Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 7 of 7 items for

  • Author or Editor: Howard I. Hurtig x
Clear All Modify Search
Restricted access

Eric C. Raps, David H. Gutmann, James R. Brorson, Michael O'Connor and Howard I. Hurtig

✓ Central nervous system infections with Listeria monocytogenes result in varied clinical syndromes ranging from meningitis to rhomboencephalitis. A case of Listeria meningitis complicated by symptomatic communicating hydrocephalus and hydrostatic cervical cord compression is presented which clinically and radiographically improved with aggressive ventricular drainage.

Restricted access

Tanya Simuni, Jurg L. Jaggi, Heather Mulholland, Howard I. Hurtig, Amy Colcher, Andrew D. Siderowf, Bernard Ravina, Brett E. Skolnick, Reid Goldstein, Matthew B. Stern and Gordon H. Baltuch

Object. Palliative neurosurgery has reemerged as a valid therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD) that is complicated by severe motor fluctuations. Despite great enthusiasm for long-term deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), existing reports on this treatment are limited. The present study was designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of bilateral stimulation of the STN for the treatment of PD.

Methods. In 12 patients with severe PD, electrodes were stereotactically implanted into the STN with the assistance of electrophysiological conformation of the target location. All patients were evaluated preoperatively during both medication-off and -on conditions, as well as postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months during medication-on and -off states and stimulation-on and -off conditions. Tests included assessments based on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and timed motor tests.

The stimulation effect was significant in patients who were in the medication-off state, resulting in a 47% improvement in the UPDRS Part III (Motor Examination) score at 12 months, compared with preoperative status. The benefit was stable for the duration of the follow-up period. Stimulation produced no additional benefit during the medication-on state, however, when compared with patient preoperative status. Significant improvements were made in reducing dyskinesias, fluctuations, and duration of off periods.

Conclusions. This study demonstrates that DBS of the STN is an effective treatment for patients with advanced, medication-refractory PD. Deep brain stimulation of the STN produced robust improvements in motor performance in these severely disabled patients while they were in the medication-off state. Serious adverse events were common in this cohort; however, only two patients suffered permanent sequelae.

Restricted access

Atsushi Umemura, Jurg L. Jaggi, Howard I. Hurtig, Andrew D. Siderowf, Amy Colcher, Matthew B. Stern and Gordon H. Baltuch

Object. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been advocated as a more highly effective and less morbidity-producing alternative to ablative stereotactic surgery in the treatment of medically intractable movement disorders. Nevertheless, the exact incidence of morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure is not well known. In this study the authors reviewed the surgical morbidity and mortality rates in a large series of DBS operations.

Methods. The authors retrospectively analyzed surgical complications in their consecutive series of 179 DBS implantations in 109 patients performed by a single surgical team at one center between July 1998 and April 2002. The mean follow-up period was 20 months.

There were 16 serious adverse events related to surgery in 14 patients (12.8%). There were two perioperative deaths (1.8%), one caused by pulmonary embolism and the second due to aspiration pneumonia. The other adverse events were two pulmonary embolisms, two subcortical hemorrhages, two chronic subdural hematomas, one venous infarction, one seizure, four infections, one cerebrospinal fluid leak, and one skin erosion. The incidence of permanent sequelae was 4.6% (five of 109 patients). The incidence of device-related complications, such as infection or skin erosion, was also 4.6% (five of 109 patients).

Conclusions. There is a significant incidence of adverse events associated with the DBS procedure. Nevertheless, DBS is clinically effective in well-selected patients and should be seriously considered as a treatment option for patients with medically refractory movement disorders.

Restricted access

Kelvin L. Chou, Mark S. Forman, John Q. Trojanowski, Howard I. Hurtig and Gordon H. Baltuch

✓ The authors report the clinicopathological findings in a patient in whom levodopa-responsive parkinsonism developed at 45 years of age. The patient experienced asymmetrical onset of symptoms, sustained benefit from levodopa, and motor fluctuations and dyskinesias, but there were no prominent autonomic, cerebellar, or pyramidal signs. He was diagnosed clinically with Parkinson disease (PD) and underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery 9 years after symptom onset. He did not respond to stimulation or medication postoperatively, however, and died 12 weeks after surgery of repeated aspiration pneumonias. Postmortem examination revealed neuron loss in the substantia nigra and basal ganglia, and numerous α-synuclein—positive glial cytoplasmic inclusions in the subcortical nuclei, cerebellum, and brainstem, findings that established a neuropathological diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA). Furthermore, there was an atypical and robust inflammatory reaction, as well as numerous glial cytoplasmic inclusions surrounding both DBS electrode termination sites. The authors speculate that the presence of α-synuclein in the striatum, combined with the inflammation surrounding the electrodes, contributed to the ineffectiveness of stimulation and dopaminergic medications postoperatively. This case demonstrates the ineffectiveness of DBS in MSA, even when the patient is responsive to levodopa, and emphasizes the need for diagnostic modalities that can be used to distinguish PD from MSA and other parkinsonian syndromes in which the levodopa response pattern is typical of PD.

Restricted access

Galit Kleiner-Fisman, Grace S. Lin Liang, Paul J. Moberg, Anthony C. Ruocco, Howard I. Hurtig, Gordon H. Baltuch, Jurg L. Jaggi and Matthew B. Stern

Object

Medically refractory dystonia has recently been treated using deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the globus pallidus internus (GPI). Outcomes have varied depending on the features of the dystonia. There has been limited literature regarding outcomes for refractory dystonia following DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN).

Methods

Four patients with medically refractory, predominantly cervical dystonia underwent STN DBS. Intraoperative assessments with the patients in a state of general anesthesia were performed to determine the extent of fixed deformities that might predict outcome. Patients were rated using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) preoperatively and 3 and 12 months following surgery by a rater blinded to the study. Mean changes and standard errors of the mean in scores were calculated for each subscore of the two scales. Scores were also analyzed using analysis of variance and probability values were generated. Neuropsychological assessments and quality of life ratings using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were evaluated longitudinally.

Results

Significant improvements were seen in motor (p = 0.04), disability (p = 0.02), and total TWSTRS scores (p = 0.03). Better outcomes were seen in those patients who did not have fixed deformities. There was marked improvement in the mental component score of the SF-36. Neuropsychological function was not definitively impacted as a result of the surgery.

Conclusions

Deep brain stimulation of the STN is a novel target for dystonia and may be an alternative to GPI DBS. Further studies need to be performed to confirm these conclusions and to determine optimal candidates and stimulation parameters.

Full access

Daniel R. Kramer, Casey H. Halpern, Dana L. Buonacore, Kathryn R. McGill, Howard I. Hurtig, Jurg L. Jaggi and Gordon H. Baltuch

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the treatment of choice for otherwise healthy patients with advanced Parkinson disease who are suffering from disabling dyskinesias and motor fluctuations related to dopaminergic therapy. As DBS is an elective procedure, it is essential to minimize the risk of morbidity. Further, precision in targeting deep brain structures is critical to optimize efficacy in controlling motor features. The authors have already established an operational checklist in an effort to minimize errors made during DBS surgery. Here, they set out to standardize a strict, step-by-step approach to the DBS surgery used at their institution, including preoperative evaluation, the day of surgery, and the postoperative course. They provide careful instruction on Leksell frame assembly and placement as well as the determination of indirect coordinates derived from MR images used to target deep brain structures. Detailed descriptions of the operative procedure are provided, outlining placement of the stereotactic arc as well as determination of the appropriate bur hole location, lead placement using electrophysiology, and placement of the internal pulse generator. The authors also include their approach to preventing postoperative morbidity. They believe that a strategic, step-by-step approach to DBS surgery combined with a standardized checklist will help to minimize operating room mistakes that can compromise targeting and increase the risk of complication.