Biomechanical evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation: a comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl screw techniques

Cédric BarreyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurochirurgical P. Wertheimer, Lyon; Department of Biomechanics, Laboratoire de Mécanique des Solides, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, Villeurbanne; Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Department of Biostatistics, Centre Hospitalier de la Région Annecienne, Annecy; and Department of Anatomy, Lyon Nord. Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France

Search for other papers by Cédric Barrey in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Patrick MertensDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurochirurgical P. Wertheimer, Lyon; Department of Biomechanics, Laboratoire de Mécanique des Solides, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, Villeurbanne; Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Department of Biostatistics, Centre Hospitalier de la Région Annecienne, Annecy; and Department of Anatomy, Lyon Nord. Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France

Search for other papers by Patrick Mertens in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D., Ph.D.
,
Claude RumelhartDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurochirurgical P. Wertheimer, Lyon; Department of Biomechanics, Laboratoire de Mécanique des Solides, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, Villeurbanne; Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Department of Biostatistics, Centre Hospitalier de la Région Annecienne, Annecy; and Department of Anatomy, Lyon Nord. Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France

Search for other papers by Claude Rumelhart in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 Ph.D.
,
François CottonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurochirurgical P. Wertheimer, Lyon; Department of Biomechanics, Laboratoire de Mécanique des Solides, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, Villeurbanne; Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Department of Biostatistics, Centre Hospitalier de la Région Annecienne, Annecy; and Department of Anatomy, Lyon Nord. Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France

Search for other papers by François Cotton in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Jérôme JundDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurochirurgical P. Wertheimer, Lyon; Department of Biomechanics, Laboratoire de Mécanique des Solides, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, Villeurbanne; Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Department of Biostatistics, Centre Hospitalier de la Région Annecienne, Annecy; and Department of Anatomy, Lyon Nord. Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France

Search for other papers by Jérôme Jund in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
, and
Gilles PerrinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurochirurgical P. Wertheimer, Lyon; Department of Biomechanics, Laboratoire de Mécanique des Solides, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées, Villeurbanne; Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Bénite; Department of Biostatistics, Centre Hospitalier de la Région Annecienne, Annecy; and Department of Anatomy, Lyon Nord. Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France

Search for other papers by Gilles Perrin in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $384.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $624.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $384.00
USD  $624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

Object. The purpose of this study was to assess human cervical spine pullout force after lateral mass fixation involving two different techniques: the Roy-Camille and the Magerl techniques. Although such comparisons have been conducted previously, because of the heterogeneity of results and the importance of this procedure in clinical practice, it is essential to have data derived from a prospective and randomized biomechanical study involving a sufficient sample of human cervical spines. The authors also evaluated the influence of the sex, the vertebral level, the bone mineral density (BMD), the length of bone purchase, and the thickness of the anterior cortical purchase.

Methods. Twenty-one adult cervical spines were harvested from fresh human cadavers. Computerized tomography was performed before and after placing 3.5-mm titanium lateral mass screws from C-3 to C-6. Pullout forces were evaluated using a material testing machine. The load was applied until the pullout of the screw was observed. A total of 152 pullout tests were available, 76 for each type of screw fixation. The statistical analysis was mainly performed using the Kaplan—Meier survival method.

The mean pullout force was 266 ± 124 N for the Roy-Camille technique and 231 ± 94 N for the Magerl technique (p < 0.025). For the C3–4 specimen group, Roy-Camille screws were demonstrated to exert a significantly higher resistance to pullout forces (299 ± 114 N) compared with Magerl screws (242 ± 97 N), whereas no difference was found between the two techniques for the C5–6 specimen group (Roy-Camille 236 ± 122 N and Magerl 220 ± 86 N). Independent of the procedure, pullout strengths were greater at the C3–4 level (271 ± 114 N) than the C5–6 level (228 ± 105 N) (p < 0.05).

No significant correlation between the cancellous BMD, the thickness of the anterior cortical purchase, the length of bone purchase, and maximal pullout forces was found for either technique.

Conclusions. The difference between pullout forces associated with the Roy-Camille and the Magerl techniques was not as significant as has been previously suggested in the literature. It was interesting to note the influence of the vertebral level: Roy-Camille screws demonstrated greater pullout strength (23%) at the C3–4 vertebral level than Magerl screws but no significant difference between the techniques was observed at C5–6.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1.

    Albert TJ, , Klein GR, & Joffe D, et al: Use of cervicothoracic junction pedicle screws for reconstruction of complex cervical spine pathology. Spine 23:15961599, 1998 Albert TJ, Klein GR, Joffe D, et al: Use of cervicothoracic junction pedicle screws for reconstruction of complex cervical spine pathology. Spine 23:1596–1599, 1998

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Choueka J, , Spivak JM, & Kummer FJ, et al: Flexion failure of posterior cervical lateral mass screws. Influence of insertion technique and position. Spine 21:462468, 1996 Choueka J, Spivak JM, Kummer FJ, et al: Flexion failure of posterior cervical lateral mass screws. Influence of insertion technique and position. Spine 21:462–468, 1996

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Coe JD, , Warden KE, & Sutterlin CE, et al: Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spinal stabilization methods in a human cadaveric model. Spine 14:11221131, 1989 Coe JD, Warden KE, Sutterlin CE, et al: Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spinal stabilization methods in a human cadaveric model. Spine 14:1122–1131, 1989

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Cooper PR: The Axis Fixation System for posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 39:612614, 1996 Cooper PR: The Axis Fixation System for posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 39:612–614, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Ebraheim NA, , Rupp RE, & Savolaine ER, et al: Posterior plating of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord 8:111115, 1995 Ebraheim NA, Rupp RE, Savolaine ER, et al: Posterior plating of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord 8:111–115, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Errico T, , Uhl R, & Cooper P, et al: Pullout strength comparison of two methods of orienting screw insertion in the lateral masses of the bovine cervical spine. J Spinal Disord 5:459463, 1992 Errico T, Uhl R, Cooper P, et al: Pullout strength comparison of two methods of orienting screw insertion in the lateral masses of the bovine cervical spine. J Spinal Disord 5:459–463, 1992

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Getty R: The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1988, pp 742743 Getty R: The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1988, pp 742–743

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Grubb MR, , Currier BL, & Stone J, et al: Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy. Spine 22:19481954, 1997 Grubb MR, Currier BL, Stone J, et al: Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy. Spine 22:1948–1954, 1997

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Harris BM, , Hilibrand AS, & Nien Y, et al: A comparison of three screw types for unicortical fixation of the lateral mass of the cervical spine. Spine 26:24272431, 2001 Harris BM, Hilibrand AS, Nien Y, et al: A comparison of three screw types for unicortical fixation of the lateral mass of the cervical spine. Spine 26:2427–2431, 2001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Heller JG, , Carlson GD, & Abitbol JJ, et al: Anatomic comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques for screw placement in the lower cervical spine. Spine 16:S552S557, 1991 Heller JG, Carlson GD, Abitbol JJ, et al: Anatomic comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques for screw placement in the lower cervical spine. Spine 16:S552–S557, 1991

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Heller JG, , Estes BT, & Zaouali M, et al: Biomechanical study of screws in the lateral masses: variables affecting pull-out resistance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:13151321, 1996 Heller JG, Estes BT, Zaouali M, et al: Biomechanical study of screws in the lateral masses: variables affecting pull-out resistance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1315–1321, 1996

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Heller JG, , Silcox DH, & Sutterlin CE: Complications of posterior cervical plating. Spine 20:24422448, 1995 Heller JG, Silcox DH, Sutterlin CE: Complications of posterior cervical plating. Spine 20:2442–2448, 1995

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Jeanneret B, , Magerl F, & Ward H, et al: Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates. Spine 16: S56S63, 1991 Jeanneret B, Magerl F, Ward H, et al: Posterior stabilization of the cervical spine with hook plates. Spine 16: S56–S63, 1991

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Jones EL, , Heller JG, & Silcox DH, et al: Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine 22:977982, 1997 Jones EL, Heller JG, Silcox DH, et al: Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine 22:977–982, 1997

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Jonsson H Jr, & Rauschning W: Anatomical and morphometric studies in posterior cervical spinal screw-plate systems. J Spinal Disord 7:429438, 1994 Jonsson H Jr, Rauschning W: Anatomical and morphometric studies in posterior cervical spinal screw-plate systems. J Spinal Disord 7:429–438, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Kalender WA: A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications. Med Phys 19:583586, 1992 Kalender WA: A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications. Med Phys 19:583–586, 1992

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Klekamp JW, , Ugbo JL, & Heller JG, et al: Cervical transfacet versus lateral mass screws: a biomechanical comparison. J Spinal Disord 13:515518, 2000 Klekamp JW, Ugbo JL, Heller JG, et al: Cervical transfacet versus lateral mass screws: a biomechanical comparison. J Spinal Disord 13:515–518, 2000

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Lim TH, , An H, & Evanich C, et al: Strength of anterior vertebral screw fixation in relationship to bone mineral density. J Spinal Disord 8:121125, 1995 Lim TH, An H, Evanich C, et al: Strength of anterior vertebral screw fixation in relationship to bone mineral density. J Spinal Disord 8:121–125, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Lindsey RW, & Miclau T: Posterior lateral mass plate fixation of the cervical spine. J South Orthop Assoc 9:3642, 2000 Lindsey RW, Miclau T: Posterior lateral mass plate fixation of the cervical spine. J South Orthop Assoc 9:36–42, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    McCullen GM, & Garfin SR: Spine update: cervical spine internal fixation using screw and screw-plate constructs. Spine 25:643652, 2000 McCullen GM, Garfin SR: Spine update: cervical spine internal fixation using screw and screw-plate constructs. Spine 25:643–652, 2000

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Mihara H, , Cheng BC, & David SM, et al: Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation. Spine 26:16621667, 2001 Mihara H, Cheng BC, David SM, et al: Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervical fixation. Spine 26:1662–1667, 2001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Montesano PX, , Juach EC, & Anderson PA, et al: Biomechanics of cervical spine internal fixation. Spine 16:S10S16, 1991 Montesano PX, Juach EC, Anderson PA, et al: Biomechanics of cervical spine internal fixation. Spine 16:S10–S16, 1991

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Montesano PX, , Jauch E, & Jonsson H Jr: Anatomic and biomechanical study of posterior cervical spine plate arthrodesis: an evaluation of two different techniques of screw placement. J Spinal Disord 5:301305, 1992 Montesano PX, Jauch E, Jonsson H Jr: Anatomic and biomechanical study of posterior cervical spine plate arthrodesis: an evaluation of two different techniques of screw placement. J Spinal Disord 5:301–305, 1992

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Muffoletto AJ, , Hadjipavlou AG, & Jensen RE, et al: Techniques and pitfalls of cervical lateral mass plate fixation. Am J Orthop 29:897903, 2000 Muffoletto AJ, Hadjipavlou AG, Jensen RE, et al: Techniques and pitfalls of cervical lateral mass plate fixation. Am J Orthop 29:897–903, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Pearson J, , Dequeker J, & Henley M, et al: European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int 5:174184, 1995 Pearson J, Dequeker J, Henley M, et al: European semi-anthropomorphic spine phantom for the calibration of bone densitometers: assessment of precision, stability and accuracy. The European Quantitation of Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int 5:174–184, 1995

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Roy-Camille R, , Garcon P, & Begue TH, et al: Etude bioméchanique de l' ancrage des vis pédiculaires dorsales et lombaires. Rachis 3:109114, 1991 Roy-Camille R, Garcon P, Begue TH, et al: Etude bioméchanique de l' ancrage des vis pédiculaires dorsales et lombaires. Rachis 3:109–114, 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Roy-Camille R, , Saillant G, & Mazel C: Internal fixation of the unstable cervical spine by a posterior osteosynthesis with plates and screws, in Cervical Spine Research Society (eds): The Cervical Spine. New York: Lippincott, 1989, pp 390403 Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C: Internal fixation of the unstable cervical spine by a posterior osteosynthesis with plates and screws, in Cervical Spine Research Society (eds): The Cervical Spine. New York: Lippincott, 1989, pp 390–403

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Seybold EA, , Baker JA, & Criscitiello AA, et al: Characteristics of unicortical and bicortical lateral mass screws in the cervical spine. Spine 24:23972403, 1999 Seybold EA, Baker JA, Criscitiello AA, et al: Characteristics of unicortical and bicortical lateral mass screws in the cervical spine. Spine 24:2397–2403, 1999

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Skinner R, , Maybee J, & Transfeldt E, et al: Experimental pullout testing and comparison of variables in transpedicular screw fixation. A biomechanical study. Spine 15:195201, 1990 Skinner R, Maybee J, Transfeldt E, et al: Experimental pullout testing and comparison of variables in transpedicular screw fixation. A biomechanical study. Spine 15:195–201, 1990

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Smith ME, , Cibischino M, & Langrana NA, et al: A biomechanical study of a cervical spine stabilization device: Roy-Camille plates. Spine 22:3843, 1997 Smith ME, Cibischino M, Langrana NA, et al: A biomechanical study of a cervical spine stabilization device: Roy-Camille plates. Spine 22:38–43, 1997

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Swank ML, , Sutterlin CE, & Bossons CR, et al: Rigid internal fixation with lateral mass plates in multilevel anterior and posterior reconstruction of the cervical spine. Spine 22:274282, 1997 Swank ML, Sutterlin CE, Bossons CR, et al: Rigid internal fixation with lateral mass plates in multilevel anterior and posterior reconstruction of the cervical spine. Spine 22:274–282, 1997

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Traynelis VC: Anterior and posterior plate stabilization of the cervical spine. Neurosurg Q 2:5976, 1992 Traynelis VC: Anterior and posterior plate stabilization of the cervical spine. Neurosurg Q 2:59–76, 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Ulrich C, , Arand M, & Nothwang J: Internal fixation on the lower cervical spine—biomechanics and clinical practice of procedures and implants. Eur Spine J 10:88100, 2001 Ulrich C, Arand M, Nothwang J: Internal fixation on the lower cervical spine—biomechanics and clinical practice of procedures and implants. Eur Spine J 10:88–100, 2001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Ulrich C, , Woersdoerfer O, & Kalff R, et al: Biomechanics of fixation systems to the cervical spine. Spine 16:S4S9, 1991 Ulrich C, Woersdoerfer O, Kalff R, et al: Biomechanics of fixation systems to the cervical spine. Spine 16:S4–S9, 1991

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Wellman BJ, , Follett KA, & Traynelis VC: Complications of posterior articular mass plate fixation of the subaxial cervical spine in 43 consecutive patients. Spine 23:193200, 1998 Wellman BJ, Follett KA, Traynelis VC: Complications of posterior articular mass plate fixation of the subaxial cervical spine in 43 consecutive patients. Spine 23:193–200, 1998

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Xu R, , Ebraheim NA, & Klausner T, et al: Modified Magerl technique of lateral mass screw placement in the lower cervical spine: an anatomic study. J Spinal Disord 11:237240, 1998 Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Klausner T, et al: Modified Magerl technique of lateral mass screw placement in the lower cervical spine: an anatomic study. J Spinal Disord 11:237–240, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Xu R, , Ebraheim NA, & Yeasting R, et al: Anatomy of C7 lateral mass and projection of pedicle axis on its posterior aspect. J Spinal Disord 8:116120, 1995 Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting R, et al: Anatomy of C7 lateral mass and projection of pedicle axis on its posterior aspect. J Spinal Disord 8:116–120, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1116 212 15
Full Text Views 187 22 0
PDF Downloads 203 33 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0