Developing a 3D composite training model for cranial remodeling

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York;
  • | 2 Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York; and
  • | 3 NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital–Columbia and Cornell in New York, New York
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Craniosynostosis correction, including cranial vault remodeling, fronto-orbital advancement (FOA), and endoscopic suturectomy, requires practical experience with complex anatomy and tools. The infrequent exposure to complex neurosurgical procedures such as these during residency limits extraoperative training. Lack of cadaveric teaching tools given the pediatric nature of synostosis compounds this challenge. The authors sought to create lifelike 3D printed models based on actual cases of craniosynostosis in infants and incorporate them into a practical course for endoscopic and open correction. The authors hypothesized that this training tool would increase extraoperative facility and familiarity with cranial vault reconstruction to better prepare surgeons for in vivo procedures.

METHODS

The authors utilized representative craniosynostosis patient scans to create 3D printed models of the calvaria, soft tissues, and cranial contents. Two annual courses implementing these models were held, and surveys were completed by participants (n = 18, 5 attending physicians, 4 fellows, 9 residents) on the day of the course. These participants were surveyed during the course and 1 year later to assess the impact of this training tool. A comparable cohort of trainees who did not participate in the course (n = 11) was also surveyed at the time of the 1-year follow-up to assess their preparation and confidence with performing craniosynostosis surgeries.

RESULTS

An iterative process using multiple materials and the various printing parameters was used to create representative models. Participants performed all major surgical steps, and we quantified the fidelity and utility of the model through surveys. All attendees reported that the model was a valuable training tool for open reconstruction (n = 18/18 [100%]) and endoscopic suturectomy (n = 17/18 [94%]). In the first year, 83% of course participants (n = 14/17) agreed or strongly agreed that the skin and bone materials were realistic and appropriately detailed; the second year, 100% (n = 16/16) agreed or strongly agreed that the skin material was realistic and appropriately detailed, and 88% (n = 14/16) agreed or strongly agreed that the bone material was realistic and appropriately detailed. All participants responded that they would use the models for their own personal training and the training of residents and fellows in their programs.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors have developed realistic 3D printed models of craniosynostosis including soft tissues that allow for surgical practice simulation. The use of these models in surgical simulation provides a level of preparedness that exceeds what currently exists through traditional resident training experience. Employing practical modules using such models as part of a standardized resident curriculum is a logical evolution in neurosurgical education and training.

ABBREVIATIONS

ABS = acrylonitrile butadiene styrene; FDM = fused deposition modeling; FOA = fronto-orbital advancement; PA2200 = polyamide 2200; PGY = postgraduate year; PLA = polylactic acid; tPLA = Tough PLA.

Illustration from Proctor and Meara (pp 622–631). Copyright Mark Proctor. Used with permission.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Caitlin Hoffman: NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. ceh2003@med.cornell.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online September 20, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.6.PEDS18773.

Disclosures Du Cheng is supported by a Medical Scientist Training Program grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health, and he is the owner of a pending patent associated with the method of rendering CT scans and the method of manufacturing the 3D composite models described in this manuscript. He also reports ownership in the company CranialSim, which has not yet been formed. Medtronic provided surgical drill sets, Carl Storz provided endoscopic equipment, and Stryker provided surgical equipment and plating tools.

  • 1

    Aggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I, Sains P, Athanasiou T, Darzi A: Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 246:771779, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Armstrong R, Eagleson R, De Ribaupierre S: Patient-specific pipeline to create virtual endoscopic third ventriculostomy scenarios. Stud Health Technol Inform 196:1416, 2014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Breimer GE, Bodani V, Looi T, Drake JM: Design and evaluation of a new synthetic brain simulator for endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 15:8288, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Chae MP, Rozen WM, McMenamin PG, Findlay MW, Spychal RT, Hunter-Smith DJ: Emerging applications of bedside 3D printing in plastic surgery. Front Surg 2:25, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Cheng H, Podolsky DJ, Fisher DM, Wong KW, Lorenz HP, Khosla RK, et al. : Teaching palatoplasty using a high-fidelity cleft palate simulator. Plast Reconstr Surg 141:91e98e, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Choi JW, Kim N: Clinical application of three-dimensional printing technology in craniofacial plastic surgery. Arch Plast Surg 42:267277, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Coelho G, Warf B, Lyra M, Zanon N: Anatomical pediatric model for craniosynostosis surgical training. Childs Nerv Syst 30:20092014, 2014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Fried GM, Feldman LS: Objective assessment of technical performance. World J Surg 32:156, 2008

  • 9

    Malik HH, Darwood AR, Shaunak S, Kulatilake P, El-Hilly AA, Mulki O, et al. : Three-dimensional printing in surgery: a review of current surgical applications. J Surg Res 199:512522, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Mattei TA, Frank C, Bailey J, Lesle E, Macuk A, Lesniak M, et al. : Design of a synthetic simulator for pediatric lumbar spine pathologies. J Neurosurg Pediatr 12:192201, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Podolsky DJ, Fisher DM, Wong Riff KW, Looi T, Drake JM, Forrest CR: Infant robotic cleft palate surgery: a feasibility assessment using a realistic cleft palate simulator. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:455e465e, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Rehder R, Abd-El-Barr M, Hooten K, Weinstock P, Madsen JR, Cohen AR: The role of simulation in neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst 32:4354, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Rodt T, Schlesinger A, Schramm A, Diensthuber M, Rittierodt M, Krauss JK: 3D visualization and simulation of frontoorbital advancement in metopic synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 23:13131317, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Ryan JR, Almefty KK, Nakaji P, Frakes DH: Cerebral aneurysm clipping surgery simulation using patient-specific 3D printing and silicone casting. World Neurosurg 88:175181, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Şentürk S: The simplest cleft palate simulator. J Craniofac Surg 24:1056, 2013

  • 16

    Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM: Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199:115120, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Tai BL, Rooney D, Stephenson F, Liao PS, Sagher O, Shih AJ, et al. : Development of a 3D-printed external ventricular drain placement simulator: technical note. J Neurosurg 123:10701076, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Waran V, Narayanan V, Karuppiah R, Pancharatnam D, Chandran H, Raman R, et al. : Injecting realism in surgical training-initial simulation experience with custom 3D models. J Surg Educ 71:193197, 2014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Weinstock P, Rehder R, Prabhu SP, Forbes PW, Roussin CJ, Cohen AR: Creation of a novel simulator for minimally invasive neurosurgery: fusion of 3D printing and special effects. J Neurosurg Pediatr 20:19, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1542 871 56
Full Text Views 216 69 1
PDF Downloads 194 63 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0