Shunt failure clusters: an analysis of multiple, frequent shunt failures

View More View Less
  • Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Repeated failure of ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs) is a problem familiar to pediatric neurosurgeons and patients. While there have been many studies to determine what factors are associated with the first shunt failure, studies of subsequent failures are much less common. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence and associated risk factors of clustered shunt failures (defined as 3 or more VPS operations within 3 months).

METHODS

The authors reviewed prospectively collected records from all patients who underwent VPS surgery from 2008 to 2017 at their institution and included only those children who had received all of their hydrocephalus care at that institution. Demographics, etiology of hydrocephalus, history of endoscopic third ventriculostomy or temporizing procedure, initial valve type, age at shunt placement, and other factors were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to test for the association of each variable with a history of shunt failure cluster.

RESULTS

Of the 465 included children, 28 (6.0%) had experienced at least one cluster of shunt failures. Among time-independent variables, etiology of hydrocephalus (OR 0.27 for non–intraventricular hemorrhage [IVH], nonmyelomeningocele, nonaqueductal stenosis etiology vs IVH, 95% CI 0.11–0.65; p = 0.003), younger gestational age at birth (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85–0.97; p = 0.003), history of a temporizing procedure (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.12–6.85; p = 0.028), and smaller head circumference at time of initial shunt placement (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.99; p = 0.044) showed significant association with shunt failure cluster on univariate analysis. None of these variables maintained significance in a multivariate model. Among children with a history of a shunt failure cluster, 21 (75%) had a shunt infection either prior to or during the shunt failure cluster. A comparison of the infecting organism between these children and 62 children with a history of infection but without a shunt failure cluster showed an association of cluster with gram-negative rod species.

CONCLUSIONS

Six percent of children in this institutional sample had at least one shunt failure cluster. These children accounted for 30% of the total shunt revisions in the sample. Shunt infection is an important factor associated with shunt failure cluster. Children with a history of prematurity and IVH may have a higher risk for failure cluster.

ABBREVIATIONS GNR = gram-negative rod; IVH = intraventricular hemorrhage; VPS = ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Brandon G. Rocque: University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL. brandon.rocque@childrensal.org.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online December 18, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.7.PEDS20199.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

  • 1

    Riva-Cambrin J, Kestle JRW, Holubkov R, Risk factors for shunt malfunction in pediatric hydrocephalus: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(4):382390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Bir SC, Konar S, Maiti TK, Outcome of ventriculoperitoneal shunt and predictors of shunt revision in infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst. 2016;32(8):14051414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Kestle J, Drake J, Milner R, Long-term follow-up data from the Shunt Design Trial. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2000;33(5):230236.

  • 4

    Lazareff JA, Peacock W, Holly L, Multiple shunt failures: an analysis of relevant factors. Childs Nerv Syst. 1998;14(6):271275.

  • 5

    McGirt MJ, Leveque J-C, Wellons JC III, Cerebrospinal fluid shunt survival and etiology of failures: a seven-year institutional experience. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2002;36(5):248255.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Tuli S, Drake J, Lawless J, Risk factors for repeated cerebrospinal shunt failures in pediatric patients with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 2000;92(1):3138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Das MK, Bhattacharyya N, Bhattacharyya AK. WHO child growth standards. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(2):253–255, 257258.

  • 8

    Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Armstrong DC, Dirks PB. Measurement of ventricular size: reliability of the frontal and occipital horn ratio compared to subjective assessment. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999;31(2):6570.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kestle JR, Riva-Cambrin J, Wellons JC III, A standardized protocol to reduce cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network Quality Improvement Initiative. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011;8(1):2229.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Hanak BW, Bonow RH, Harris CA, Browd SR. Cerebrospinal fluid shunting complications in children. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2017;52(6):381400.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Harris CA, McAllister JP II. What we should know about the cellular and tissue response causing catheter obstruction in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(6):15891602.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    van Domburg R, Hoeks S, Kardys I, Tools and techniques—statistics: how many variables are allowed in the logistic and Cox regression models? EuroIntervention. 2014;9(12):14721473.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 138 138 86
Full Text Views 31 31 26
PDF Downloads 16 16 12
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0