Cost comparison of surgical management of nonsagittal synostosis: traditional open versus endoscope-assisted techniques

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

Management of craniosynostosis at an early age is important for mitigating the risk of abnormal cranial development, but treatment can result in significant expenses. Previous research has shown that endoscope-assisted craniectomy (EAC) is less costly than open cranial vault remodeling (CVR) for patients with sagittal synostosis. The aim of this study was to strengthen the existing body of healthcare cost research by elucidating the charges associated with open and endoscopic treatment for patients with nonsagittal synostosis.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of data obtained in 41 patients who underwent open CVR and 38 who underwent EAC with postoperative helmet therapy for nonsagittal, single-suture craniosynostosis (metopic, coronal, and lambdoid) between 2008 and 2018. All patients were < 1 year of age at the time of surgery and had a minimum 1 year of follow-up. Inpatient charges, physician fees, helmet charges, and outpatient clinic visits in the 1st year were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean ages of the children treated with EAC and open CVR were 3.5 months and 8.7 months, respectively. Patients undergoing EAC with postoperative helmet therapy required more outpatient clinic visits in the 1st year than patients undergoing CVR (4 vs 2; p < 0.001). Overall, 13% of patients in the EAC group required 1 helmet, 30% required 2 helmets, 40% required 3 helmets, and 13% required 4 or more helmets; the mean total helmeting charges were $10,072. The total charges of treatment, including inpatient charges, physician fees, outpatient clinic visit costs, and helmet charges, were significantly lower for the EAC group than they were for the open CVR group ($50,840 vs $95,588; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the additional charges for postoperative helmet therapy and the more frequent outpatient visits, EAC is significantly less expensive than open CVR for patients with metopic, coronal, and lambdoid craniosynostosis. In conjunction with the existing literature on clinical outcomes and perioperative resource utilization, these data support EAC as a cost-minimizing treatment for eligible patients with nonsagittal synostosis.

ABBREVIATIONS CPT = Current Procedural Terminology; CVR = cranial vault remodeling; EAC = endoscope-assisted craniectomy; FOA = fronto-orbital advancement; LOS = length of stay.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Kamlesh B. Patel: Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO. kamlesh.patel@wustl.edu.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online January 10, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2019.11.PEDS19515.Disclosures Dr. Patel is a consultant for Stryker CMF and an educational speaker for Hanger Clinic. Dr. Naidoo is an educational speaker for Hanger Clinic.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Abbott MMRogers GFProctor MRBusa KMeara JG: Cost of treating sagittal synostosis in the first year of life. J Craniofac Surg 23:88932012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    American Medical Association: Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) 2019 Professional Edition. Chicago: American Medical Association2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Bennett KGBickham RSRobinson ABBuchman SRVercler CJ: Metopic craniosynostosis: a demographic analysis outside an urban environment. J Craniofac Surg 27:5445472016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Bodenheimer T: High and rising health care costs. Part 1: seeking an explanation. Ann Intern Med 142:8478542005

  • 5

    Bonfield CMBasem JCochrane DDSinghal ASteinbok P: Examining the need for routine intensive care admission after surgical repair of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis: a preliminary analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 22:6166192018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Braun TLEisemann BSOlorunnipa OBuchanan EPMonson LA: Safety outcomes in endoscopic versus open repair of metopic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 29:8568602018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Burns KMEvans FPearson GDBerul CIKaltman JR: Rising charges and costs for pediatric catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 24:1621692013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Chan JWStewart CLStalder MWSt Hilaire HMcBride LMoses MH: Endoscope-assisted versus open repair of craniosynostosis: a comparison of perioperative cost and risk. J Craniofac Surg 24:1701742013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Elliott RMSmartt JM JrTaylor JABartlett SP: Does conventional posterior vault remodeling alter endocranial morphology in patients with true lambdoid synostosis? J Craniofac Surg 24:1151192013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Esparza JHinojosa J: Complications in the surgical treatment of craniosynostosis and craniofacial syndromes: apropos of 306 transcranial procedures. Childs Nerv Syst 24:142114302008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Farber SJNguyen DCSkolnick GBNaidoo SDSmyth MDPatel KB: Anthropometric outcome measures in patients with metopic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 28:7137162017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Fearon JA: Rigid fixation of the calvaria in craniosynostosis without using “rigid” fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:27392003

  • 13

    Goyal ALu VMYolcu YUElminawy MDaniels DJ: Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes. Childs Nerv Syst 34:162716372018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Han RHNguyen DCBruck BSSkolnick GBYarbrough CKNaidoo SD: Characterization of complications associated with open and endoscopic craniosynostosis surgery at a single institution. J Neurosurg Pediatr 17:3613702016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Jen HCRaval MVLangham MR JrCalkins CMDasgupta RShah SR: Attitudes and beliefs of pediatric surgical specialists on costs of care and high deductible health plans. Am Surg 84:141014142018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Jimenez DFBarone CM: Early treatment of coronal synostosis with endoscopy-assisted craniectomy and postoperative cranial orthosis therapy: 16-year experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr 12:2072192013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Jimenez DFBarone CM: Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 88:77811998

