Endoscopic strip craniectomy with molding helmet therapy versus spring-assisted cranioplasty for nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis: a systematic review

Alexandra Valetopoulou MBBS1, Maria Constantinides MBBS1, Simon Eccles FRCS(Plast)1, Juling Ong FRCS(Plast)1,3, Richard Hayward FRCS1,2,3, David Dunaway FDSRCS, FRCS(Plast)1,3, Noor ul Owase Jeelani MPhil, MBA, FRCS(NeuroSurg)1,2,3, Greg James PhD, FRCS(NeuroSurg)1,2,3, and Adikarige Haritha Dulanka Silva MPhil(Cantab), FRCS(NeuroSurg)1,2
View More View Less
  • 1 Craniofacial Unit, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London;
  • | 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London; and
  • | 3 Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, United Kingdom
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $515.00
USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative molding helmet therapy (ESC-H) and spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) are commonly used minimally invasive techniques for correction of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis, but it is unclear which, if either, is superior. Therefore, the authors undertook a systematic review to compare ESC-H with SAC for the surgical management of nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis.

METHODS

Studies were identified through a systematic and comprehensive search of four databases (Embase, MEDLINE, and two databases in the Cochrane Library). Databases were searched from inception until February 19, 2021. Pediatric patients undergoing either ESC-H or SAC for the management of nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis were included. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, single-patient case reports, mixed cohorts of nonsyndromic and syndromic patients, mixed cohorts of different craniosynostosis types, and studies in which no outcomes of interest were reported were excluded. Outcomes of interest included reoperations, blood transfusion, complications, postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and cephalic index. Pooled summary cohort characteristics were calculated for each outcome of interest. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The study was reported in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were eligible for inclusion in the review, including 1094 patients, of whom 605 (55.3%) underwent ESC-H and 489 (44.7%) underwent SAC for nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. There was no difference between the pooled estimates of the ESC-H and SAC groups for operative time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, and cephalic index. There was no difference between the groups for reoperation rate and complication rate. However, ESC-H was associated with a higher blood transfusion rate and higher postoperative ICU admission.

CONCLUSIONS

The available literature does not demonstrate superiority of either ESC-H or SAC, and outcomes are broadly similar for the treatment of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. However, the evidence is limited by single-center retrospective studies with low methodological quality. There is a need for international multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing both techniques to gain definitive and generalizable data.

ABBREVIATIONS

CI = confidence interval; ESC-H = endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative molding helmet therapy; ICU = intensive care unit; SAC = spring-assisted cranioplasty.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Data (PDF 517 KB)

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $515.00
USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Goyal A, Lu VM, Yolcu YU, Elminawy M, Daniels DJ. Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34(9):16271637.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Delye HHK, Borstlap WA, van Lindert EJ. Endoscopy-assisted craniosynostosis surgery followed by helmet therapy. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9:59.

  • 3

    Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372(71):n71.

  • 4

    Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Accessed July 8, 2022. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinicalepidemiology/oxford.asp

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Berry-Candelario J, Ridgway EB, Grondin RT, Rogers GF, Proctor MR. Endoscope-assisted strip craniectomy and postoperative helmet therapy for treatment of craniosynostosis. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;31(2):E5.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Bonfield CM, Basem J, Cochrane DD, Singhal A, Steinbok P. Examining the need for routine intensive care admission after surgical repair of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis: a preliminary analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;22(6):616619.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Cartwright CC, Jimenez DF, Barone CM, Baker L. Endoscopic strip craniectomy: a minimally invasive treatment for early correction of craniosynostosis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2003;35(3):130138.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Chaichana KL, Jallo GI, Dorafshar AH, Ahn ES. Novel use of an ultrasonic bone-cutting device for endoscopic-assisted craniosynostosis surgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29(7):11631168.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Delye HHK, Arts S, Borstlap WA, et al. Endoscopically assisted craniosynostosis surgery (EACS): the craniofacial team Nijmegen experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(8):10291036.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Gociman B, Marengo J, Ying J, Kestle JRW, Siddiqi F. Minimally invasive strip craniectomy for sagittal synostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(3):825828.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Iyer RR, Uribe-Cardenas R, Ahn ES. Single incision endoscope-assisted surgery for sagittal craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017;33(1):15.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Jimenez DF, Barone CM, Cartwright CC, Baker L. Early management of craniosynostosis using endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomies and cranial orthotic molding therapy. Pediatrics. 2002;110(1 Pt 1):97104.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Magge SN, Lajthia O, Keating RF, Myseros JS, Oluigbo CO, Rogers GF. Minimally invasive endoscopic strip craniectomy for craniosynostosis: outcome data of 100 consecutive cases. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34:20222023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Siddiqi F, Bollo R, Kestle J. Endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomy for non-syndromic sagittal synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27(10):1770.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Woerdeman P, Han S, Verwer B, Muradin M, Stubenitsky B. Endoscopy-assisted versus open repair of sagittal craniosynostosis: the Utrecht experience. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28(5):793.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Shah MN, Kane AA, Petersen JD, Woo AS, Naidoo SD, Smyth MD. Endoscopically assisted versus open repair of sagittal craniosynostosis: the St Louis Children’s Hospital experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;8(2):165170.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Arko L IV, Swanson JW, Fierst TM, et al. Spring-mediated sagittal craniosynostosis treatment at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia: technical notes and literature review. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38(5):E7.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    David LR, Plikaitis CM, Couture D, Glazier SS, Argenta LC. Outcome analysis of our first 75 spring-assisted surgeries for scaphocephaly. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(1):39.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Esparza J, Hinojosa J. Complications in the surgical treatment of craniosynostosis and craniofacial syndromes: apropos of 306 transcranial procedures. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;24(12):14211430.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Mackenzie KA, Davis C, Yang A, MacFarlane MR. Evolution of surgery for sagittal synostosis: the role of new technologies. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(1):129133.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Rodgers W, Glass GE, Schievano S, et al. Spring-assisted cranioplasty for the correction of nonsyndromic scaphocephaly: a quantitative analysis of 100 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(1):125134.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Runyan CM, Gabrick KS, Park JG, et al. Long-term outcomes of spring-assisted surgery for sagittal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(4):833841.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Swanson JW, Haas JA, Mitchell BT, et al. The effects of molding helmet therapy on spring-mediated cranial vault remodeling for sagittal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(6):13981403.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Taylor JA, Maugans TA. Comparison of spring-mediated cranioplasty to minimally invasive strip craniectomy and barrel staving for early treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(4):12251229.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Wong L, Thompson A, Sanger C, et al. Early experience with 30 cases of endoscopic spring assisted surgery for sagittal craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(3):157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Skolnick GB, Yu JL, Patel KB, et al. Comparison of 2 sagittal craniosynostosis repair techniques: spring-assisted surgery versus endoscope-assisted craniectomy with helmet molding therapy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;58(6):678686.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Jimenez DF, Barone CM. Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg. 1998;88(1):7781.

  • 28

    Lauritzen C, Sugawara Y, Kocabalkan O, Olsson R. Spring mediated dynamic craniofacial reshaping. Case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998;32(3):331338.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Jimenez DF, Barone CM. Endoscopic technique for sagittal synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28(9):13331339.

  • 30

    Chan JWH, Stewart CL, Stalder MW, St Hilaire H, McBride L, Moses MH. Endoscope-assisted versus open repair of craniosynostosis: a comparison of perioperative cost and risk. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(1):170174.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Kung TA, Vercler CJ, Muraszko KM, Buchman SR. Endoscopic strip craniectomy for craniosynostosis: do we really understand the indications, outcomes, and risks? J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(2):293298.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    David LR, Proffer P, Hurst WJ, Glazier S, Argenta LC. Spring-mediated cranial reshaping for craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2004;15(5):810818.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Lauritzen CGK, Davis C, Ivarsson A, Sanger C, Hewitt TD. The evolving role of springs in craniofacial surgery: the first 100 clinical cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(2):545554.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1557 1557 600
Full Text Views 138 138 76
PDF Downloads 166 166 102
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0