The posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical disc/osteophyte disease: a single-surgeon experience with a minimum of 5 years' clinical and radiographic follow-up

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

This study details long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes following single-level posterior cervical foraminotomy for degenerative disc or osteophyte disease.

Methods

The authors conducted a retrospective review of 162 cases involving patients treated by a single surgeon using a posterior cervical foraminotomy. Inclusion criteria were a minimum of 5 years' clinical and radiographic follow-up and unilateral single-level posterior cervical foraminotomy for degenerative disease between C-3 and C-7. Patients who had undergone previous operations, those who underwent bilateral procedures, and those who underwent foraminotomy as part of a larger laminectomy were excluded. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) was used for clinical follow-up, and radiographic follow-up was performed using static and dynamic lateral radiographs to compare focal and segmental alignment and changes in disc-space height.

Results

The mean presenting NDI score was 18 (range 2–39). The most common presenting symptoms were radiculopathy (110 patients [68%]), neck pain (85 patients [52%]), and subjective weakness (91 patients [56%]). The mean preoperative focal angulation at the surgically treated level was 4.2° (median 4.1°, range 7.3–15.3°), and the mean preoperative segmental curvature between C-2 and C-7 was 18.0° (median 19.3°, range −22.1 to 39.3°). The mean postoperative NDI score was 8 (range 0–39). Improvement in NDI scores was seen in 150 patients (93%). Resolution of radiculopathy was experienced by 104 patients (95% of patients with radiculopathy). The mean radiographic follow-up was 77.3 months (range 60–177 months). No statistically significant changes in focal or segmental kyphosis or disc-space height were seen among the overall cohort with time (Cox proportional hazards analysis and Student t-test, p > 0.05). The mean postoperative focal angulation was 4.1° (median 3.9°, range −9.9° to 15.1°) and mean postoperative segmental angulation was 17.6° (median 15.4°, range −40.2 to 35.3°). Postoperative instability on dynamic imaging was present in 8 patients (4.9%); 7 of these patients were clinically asymptomatic and were treated conservatively, and 1 required cervical fusion. Postoperative loss of lordosis (defined as segmental Cobb angle < 10°) was seen in 30 patients (20%), 9 of whom had clinical symptoms and 4 of whom required further surgical correction. Factors associated with worsening sagittal alignment (Cox proportional hazards analysis, p < 0.05) included age > 60 at initial surgery, the presence of preoperative cervical lordosis of < 10°, and the need for posterior surgery after the initial foraminotomy

Conclusions

The posterior cervical foraminotomy is highly effective in treating patients with cervical radiculopathy and results in long-lasting pain relief and improved quality-of-life outcomes in most patients. Long-term radiographic follow-up shows no significant trend toward kyphosis, although select patient subsets (patients older than 60 years, patients who had previous posterior surgery, and patients with < 10° of lordosis preoperatively) appear to be at higher risk and require closer follow-up.

Abbreviations used in this paper: ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; NDI = Neck Disability Index; VB = vertebral body.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: John A. Jane Sr., M.D., Ph.D., Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Box 800212, Charlottesville, Virginia 22902. email: jj5a@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
References
  • 1

    Albert TJVacarro A: Postlaminectomy kyphosis. Spine 23:273827451998

  • 2

    Anderson DGSilber JSAlbert TJManagment of cervical kyphosis caused by surgery, degenerative disease, or trauma. Clark CR: The Cervical Spine ed 4PhiladelphiaLippinncott Williams & Wilkins2005. 11351146

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Aronson DDKahn RHCanady ABollinger ROTowbin R: Instability of the cervical spine after decompression in patients who have Arnold-Chiari malformation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:8989061991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Baba HChen QUchida KImura SMorikawa STomita K: Laminoplasty with foraminotomy for coexisting cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy: a preliminary report. Spine 21:1962021996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Bell DFWalker JLO'Connor GTibshirani R: Spinal deformity after multiple-level cervical laminectomy in children. Spine 19:4064111994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Bush KHillier S: Outcome of cervical radiculopathy treated with periradicular/epidural corticosteroid injections: a prospective study with independent clinical review. Eur Spine J 5:3193251996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Carette SFehlings MG: Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med 353:3923992005

