity on MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:2562612004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Morshita YHida SNaito MMatsushima U: Evaluation of cervical spondyltoic myelopathy using somatosensory-evoked potentials. Int Orthop 29:3433462005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Naderi SOzgen SPamir MNOzek MMErzen C: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting prognosis. Neurosurgery 43:43491998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Nurick S: The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder as associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95:871001972

  • 16

    Okada YIkata TYamada HSakamoto RKatoh S: Magnetic resonance imaging study on the results of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 18:202420291993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Suri AChabbra RPMehta VSGaikwad SPandey RM: Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 3:33452003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Yamazaki TYanaka KSato HUermura KTsukasa ANose T: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting outcome with special reference to age differences. Neurosurgery 52:1221262003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Yonenobu KAbumi KNagata KTaketomi EUeyama K: Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the japanese orthopaedic association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 26:189018952001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 673 654 71
Full Text Views 199 148 2
PDF Downloads 259 132 8
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar