Use of a minimally invasive tubular retraction system for deep-seated tumors in pediatric patients

Technical note

View More View Less
  • 1 Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
  • 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

Microsurgical removal is the preferred treatment for most deep-seated, intraaxial tumors in the pediatric population. The feasibility of surgery as an option has improved with advances in surgical technology and technique. Tubular retractors disperse retraction forces over a greater surface area than do conventional retractors, which can lower the risk of ischemic complications. The authors describe their experience utilizing a new tubular retractor system specifically designed for cranial applications in conjunction with frameless neuronavigation.

Methods

The Vycor ViewSite retractor was used in 4 pediatric patients (ages 15 months and 9, 10, and 16 years) with deep-seated intraaxial tumors. The lesions included a papillary tumor of the pineal region, a low-grade astrocytoma in the occipital lobe, a dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor arising from the basal ganglia, and an intraventricular low-grade glioma. The extent of white matter damage along the surgical trajectory (based on T2 or FLAIR and diffusion restriction/apparent diffusion coefficient signals) and the extent of resection were assessed on postoperative imaging.

Results

Satisfactory resection or biopsy was achieved in all patients. A comparison of pre- and postoperative MR imaging studies revealed evidence of white matter damage along the surgical trajectory in 1 patient. None of the patients demonstrated new neurological deficits postoperatively.

Conclusions

Obtaining surgical access to deep-seated, intraaxial tumors is challenging. In this small series of pediatric patients, the combination of the ViewSite tubular retractor and frameless neuronavigation facilitated the surgical approach. The combination of these technologies adds to the armamentarium to safely approach tumors in deep locations.

Abbreviations used in this paper: DNET = dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor; DT = diffusion tensor; DW = diffusion-weighted; fMR = functional MR.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Violette Renard Recinos, M.D., Pediatric Neurosurgical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, S-60, Cleveland, Ohio 44195. email: recinov@ccf.org.
  • 1

    Albin MS, & Bunegin L: The insidiousness of brain retractor pressure: another “smoking gun”?. Anesth Analg 96:306307, 2003. (Letter)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Andrews RJ, & Bringas JR: A review of brain retraction and recommendations for minimizing intraoperative brain injury. Neurosurgery 33:10521064, 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Barlas O, & Karadereler S: Stereotactically guided microsurgical removal of colloid cysts. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146:11991204, 2004

  • 4

    Cabbell KL, & Ross DA: Stereotactic microsurgical craniotomy for the treatment of third ventricular colloid cysts. Neurosurgery 38:301307, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Fahim DK, , Relyea K, , Nayar VV, , Fox BD, , Whitehead WE, & Curry DJ, : Transtubular microendoscopic approach for resection of a choroidal arteriovenous malformation. Technical note. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:101104, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Greenberg IM: Self-retaining retractor and handrest system for neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 8:205208, 1981

  • 7

    Greenfield JP, , Cobb WS, , Tsouris AJ, & Schwartz TH: Stereotactic minimally invasive tubular retractor system for deep brain lesions. Neurosurgery 63:4 Suppl 2 334340, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Herrera SR, , Shin JH, , Chan M, , Kouloumberis P, , Goellner E, & Slavin KV: Use of transparent plastic tubular retractor in surgery for deep brain lesions: a case series. Surg Technol Int 19:4750, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kelly PJ: Future perspectives in stereotactic neurosurgery: stereotactic microsurgical removal of deep brain tumors. J Neurosurg Sci 33:149154, 1989

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kelly PJ, , Goerss SJ, & Kall BA: The stereotaxic retractor in computer-assisted stereotaxic microsurgery. Technical note. J Neurosurg 69:301306, 1988

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Kelly PJ, , Kall BA, & Goerss SJ: Computer-interactive stereotactic resection of deep-seated and centrally located intraaxial brain lesions. Appl Neurophysiol 50:107113, 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Laundre BJ, , Jellison BJ, , Badie B, , Alexander AL, & Field AS: Diffusion tensor imaging of the corticospinal tract before and after mass resection as correlated with clinical motor find ings: preliminary data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:791796, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Moshel YA, , Link MJ, & Kelly PJ: Stereotactic volumetric resection of thalamic pilocytic astrocytomas. Neurosurgery 61:6675, 2007

  • 14

    Ogura K, , Tachibana E, , Aoshima C, & Sumitomo M: New microsurgical technique for intraparenchymal lesions of the brain: transcylinder approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:779785, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Otsuki T, , Jokura H, & Yoshimoto T: Stereotactic guiding tube for open-system endoscopy: a new approach for the stereotactic endoscopic resection of intra-axial brain tumors. Neurosurgery 27:326330, 1990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Rosenørn J, & Diemer NH: The influence of intermittent versus continuous brain retractor pressure on regional cerebral blood flow and neuropathology in the rat. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 93:1317, 1988

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Rosenørn J, & Diemer NH: Reduction of regional cerebral blood flow during brain retraction pressure in the rat. J Neurosurg 56:826829, 1982

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Rosenørn J, & Diemer NH: The risk of cerebral damage during graded brain retractor pressure in the rat. J Neurosurg 63:608611, 1985

  • 19

    Ross DA: A simple stereotactic retractor for use with the Leksell stereotactic system. Neurosurgery 32:475476, 1993

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 685 283 11
Full Text Views 169 24 0
PDF Downloads 189 26 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0