  • 8

    Fouyas IPStatham PFSandercock PA: Cochrane review on the role of surgery in cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy. Spine 27:7367472002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Gregorius FKEstrin TCrandall PH: Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy. A long-term follow-up study. Arch Neurol 33:6186251976

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Guigui PBenoist MDeburge A: Spinal deformity and instability after multilevel cervical laminectomy for spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 23:4404471998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Henderson CMHennessy RGShuey HM JrShackelford EG: Posterior-lateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative technique for cervical radiculopathy: a review of 846 consecutively operated cases. Neurosurgery 13:5045121983

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Herkowitz HNKurz LTOverholt DP: Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation. A comparison between the anterior and posterior approach. Spine 15:102610301990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Hilibrand ASCarlson GDPalumbo MAJones PKBohlman HH: Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:5195281999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Jagannathan JShaffrey CIOskouian RJDumont ASHerrold CSansur CA: Radiographic and clinical outcomes following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and allograft fusion without plate placement or cervical collar. J Neurosurg Spine 8:4204282008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Johnson JPFiller AGMcBride DQBatzdorf U: Anterior cervical foraminotomy for unilateral radicular disease. Spine 25:9059092000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Kaiser MGHaid RW JrSubach BRBarnes BRodts GE Jr: Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery 50:2292382002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Kaptain GJSimmons NEReplogle REPobereskin L: Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg 93:1992042000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Liu JEbraheim NAHaman SPSanford CG JrSairyo KFaizan A: How the increase of the cervical disc space height affects the facet joint: an anatomy study. Spine 31:E350E3542006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    McLaughlin MRWahlig JBPollack IF: Incidence of postlaminectomy kyphosis after Chiari decompression. Spine 22:6136171997

  • 20

    Onimus MDestrumelle NGangloff S: [Surgical treatment of cervical disk displacement. Anterior or posterior approach?]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 81:2963011995. (Fr)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Pal GPSherk HH: The vertical stability of the cervical spine. Spine 13:4474491988

  • 22

    Persson LCCarlsson CACarlsson JY: Long-lasting cervical radicular pain managed with surgery, physiotherapy, or a cervical collar. A prospective, randomized study. Spine 22:7517581997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Pickett GERouleau JPDuggal N: Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine 30:194919542005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Samartzis DShen FHLyon CPhillips MGoldberg EJAn HS: Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?. Spine J 4:6366432004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Saringer WNobauer IReddy MTschabitscher MHoraczek A: Microsurgical anterior cervical foraminotomy (uncoforaminotomy) for unilateral radiculopathy: clinical results of a new technique. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:6856942002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Sears WRDuggal NSekhon LHWilliamson OD: Segmental malalignment with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis–contributing factors. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:1111172007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Sim FHSvien HJBickel WHJanes JM: Swan-neck deformity following extensive cervical laminectomy. A review of twenty-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:5645801974

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Spurling RGScoville WB: Lateral rupture of the cervical intervertebral disks: A common cause of shoulder and arm pain. Surg Gynecol Obstet 78:3503581944

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Tomaras CRBlacklock JBParker WDHarper RL: Outpatient surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy. J Neurosurg 87:41431997

  • 30

    Vernon HMior S: The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14:4094151991

  • 31

    Webb KMKaptain GSheehan JJane JA Sr: Pediculotomy as an adjunct to posterior cervical hemilaminectomy, foraminotomy, and discectomy. Neurosurg Focus 12:1E102002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Williams RW: Microcervical foraminotomy. A surgical alternative for intractable radicular pain. Spine 8:7087161983

  • 33

    Yasuoka SPeterson HALaws ER JrMacCarty CS: Pathogenesis and prophylaxis of postlaminectomy deformity of the spine after multiple level laminectomy: difference between children and adults. Neurosurgery 9:1451521981

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Yasuoka SPeterson HAMacCarty CS: Incidence of spinal column deformity after multilevel laminectomy in children and adults. J Neurosurg 57:4414451982

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Cited By
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 367 367 19
Full Text Views 158 128 6
PDF Downloads 166 95 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar