Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 5 of 5 items for :

  • "sagittal alignment" x
  • By Author: Anand, Neel x
  • By Author: Lubelski, Daniel x
Clear All
Free access

examined include presence of interbody fusion, rod diameter, rod material, age and preop sagittal alignment. Methods: A retrospective review of a multicenter, prospective ASD database was conducted. Inclusion criteria: age=18yr, ASD, no revisions between >6wk and <2yrs postop. Spinal pelvic parameters, thoracic kyphosis (TK:T2-T12) and lumbar lordosis (LL:L1-S1) were measured overall and within and outside of the instrumented segments. Changes for SVA, PT, PI-LL, TK, and LL between 6wks-2yrs postop were calculated. Of these pts, the amount of thoracic loss and TL

Full access

30; p<0.001). Conclusions The addition of PPI seems to have a protective effect on the development of PJK. The analysis controlled for preoperative sagittal alignment as well as for correction of PI-LL. HYB was effective in restoring sagittal global alignment and cMIS in maintaining it. Neurosurg Focus Neurosurgical Focus FOC 1092-0684 American Association of Neurological Surgeons 2014.3.FOC-DSPNABSTRACTS Abstract Mayfield Clinical Science 243. Microendoscopic Decompression for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Free access

-0684 American Association of Neurological Surgeons 10.3171/2017.3.FOC-DSPNabstracts 2017.3.FOC-DSPNABSTRACTS Charles Kuntz Scholar Award Presentations (Abstracts 104–123) 119. Laminoplasty vs. Laminectomy-Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Myelopathy: Preliminary Results from the CSM-Study Comparing Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes Vijay Ravindra , MD, MSPH , Jill Curran , MS , Praveen V. Mummaneni , MD , Adam S. Kanter , MD , Erica Fay Bisson , MD, MPH , Robert F. Heary , MD

Free access

greater Charlson comorbidity index (1.1 vs 0.85) than NONOP (n=446), respectively (p<0.05). OP had worse HRQOL scores on all surveys than NONOP (p<0.05). OP and NONOP had similar coronal alignment (p<0.05). OP had worse sagittal spinopelvic alignment for all measures than NONOP except cervical lordosis, TK and pelvic incidence (PI). OP had greater percentage of pure sagittal classification (type S; OP=23%, NON=14%; p<0.05). OP had worse grades for all modifier categories: PT (26% vs 16%), PI-lumbar lordosis mismatch (37% vs 21%) and global sagittal alignment (29% vs 9