The authors investigated the outcome of intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery, focusing on the effect of preoperative neurological status on postoperative mobility and the extent of tumor excision guided by intraoperative spinal cord monitoring prospectively.
Intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery was performed in 131 patients between 1997 and 2007. The authors compared the pre- and postoperative neurological status and examined the type of surgery in 106 of these patients. A modified McCormick Scale (Grades I–V) was used to assess ambulatory ability (I = normal ambulation; II = mild motor sensory deficit, independent without external aid; III = independent with external aid; IV = care required; and V = wheelchair required). The type of surgery was classified into 4 levels: total resection, subtotal resection, partial resection, and biopsy.
The 106 patients consisted of 47 females and 59 males, whose average age was 42.5 years (range 6–75 years). The mean follow-up period was 7.3 years (range 2.5 months–21 years). The tumor types included astrocytoma (12 cases), ependymoma (46 cases), hemangioblastoma (16 cases), cavernous hemangioma (17 cases), and others (15 cases overall: gangliocytoma, 1; germ cell tumor, 1; lymphoma, 3; neurinoma, 1; meningioma, 1; oligodendroglioma, 1; sarcoidosis, 2; glioma, 1; and unknown, 4). Initial total excision, subtotal resection, partial resection, biopsy, and duraplasty were performed in 59, 12, 22, 12, and 1 patients, respectively. According to the preoperative McCormick Scale, ambulatory status was classified as Grades I, II, III, IV, and V in 41(38%), 30 (28%), 14 (13%), 19 (19%), and 2 (2%) patients, respectively. Thirty-three (31%) of 106 patients suffered postoperative neurological deterioration. The number of patients who did not lose ambulatory ability or who achieved an ambulatory status of Grade I or II postoperatively was 33 (80%), 21 (70%), 10 (71%), 8 (42%), and 1 (50%) in patients with preoperative Grades I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. Total excision was performed in 31 (79%) of 39 patients with preoperative Grade I, 12 (40%) of 30 patients with Grade II, 7 (50%) of 14 patients with Grade III, and 9 of 21 patients (38%) with Grade IV or V, indicating that the rate of total excision was significantly higher in patients with Grade I status.
The postoperative ambulatory ability was excellent in patients with a good preoperative neurological status. Total excision in patients with Grade I or II ambulation was associated with a good prognosis for postoperative mobility. However, the rate of postoperative deterioration was 31.5%, which is relatively high, and patients should be fully informed of this concern prior to intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery.
Abbreviations used in this paper: CMAP = compound muscle action potential; IMSCT = intramedullary spinal cord tumor; MEP = motor evoked potential; SSEP = somatosensory evoked potential.
Address correspondence to: Yukihiro Matsuyama, M.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 65 Tsuruma-Cho, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan. email:
ConstantiniSMillerDCAllenJCRorkeLBFreedDEpsteinFJ: Radical excision of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: surgical morbidity and long-term follow-up evaluation in 164 children and young adults. J Neurosurg2 Suppl93:183–1932000
ConstantiniS, MillerDC, AllenJC, RorkeLB, FreedD, EpsteinFJ: Radical excision of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: surgical morbidity and long-term follow-up evaluation in 164 children and young adults. 2 Suppl93:183–193, 2000)| false
KothbauerKFDeletisVEpsteinFJ: Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical neurophysiological data in a series of 100 consecutive procedures. Neurosurg Focus4:E11998
KothbauerKF, DeletisV, EpsteinFJ: Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical neurophysiological data in a series of 100 consecutive procedures. 4:E1, 1998)| false
Quiñones-HinojosaALyonRZadaGLambornKRGuptaNParsaAT: Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection correlate with postoperative motor function. Neurosurgery56:982–9932005
Quiñones-HinojosaA, LyonR, ZadaG, LambornKR, GuptaN, ParsaAT, : Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection correlate with postoperative motor function. 56:982–993, 2005)| false
SalaFPalandriGBassoELanteriPDeletisVFaccioliF: Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study. Neurosurgery58:1129–11432006
SalaF, PalandriG, BassoE, LanteriP, DeletisV, FaccioliF, : Motor evoked potential monitoring improves outcome after surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a historical control study. 58:1129–1143, 2006)| false