FEBio finite element model of a pediatric cervical spine

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Biomedical Engineering and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, and
  • | 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

The underlying biomechanical differences between the pediatric and adult cervical spine are incompletely understood. Computational spine modeling can address that knowledge gap. Using a computational method known as finite element modeling, the authors describe the creation and evaluation of a complete pediatric cervical spine model.

METHODS

Using a thin-slice CT scan of the cervical spine from a 5-year-old boy, a 3D model was created for finite element analysis. The material properties and boundary and loading conditions were created and model analysis performed using open-source software. Because the precise material properties of the pediatric cervical spine are not known, a published parametric approach of scaling adult properties by 50%, 25%, and 10% was used. Each scaled finite element model (FEM) underwent two types of simulations for pediatric cadaver testing (axial tension and cardinal ranges of motion [ROMs]) to assess axial stiffness, ROM, and facet joint force (FJF). The authors evaluated the axial stiffness and flexion-extension ROM predicted by the model using previously published experimental measurements obtained from pediatric cadaveric tissues.

RESULTS

In the axial tension simulation, the model with 50% adult ligamentous and annulus material properties predicted an axial stiffness of 49 N/mm, which corresponded with previously published data from similarly aged cadavers (46.1 ± 9.6 N/mm). In the flexion-extension simulation, the same 50% model predicted an ROM that was within the range of the similarly aged cohort of cadavers. The subaxial FJFs predicted by the model in extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were in the range of 1–4 N and, as expected, tended to increase as the ligament and disc material properties decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

A pediatric cervical spine FEM was created that accurately predicts axial tension and flexion-extension ROM when ligamentous and annulus material properties are reduced to 50% of published adult properties. This model shows promise for use in surgical simulation procedures and as a normal comparison for disease-specific FEMs.

ABBREVIATIONS

CCJ = craniocervical junction; FEM = finite element model; FJF = facet joint force; ROM = range of motion; TL = transverse atlantal ligament; TM = tectorial membrane.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    McCall T, Fassett D, Brockmeyer D. Cervical spine trauma in children: a review. Neurosurg Focus. 2006;20(2):E5.

  • 2

    Greaves LL, Van Toen C, Melnyk A, Koenig L, Zhu Q, Tredwell S, et al. Pediatric and adult three-dimensional cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and sex through overall motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(16):16501657.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Ouyang J, Zhu Q, Zhao W, Xu Y, Chen W, Zhong S. Biomechanical assessment of the pediatric cervical spine under bending and tensile loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2005;30(24):E716E723.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Luck JF, Nightingale RW, Loyd AM, Prange MT, Dibb AT, Song Y, et al. Tensile mechanical properties of the perinatal and pediatric PMHS osteoligamentous cervical spine. Stapp Car Crash J. 2008;52:107134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Luck JF, Nightingale RW, Song Y, Kait JR, Loyd AM, Myers BS, Bass CR. Tensile failure properties of the perinatal, neonatal, and pediatric cadaveric cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(1):E1E12.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Luck JF. The Biomechanics of the Perinatal, Neonatal and Pediatric Cervical Spine: Investigation of the Tensile, Bending and Viscoelastic Response. Dissertation. Biomedical Engineering, Duke University;2012.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Nuckley DJ, Linders DR, Ching RP. Developmental biomechanics of the human cervical spine. J Biomech. 2013;46(6):11471154.

  • 8

    Cobetto N, Aubin CE, Parent S. Surgical planning and follow-up of anterior vertebral body growth modulation in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis using a patient-specific finite element model integrating growth modulation. Spine Deform. 2018;6(4):344350.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Aubin CE, Clin J, Rawlinson J. Biomechanical simulations of costo-vertebral and anterior vertebral body tethers for the fusionless treatment of pediatric scoliosis. J Orthop Res. 2018;36(1):254264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Alvarez VS, Kleiven S. Effect of pediatric growth on cervical spine kinematics and deformations in automotive crashes. J Biomech. 2018;71:7683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Dong L, Li G, Mao H, Marek S, Yang KH. Development and validation of a 10-year-old child ligamentous cervical spine finite element model. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41(12):25382552.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    El-Rich M, Villemure I, Labelle H, Aubin CE. Mechanical loading effects on isthmic spondylolytic lumbar segment: finite element modelling using a personalised geometry. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2009;12(1):1323.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Davidson Jebaseelan D, Jebaraj C, Yoganandan N, Rajasekaran S, Yerramshetty J. Biomechanical responses due to discitis infection of a juvenile thoracolumbar spine using finite element modeling. Med Eng Phys. 2014;36(7):938943.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Phuntsok R, Mazur MD, Ellis BJ, Ravindra VM, Brockmeyer DL. Development and initial evaluation of a finite element model of the pediatric craniocervical junction. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(4):497503.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Astin JH, Wilkerson CG, Dailey AT, Ellis BJ, Brockmeyer DL. Finite element modeling to compare craniocervical motion in two age-matched pediatric patients without or with Down syndrome: implications for the role of bony geometry in craniocervical junction instability. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021;27(2):218224.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Herron MR, Park J, Dailey AT, Brockmeyer DL, Ellis BJ. FEBio finite element models of the human cervical spine. J Biomech. 2020;113:110077.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Finley SM, Brodke DS, Spina NT, DeDen CA, Ellis BJ. FEBio finite element models of the human lumbar spine. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2018;21(6):444452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Mattucci SF, Moulton JA, Chandrashekar N, Cronin DS. Strain rate dependent properties of younger human cervical spine ligaments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012;10:216226.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Maas SA, Ateshian GA, Weiss JA. FEBio: History and advances. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;19:279299.

  • 20

    Maas SA, Ellis BJ, Ateshian GA, Weiss JA. FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics. J Biomech Eng. 2012;134(1):011005.

  • 21

    Ayturk UM, Puttlitz CM. Parametric convergence sensitivity and validation of a finite element model of the human lumbar spine. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2011;14(8):695705.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Ueno K, Liu YK. A three-dimenstional nonlinear finite element model of lumbar intervertebral joint in torsion. J Biomech Eng. 1987;109(3):200209.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Ha SK. Finite element modeling of multi-level cervical spinal segments (C3–C6) and biomechanical analysis of an elastomer-type prosthetic disc. Med Eng Phys. 2006;28(6):534541.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Brolin K, Halldin P. Development of a finite element model of the upper cervical spine and a parameter study of ligament characteristics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(4):376-385.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Phuntsok R, Ellis BJ, Herron MR, Provost CW, Dailey AT, Brockmeyer DL. The occipitoatlantal capsular ligaments are the primary stabilizers of the occipitoatlantal joint in the craniocervical junction: a finite element analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(5):593601.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Leahy PD, Puttlitz CM. The effects of ligamentous injury in the human lower cervical spine. J Biomech. 2012;45(15):26682672.

  • 27

    Zhang QH, Teo EC, Ng HW, Lee VS. Finite element analysis of moment-rotation relationships for human cervical spine. J Biomech. 2006;39(1):189193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Jacobs NT, Cortes DH, Peloquin JM, Vresilovic EJ, Elliott DM. Validation and application of an intervertebral disc finite element model utilizing independently constructed tissue-level constitutive formulations that are nonlinear, anisotropic, and time-dependent. J Biomech. 2014;47(11):25402546.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 252 252 74
Full Text Views 28 28 9
PDF Downloads 35 35 16
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0