Preoperative third ventricular bowing as a predictor of endoscopic third ventriculostomy success

Clinical article

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, and
  • 2 College of Public Health, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

Patients with hydrocephalus often present with both intraventricular obstructive and communicating components, and determination of the predominant component is difficult. Other investigators have observed that third ventricular floor deformation, or “bowing” of the third ventricular floor, is a good indicator of intraventricular obstructive hydrocephalus, resulting in higher success rates with endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV). However, additional third ventricular bowing assessment and statistical evidence demonstrating a difference in ETV outcome with third ventricular bowing is needed. The authors hypothesized that patients with preoperative bowing of the third ventricle would exhibit greater long-term success rates after ETV and that lack of bowing would result in increased failure rates after ETV.

Methods

The authors determined success and failure for 59 ETVs performed in 56 patients, and recorded patient age, time to failure, and preoperative third ventricular anatomy, as well as history of infection, intraventricular hemorrhage, and previous shunt. Third ventricular anatomy was assessed on MR imaging for bowing, which was classified as any of the following: depression of the third ventricular floor, enlargement of the supraoptic recess, anterior curvature of the lamina terminalis, dilation of the proximal aqueduct to a greater extent than the distal aqueduct, and blunting or posterior bowing of the suprapineal recess. Univariate and multivariate analyses of ETV failure and the time to failure were performed using logistic regression and the Cox proportional hazards model, respectively.

Results

After adjusting for patient age and history of infection, there was a significant association between lack of anterior third ventricular preoperative bowing (either lamina terminalis, supraoptic recess, or third ventricular floor) and ETV failure (adjusted HR 2.79, 95% CI 1.08–7.20). Of the patients with bowing, 70.5% experienced success with ETV, as did 33.3% of the patients without bowing. Among the individual structures, absence of bowing in the anterior aspect of the third ventricular floor was significantly associated with censored time to ETV failure (multivariate HR 2.59, 95% CI 1.01–6.66; final model including age and history of infection).

Conclusions

The presence of preoperative third ventricular bowing is predictive of ETV success, with nearly a 3-fold likelihood of success compared with patients treated with ETV in the absence of such bowing. Although bowing is predictive, 33% of patients without bowing were also treated successfully with ETV.

Abbreviations used in this paper:ETV = endoscopic third ventriculostomy; IVH = intraventricular hemorrhage; NPV = negative predictive value; PPV = positive predictive value.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Jeremy D. W. Greenlee, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, Iowa 52242. email: jeremygreenlee@uiowa.edu.

Please include this information when citing this paper: DOI: 10.3171/2011.11.PEDS11495.

  • 1

    Abbott R: History of neuroendoscopy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 15:17, 2004

  • 2

    Apuzzo ML, , Heifetz MD, , Weiss MH, & Kurze T: Neurosurgical endoscopy using the side-viewing telescope. J Neurosurg 46:398400, 1977

  • 3

    Bargalló N, , Olondo L, , Garcia AI, , Capurro S, , Caral L, & Rumia J: Functional analysis of third ventriculostomy patency by quantification of CSF stroke volume by using cine phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:25142521, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Chugh A, , Husain M, , Gupta RK, , Ojha BK, , Chandra A, & Rastogi M: Surgical outcome of tuberculous meningitis hydrocephalus treated by endoscopic third ventriculostomy: prognostic factors and postoperative neuroimaging for functional assessment of ventriculostomy. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:371377, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Drake JM: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in pediatric patients: the Canadian experience. Neurosurgery 60:881886, 2007

  • 6

    Drake JM: Ventriculostomy for treatment of hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Clin N Am 4:657666, 1993

  • 7

    Drake JM, & Riva-Cambrin J: Editorial. Can intraoperative assessment of endoscopic third ventriculostomy predict success?. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:295297, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Foroughi M, , Wong A, , Steinbok P, , Singhal A, , Sargent MA, & Cochrane DD: Third ventricular shape: a predictor of endoscopic third ventriculostomy success in pediatric patients. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:389396, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Fukuhara T, , Shimizu T, & Namba Y: Limited efficacy of endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 49:449455, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Gangemi M, , Maiuri F, , Naddeo M, , Godano U, , Mascari C, & Broggi G, : Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: an Italian multicenter study. Neurosurgery 63:6269, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Greenfield JP, , Hoffman C, , Kuo E, , Christos PJ, & Souweidane MM: Intraoperative assessment of endoscopic third ventriculostomy success. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:298303, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Hailong F, , Guangfu H, , Haibin T, , Hong P, , Yong C, & Weidong L, : Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of communicating hydrocephalus: a preliminary study. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 109:923930, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Hodel J, , Decq P, , Rahmouni A, , Bastuji-Garin S, , Maraval A, & Combes C, : Brain ventricular wall movement assessed by a gated cine MR trueFISP sequence in patients treated with endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Eur Radiol 19:27892797, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Husain M, , Jha DK, , Rastogi M, , Husain N, & Gupta RK: Role of neuroendoscopy in the management of patients with tuberculous meningitis hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Rev 28:278283, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Jenkinson MD, , Hayhurst C, , Al-Jumaily M, , Kandasamy J, , Clark S, & Mallucci CL: The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in adult patients with hydrocephalus. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 110:861866, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Jonathan A, & Rajshekhar V: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for chronic hydrocephalus after tuberculous meningitis. Surg Neurol 63:3235, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Kanner A, , Hopf NJ, & Grunert P: The “optimal” burr hole position for endoscopic third ventriculostomy: results from 31 stereotactically guided procedures. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 43:187189, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Kehler U, , Regelsberger J, , Gliemroth J, & Westphal M: Outcome prediction of third ventriculostomy: a proposed hydrocephalus grading system. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49:238243, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Knaus H, , Abbushi A, , Hoffmann KT, , Schwarz K, , Haberl H, & Thomale UW: Measurements of burr-hole localization for endoscopic procedures in the third ventricle in children. Childs Nerv Syst 25:293299, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Kombogiorgas D, & Sgouros S: Assessment of the influence of operative factors in the success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children. Childs Nerv Syst 22:12561262, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Kulkarni AV, , Drake JM, , Kestle JR, , Mallucci CL, , Sgouros S, & Constantini S: Predicting who will benefit from endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared with shunt insertion in childhood hydrocephalus using the ETV Success Score. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:310315, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Kulkarni AV, , Drake JM, , Mallucci CL, , Sgouros S, , Roth J, & Constantini S: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. J Pediatr 155:254259, e1, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Kulkarni AV, , Riva-Cambrin J, & Browd SR: Use of the ETV Success Score to explain the variation in reported endoscopic third ventriculostomy success rates among published case series of childhood hydrocephalus. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:143146, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Lev S, , Bhadelia RA, , Estin D, , Heilman CB, & Wolpert SM: Functional analysis of third ventriculostomy patency with phase-contrast MRI velocity measurements. Neuroradiology 39:175179, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Li KW, , Nelson C, , Suk I, & Jallo GI: Neuroendoscopy: past, present, and future. Neurosurg Focus 19:6 E1, 2005

  • 26

    Lipina R, , Palecek T, , Reguli S, & Kovarova M: Death in consequence of late failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst 23:815819, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Liu CY, , Wang MY, & Apuzzo ML: The physics of image formation in the neuroendoscope. Childs Nerv Syst 20:777782, 2004

  • 28

    Longatti P, , Fiorindi A, , Martinuzzi A, & Feletti A: Primary obstruction of the fourth ventricle outlets: neuroendoscopic approach and anatomic description. Neurosurgery 65:10781086, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Meier U, , Zeilinger FS, & Schönherr B: Endoscopic ventriculostomy versus shunt operation in normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostics and indication. Acta Neurochir Suppl 76:563566, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Mohanty A, , Biswas A, , Satish S, & Vollmer DG: Efficacy of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in fourth ventricular outlet obstruction. Neurosurgery 63:905914, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Morota N, , Watabe T, , Inukai T, , Hongo K, & Nakagawa H: Anatomical variants in the floor of the third ventricle; implications for endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 69:531534, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    O'Brien DF, , Seghedoni A, , Collins DR, , Hayhurst C, & Mallucci CL: Is there an indication for ETV in young infants in aetiologies other than isolated aqueduct stenosis?. Childs Nerv Syst 22:15651572, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Oertel JM, , Mondorf Y, , Baldauf J, , Schroeder HW, & Gaab MR: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus due to intracranial hemorrhage with intraventricular extension. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 111:11191126, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Ransohoff J, , Shulman K, & Fishman RA: Hydrocephalus: a review of etiology and treatment. J Pediatr 56:399411, 1960

  • 35

    Rekate HL: Shunt-related headaches: the slit ventricle syndromes. Childs Nerv Syst 24:423430, 2008

  • 36

    Rekate HL, , Nadkarni TD, & Wallace D: The importance of the cortical subarachnoid space in understanding hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:111, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Rhoton AL Jr: The lateral and third ventricles. Neurosurgery 51:4 Suppl S207S271, 2002

  • 38

    Sacko O, , Boetto S, , Lauwers-Cances V, , Dupuy M, & Roux FE: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: outcome analysis in 368 procedures. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:6874, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Siomin V, & Constantini S: Basic principles and equipment in neuroendoscopy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 15:1931, 2004

  • 40

    Wagner W, & Koch D: Mechanisms of failure after endoscopic third ventriculostomy in young infants. J Neurosurg 103:1 Suppl 4349, 2005

  • 41

    Walker ML: History of ventriculostomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am 12:101110, viii, 2001

  • 42

    Warf BC, & Kulkarni AV: Intraoperative assessment of cerebral aqueduct patency and cisternal scarring: impact on success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in 403 African children. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:204209, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Yadav YR, , Mukerji G, , Parihar V, , Sinha M, & Pandey S: Complex hydrocephalus (combination of communicating and obstructive type): an important cause of failed endoscopic third ventriculostomy. BMC Res Notes 2:137, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 506 296 11
Full Text Views 113 34 4
PDF Downloads 125 18 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0