  • 18

    Jimenez DFBarone CMCartwright CCBaker L: Early management of craniosynostosis using endoscopic-assisted strip craniectomies and cranial orthotic molding therapy. Pediatrics 110:971042002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Jivraj BAAhmed NKaria KMenon RRobertson ESodha A: A 24-month cost and outcome analysis comparing traditional fronto-orbital advancment and remodeling with endoscopic strip craniectomy and molding helmet in the management of unicoronal craniosynostosis: a retrospective bi-institutional review. JPRAS Open 20:35422019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Koh KLZain A: Surgical outcome after less “rigid” fixation in open cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 29:8618672018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Lee HQHutson JMWray ACLo PAChong DKHolmes AD: Analysis of morbidity and mortality in surgical management of craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 23:125612612012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Lee HQHutson JMWray ACLo PAChong DKHolmes AD: Changing epidemiology of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis and revisiting the risk factors. J Craniofac Surg 23:124512512012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Liles CDallas JHale ATGannon SVance EHBonfield CM: The economic impact of open versus endoscope-assisted craniosynostosis surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr 24:1052152019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Masserano BWoo ASSkolnick GBNaidoo SDProctor MRSmyth MD: The temporal region in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis: fronto-orbital advancement versus endoscopy-assisted strip craniectomy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 55:4234292018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Meara JGBurvin RBartlett RAMulliken JB: Anthropometric study of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly: before and after fronto-orbital advancement with correction of nasal angulation. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:7317382003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Natghian HSong MJayamohan JJohnson DMagdum SRichards P: Long-term results in isolated metopic synostosis: the Oxford experience over 22 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:509e515e2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    National Health Policy Forum: Relative value units (RVUs): the basics. (https://www.nhpf.org/library/the-basics/Basics_RVUs_01-12-15.pdf) [Accessed November 18 2019]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Nguyen DCFarber SJSkolnick GBNaidoo SDSmyth MDKane AA: One hundred consecutive endoscopic repairs of sagittal craniosynostosis: an evolution in care. J Neurosurg Pediatr 20:4104182017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Nguyen DCPatel KBSkolnick GBNaidoo SDHuang AHSmyth MD: Are endoscopic and open treatments of metopic synostosis equivalent in treating trigonocephaly and hypotelorism? J Craniofac Surg 26:1291342015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Patel KBSkolnick GBMulliken JB: Anthropometric outcomes following fronto-orbital advancement for metopic synostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:153915472016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Ridgway EBBerry-Candelario JGrondin RTRogers GFProctor MR: The management of sagittal synostosis using endoscopic suturectomy and postoperative helmet therapy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:6206262011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Rottgers SALohani SProctor MR: Outcomes of endoscopic suturectomy with postoperative helmet therapy in bilateral coronal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 18:2812862016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Selber JReid RRChike-Obi CJSutton LNZackai EHMcDonald-McGinn D: The changing epidemiologic spectrum of single-suture synostoses. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:5275332008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Smartt JM JrReid RRSingh DJBartlett SP: True lambdoid craniosynostosis: long-term results of surgical and conservative therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:99310032007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Tan SPProctor MRMulliken JBRogers GF: Early frontofacial symmetry after correction of unilateral coronal synostosis: frontoorbital advancement vs endoscopic strip craniectomy and helmet therapy. J Craniofac Surg 24:119011942013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Thurston TEAndrades PPhillips RARay PDGrant JH III: Safety profile of wire osteosynthesis in craniosynostosis surgery. J Craniofac Surg 20:115411582009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    van der Meulen J: Metopic synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 28:135913672012

  • 38

    van der Meulen Jvan der Hulst Rvan Adrichem LArnaud EChin-Shong DDuncan C: The increase of metopic synostosis: a pan-European observation. J Craniofac Surg 20:2832862009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Vogel TWWoo ASKane AAPatel KBNaidoo SDSmyth MD: A comparison of costs associated with endoscope-assisted craniectomy versus open cranial vault repair for infants with sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 13:3243312014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Williams CTSegar DJNaidoo SDSkolnick GBProctor MRSmyth MD: Evaluation of endoscopic strip craniectomy and orthotic therapy for bilateral coronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 30:4534572019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Wolfswinkel EMHowell LKFahradyan AAzadgoli BMcComb JGUrata MM: Is postoperative intensive care unit care necessary following cranial vault remodeling for sagittal synostosis? Plast Reconstr Surg 140:123512392017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Zubovic EWoo ASSkolnick GBNaidoo SDSmyth MDPatel KB: Cranial base and posterior cranial vault asymmetry after open and endoscopic repair of isolated lambdoid craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 26:156815732015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 241 241 60
Full Text Views 43 43 23
PDF Downloads 31 31 15
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar