Distress and psychosocial risk in families with newly diagnosed pediatric brain tumors

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

Hospitalization for a newly diagnosed pediatric brain tumor is an extremely stressful time for a family, but this period has not been the focus of rigorous study. The purpose of this study was to quantify distress and psychosocial risk in this population to improve psychosocial care delivery.

METHODS

The authors administered the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0 (PAT) to primary caregivers of all children admitted to Children’s of Alabama with a new brain tumor between April 2016 and August 2017. The DT is a single-item measure of distress (scale range 0–10). The PAT (range 0–7) stratifies families by risk level: a score less than 1.0 indicates universal risk level (risk typically experienced during hospitalization); a score of 1.0–2.0 indicates targeted risk (specific psychosocial difficulties that impact medical treatment); and a score higher than 2.0 indicates clinically significant risk. Demographic and clinical information was abstracted from each child’s medical record. A correlation matrix using nonparametric statistics was created between abstracted data and the DT and PAT scores.

RESULTS

Forty primary caregivers were enrolled (of 49 eligible), with the patient age ranging from newborn to 17 years (mean 7.7 years). Twenty-five (63%) of the children were male, and 24 (60%) were white, non-Hispanic. Mean and median DT scores were 7.2 (SD 2.6) and 7, respectively. However, 12 (30%) rated their distress 10/10, and 85% rated distress 5 or greater. PAT scores ranged from 0.0 to 2.36 with mean and median scores of 0.89 (SD 0.50) and 0.86, respectively. PAT results for 16 (40%) families were in the targeted or clinical range, indicating psychosocial factors that have the potential to interfere with medical treatment. No clinical or demographic variable correlated significantly with the DT or PAT score.

CONCLUSIONS

Families of children with newly diagnosed brain tumors experience high levels of distress and psychosocial risk. This work will serve as the foundation for efforts to standardize psychosocial evaluation for newly diagnosed pediatric neurosurgical patients, and to create protocols that organize existing hospital-based psychosocial support services. These efforts have the potential to improve patient and family satisfaction as well as treatment outcomes.

ABBREVIATIONS DT = Distress Thermometer; PAT = Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0.

Article Information

Correspondence Brandon G. Rocque: University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL. brandon.rocque@childrensal.org.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online October 12, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.PEDS18297.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

References

1

Alderfer MAMougianis IBarakat LPBeele DDiTaranto SHwang WT: Family psychosocial risk, distress, and service utilization in pediatric cancer: predictive validity of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool. Cancer 115 (18 Suppl):433943492009

2

Barrera MHancock KRokeach AAtenafu ECataudella DPunnett A: Does the use of the revised Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PATrev) result in improved quality of life and reduced psychosocial risk in Canadian families with a child newly diagnosed with cancer? Psychooncology 23:1651722014

3

Dolgin MJPhipps SFairclough DLSahler OJZAskins MNoll RB: Trajectories of adjustment in mothers of children with newly diagnosed cancer: a natural history investigation. J Pediatr Psychol 32:7717822007

4

Goebel SMehdorn HM: Measurement of psychological distress in patients with intracranial tumours: the NCCN distress thermometer. J Neurooncol 104:3573642011

5

Holland JCBultz BD: The NCCN guideline for distress management: a case for making distress the sixth vital sign. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 5:372007

6

Kazak AEBarakat LPHwang WTDitaranto SBiros DBeele D: Association of psychosocial risk screening in pediatric cancer with psychosocial services provided. Psychooncology 20:7157232011

7

Kazak AEBrier MAlderfer MAReilly AFooks Parker SRogerwick S: Screening for psychosocial risk in pediatric cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 59:8228272012

8

Kazak AERourke MTAlderfer MAPai AReilly AFMeadows AT: Evidence-based assessment, intervention and psychosocial care in pediatric oncology: a blueprint for comprehensive services across treatment. J Pediatr Psychol 32:109911102007

9

Lewandowski LABaranoski MV: Psychological aspects of acute trauma: intervening with children and families in the inpatient setting. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 3:5135291994

10

Melnyk BMAlpert-Gillis LFeinstein NFCrean HFJohnson JFairbanks E: Creating opportunities for parent empowerment: program effects on the mental health/coping outcomes of critically ill young children and their mothers. Pediatrics 113:e597e6072004

11

National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Distress management. Clinical practice guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 1:3443742003

12

Pai ALHPatiño-Fernández AMMcSherry MBeele DAlderfer MAReilly AT: The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT2.0): psychometric properties of a screener for psychosocial distress in families of children newly diagnosed with cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 33:50622008

13

Patel SKFernandez NWong ALMullins WTurk ADekel N: Changes in self-reported distress in end-of-life pediatric cancer patients and their parents using the pediatric distress thermometer. Psychooncology 23:5925962014

14

Patel SKMullins WTurk ADekel NKinjo CSato JK: Distress screening, rater agreement, and services in pediatric oncology. Psychooncology 20:132413332011

15

Selove RKroll TCoppes MCheng Y: Psychosocial services in the first 30 days after diagnosis: results of a web-based survey of Children’s Oncology Group (COG) member institutions. Pediatr Blood Cancer 58:4354402012

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 41 41 41
Full Text Views 35 35 35
PDF Downloads 33 33 33
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar