The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Restricted access

Object

The objective of this systematic review was to use evidence-based medicine to delineate the natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and identify factors associated with clinical deterioration.

Methods

The National Library of Medicine and Cochrane Database were queried using MeSH headings and keywords relevant to the natural history of CSM. Abstracts were reviewed and studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. The guidelines group assembled an evidentiary table summarizing the quality of evidence (Classes I–III). Disagreements regarding the level of evidence were resolved through an expert consensus conference. The group formulated recommendations that contained the degree of strength based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines network. Validation was done through peer review by the Joint Guidelines Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Results

The natural history of CSM is mixed: it may manifest as a slow, stepwise decline or there may be a long period of quiescence (Class III). Long periods of severe stenosis are associated with demyelination and may result in necrosis of both gray and white matter. With severe and/or long lasting CSM symptoms, the likelihood of improvement with nonoperative measures is low. Objectively measurable deterioration is rarely seen acutely in patients younger than 75 years of age with mild CSM (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale score > 12; Class I). In patients with cervical stenosis without myelopathy, the presence of abnormal electromyography findings or the presence of clinical radiculopathy is associated with the development of symptomatic CSM in this patient population (Class I).

Conclusions

The natural history of CSM is variable, which may affect treatment decisions.

Abbreviations used in this paper: AP = anteroposterior; ADL = activities of daily living; CSM = cervical spondylotic myelopathy; EMG = electromyography; ISI = increased signal intensity; JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; mJOA = modified JOA; ROM = range of motion; SEP = somatosensory evoked potential.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Paul G. Matz, M.D., Neurosurgery and Neurology, LLC, 232 South Woods Mill Road, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017. email: matzpg@yahoo.com.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Barnes MPSaunders M: The effect of cervical mobility on the natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47:17201984

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Bednarik JKadanka ZDusek LNovotny OSurelova DUrbanek I: Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical cord compression. Spine 29:226022692004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Cardarelli ROberdorfer JR: Evidence-based medicine, part 5. An introduction to critical appraisal of articles on prognosis. J Am Osteopath Assoc 107:3153192007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Clarke ERobinson PK: Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain 79:4835101956

  • 5

    Fujiwara AKobayashi NSaiki KKitagawa TTamai KSaotome K: Association of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score with the Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and short-form 36. Spine 28:160116072003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Ito TOyanagi KTakahashi HTakahashi HEIkuta F: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinicopathologic study on the progression pattern and thin myelinated fibers of the lesions of seven patients examined during complete autopsy. Spine 21:8278331996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Kadanka ZBednarik JVohanka SStejskal LSmrcka VVlach O: Spondylotic cervical myelopathy: three aspects of the problem. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 53:4094182000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Kadanka ZBednarik JVohanka SVlach OStejskal LChaloupka R: Conservative treatment versus surgery in spondylotic cervical myelopathy: a prospective randomised study. Eur Spine J 9:5385442000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kadanka ZMares MBednaník JSmrcka VKrbec MStejskal L: Approaches to spondylotic cervical myelopathy: conservative versus surgical results in a 3-year follow-up study. Spine 27:220522112002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kadanka ZMares MBednarík JSmrcka VKrbec MChaloupka R: Predictive factors for mild forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy treated conservatively or surgically. Eur J Neurol 12:16242005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Lees FTurner JW: Natural history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis. BMJ 2:160716101963

  • 12

    Matsumoto MChiba KIshikawa MMaruiwa HFujimura YToyama Y: Relationships between outcomes of conservative treatment and magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with mild cervical myelopathy caused by soft disc herniations. Spine 26:159215982001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Matsumoto MToyama YIshikawa MChiba KSuzuki NFujimura Y: Increased signal intensity of the spinal cord on magnetic resonance images in cervical compressive myelopathy. Does it predict the outcome of conservative treatment?. Spine 25:6776822000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Nakamura KKurokawa THoshino YSaita KTakeshita KKawaguchi H: Conservative treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: achievement and sustainability of a level of “no disability.”. J Spinal Disord 11:1751791998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Nurick S: The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95:871001972

  • 16

    Ogino HTada KOkada KYonenobu KYamamoto TOno K: Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio, and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine. Spine 8:1151983

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Ono KOta HTada KYamamoto T: Cervical myelopathy secondary to multiple spondylotic protrusions. A clinico-pathologic study. Spine 2:1091251977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Roberts AH: Myelopathy due to cervical spondylosis treated by collar immobilization. Neurology 16:9519541966

  • 19

    Sadasivan KKReddy RPAlbright JA: The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Yale J Biol Med 66:2352421993

  • 20

    Singh ACrockard HA: Comparison of seven different scales used to quantify severity of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and post-operative improvement. J Outcome Meas 5:7988182001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Cited By
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 5987 5130 47
Full Text Views 239 115 15
PDF Downloads 1296 103 6
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar