Surgical results of intramedullary spinal cord tumor with spinal cord monitoring to guide extent of resection

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

The authors investigated the outcome of intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery, focusing on the effect of preoperative neurological status on postoperative mobility and the extent of tumor excision guided by intraoperative spinal cord monitoring prospectively.

Methods

Intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery was performed in 131 patients between 1997 and 2007. The authors compared the pre- and postoperative neurological status and examined the type of surgery in 106 of these patients. A modified McCormick Scale (Grades I–V) was used to assess ambulatory ability (I = normal ambulation; II = mild motor sensory deficit, independent without external aid; III = independent with external aid; IV = care required; and V = wheelchair required). The type of surgery was classified into 4 levels: total resection, subtotal resection, partial resection, and biopsy.

Results

The 106 patients consisted of 47 females and 59 males, whose average age was 42.5 years (range 6–75 years). The mean follow-up period was 7.3 years (range 2.5 months–21 years). The tumor types included astrocytoma (12 cases), ependymoma (46 cases), hemangioblastoma (16 cases), cavernous hemangioma (17 cases), and others (15 cases overall: gangliocytoma, 1; germ cell tumor, 1; lymphoma, 3; neurinoma, 1; meningioma, 1; oligodendroglioma, 1; sarcoidosis, 2; glioma, 1; and unknown, 4). Initial total excision, subtotal resection, partial resection, biopsy, and duraplasty were performed in 59, 12, 22, 12, and 1 patients, respectively. According to the preoperative McCormick Scale, ambulatory status was classified as Grades I, II, III, IV, and V in 41(38%), 30 (28%), 14 (13%), 19 (19%), and 2 (2%) patients, respectively. Thirty-three (31%) of 106 patients suffered postoperative neurological deterioration. The number of patients who did not lose ambulatory ability or who achieved an ambulatory status of Grade I or II postoperatively was 33 (80%), 21 (70%), 10 (71%), 8 (42%), and 1 (50%) in patients with preoperative Grades I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. Total excision was performed in 31 (79%) of 39 patients with preoperative Grade I, 12 (40%) of 30 patients with Grade II, 7 (50%) of 14 patients with Grade III, and 9 of 21 patients (38%) with Grade IV or V, indicating that the rate of total excision was significantly higher in patients with Grade I status.

Conclusions

The postoperative ambulatory ability was excellent in patients with a good preoperative neurological status. Total excision in patients with Grade I or II ambulation was associated with a good prognosis for postoperative mobility. However, the rate of postoperative deterioration was 31.5%, which is relatively high, and patients should be fully informed of this concern prior to intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery.

Abbreviations used in this paper: CMAP = compound muscle action potential; IMSCT = intramedullary spinal cord tumor; MEP = motor evoked potential; SSEP = somatosensory evoked potential.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Yukihiro Matsuyama, M.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 65 Tsuruma-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan. email: spine-yu@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Brotchi J: Intrinsic spinal cord tumor resection. Neurosurgery 50:105910632002

  • 2

    Calancie BHarris WBrindle GFGreen BALandy HJ: Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction. J Neurosurg 95:1611682001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Constantini SMiller DCAllen JCRorke LBFreed DEpstein FJ: Radical excision of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: surgical morbidity and long-term follow-up evaluation in 164 children and young adults. J Neurosurg 2 Suppl93:1831932000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Cooper PREpstein F: Radical resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors in adults. Recent experience in 29 patients. J Neurosurg 63:4924991985

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Cristante LHerrmann HD: Surgical management of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: functional outcome and sources of morbidity. Neurosurgery 35:69761994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Epstein F: Spinal cord astrocytomas of childhood. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 13:1351691986

  • 7

    Epstein FJFarmer JPFreed D: Adult intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas: the result of surgery in 38 patients. J Neurosurg 79:2042091993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Goh KYVelasquez LEpstein FJ: Pediatric intramedullary spinal cord tumors: is surgery alone enough?. Pediatr Neurosurg 27:34391997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hanbali FFourney DRMarmor ESuki DRhines LDWeinberg JS: Spinal cord ependymoma: radical surgical resection and outcome. Neurosurgery 51:116211742002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Hoshimaru MKoyama THashimoto NKikuchi H: Results of microsurgical treatment for intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas: analysis of 36 cases. Neurosurgery 44:2642691999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Jallo GIFreed DEpstein F: Intramedullary spinal cord tumors in children. Childs Nerv Syst 19:6416492003

  • 12

    Jallo GIKothbauer KFEpstein FJ: Intrinsic spinal cord tumor resection. Neurosurgery 49:112411282001

  • 13

    Kane PJel-Mahdy WSingh APowell MPCrockard HA: Spinal intradural tumors: Part II—Intramedullary. Br J Neurosurg 13:5585631999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kothbauer KF: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery. Neurophysiol Clin 37:4074142007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Kothbauer KFDeletis VEpstein FJ: Intraoperative monitoring. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:54551998

  • 16

    Kothbauer KDeletis VEpstein FJ: Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring for intramedullary surgery: an essential adjunct. Pediatr Neurosurg 26:2472541997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Kothbauer KFDeletis VEpstein FJ: Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical neurophysiological data in a series of 100 consecutive procedures. Neurosurg Focus 4:E11998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Mantel N: Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:1631701966

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    McCormick PCStein BM: Intramedullary tumors in adults. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1:6096301990

  • 20

    McCormick PCTorres RPost KDStein BM: Intramedullary ependymoma of the spinal cord. J Neurosurg 72:5235321990

  • 21

    Morota NDeletis VConstantini SKofler MCohen HEpstein FJ: The role of motor evoked potentials during surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Neurosurgery 41:132713361997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Quiñones-Hinojosa ALyon RZada GLamborn KRGupta NParsa AT: Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection correlate with postoperative motor function. Neurosurgery 56:9829932005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Sala FAlbino BFranco FPaola LMassimo G: Surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: the role of intraoperative (neurophysiological) monitoring. Eur Spine J 16:S130S1392007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Sala FPalandri GBasso ELanteri PDeletis VFaccioli F: Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study. Neurosurgery 58:112911432006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Samii MKlekamp J: Surgical results of 100 intramedullary tumors in relation to accompanying syringomyelia. Neurosurgery 35:8658731994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Sandalcioglu IEGasser TWiedemayer HHorsch SStolke D: Favourable outcome after biopsy and decompression of a holocord intramedullary spinal cord astrocytoma in a newborn. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 6:1791822002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Schwartz THMcCormick PC: Intramedullary ependymomas: clinical presentation, surgical treatment strategies and prognosis. J Neurooncol 47:2112182000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Shrivastava RKEpstein FJPerin NIPost KDJallo GI: Intramedullary spinal cord tumor in patients older than 50 years of age: management and outcome analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2:2492552005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 347 312 38
Full Text Views 127 77 1
PDF Downloads 146 56 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar