Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients younger than 2 years: outcome analysis of 41 hydrocephalus cases

Clinical article

Albert A. Sufianov M.D., Ph.D., Galina Z. Sufianova M.D., Ph.D., and Iurii A. Iakimov M.D.
View More View Less
  • Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, East Siberian Minimally Invasive Neurosurgical Centre, Irkutsk, Russia
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

The object of this study was to analyze the outcome of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in patients under 2 years of age and investigate factors related to ETV success or failure in this patient population.

Methods

The authors reviewed their experience in using endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) in the treatment of 41 hydrocephalus patients younger than 2 years. The mean duration of follow-up was 45 months. The relationship between ETV efficacy and the following variables was analyzed: cause of hydrocephalus, level of CSF occlusion, primary versus secondary ETV, type of surgical procedure, head circumference, patient age at ETV, patient age at first manifestation of hydrocephalus, and anatomical features of the ventricle. Success of ETV was assessed based on the results of neurological examination and postoperative imaging during the follow-up period.

Results

The authors performed 32 primary ETVs and 10 secondary ETVs (ETV after hydrocephalus surgery) in 41 patients (a second ETV was performed in 1 patient). The success rates of primary and secondary ETV were 75.8 and 55.6%, respectively (no significant difference, p = 0.15). The ETV was clinically and radiologically successful in 30 (71.4%) of 42 procedures during a mean (± SD) follow-up period of 45.0 ± 4.8 months (range 12–127 months). A negative relationship was found between success of ETV and the thickness of the floor of the third ventricle (the most effective procedures were those in which the floor of the ventricle was thinnest [p < 0.05]). There was a highly significant correlation between ETV success and prolapse of the ventricle floor (p < 0.001). Also, there was an inverse relationship between ventricle floor thickness and the width of the third ventricle (p < 0.005). In our group of patients there was significant correlation between ETV success and patient age at onset of hydrocephalus (the most effective procedures were in patients in whom signs of hydrocephalus first occurred after 1 month of age [p = 0.02]).

Conclusions

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy was successful in 71.4% of procedures in children younger than 2 years and in 75.0% of procedures in infants. Success of ETV in children younger than 2 years depends not on the age of the patient or cause of hydrocephalus but on the thickness of the floor of the third ventricle and the patient's age at first manifestation of hydrocephalus.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

CISS = constructive interference in steady state; ETV = endoscopic third ventriculostomy.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Aquilina K, , Edwards RJ, & Pople IK: Routine placement of a ventricular reservoir at endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 53:9197, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Baldauf J, , Oertel J, , Gaab MR, & Schroeder HW: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 2 years of age. Childs Nerv Syst 23:623626, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Balthasar AJ, , Kort H, , Cornips EM, , Beuls EA, , Weber JW, & Vles JS: Analysis of the success and failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants less than 1 year of age. Childs Nerv Syst 23:151155, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Buxton N, , Macarthur D, , Mallucci C, , Punt J, & Vloeberghs M: Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients less than 1 year old. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:7376, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Cinalli G: Alternatives to shunting. Childs Nerv Syst 15:718731, 1999

  • 6

    Cinalli G, , Salazar C, , Mallucci C, , Yada JZ, , Zerah M, & Sainte-Rose C: The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of shunt malfunction. Neurosurgery 43:13231329, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Di Rocco C, , Marchese E, & Velardi F: A survey of the first complication of newly implanted CSF shunt devices for the treatment of nontumoral hydrocephalus. Cooperative survey of the 1991–1992 Education Committee of the ISPN. Childs Nerv Syst 10:321327, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Drake JM: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in pediatric patients: the Canadian experience. Neurosurgery 60:881886, 2007

  • 9

    Drake JM: The surgical management of pediatric hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 62:2 Suppl 633642, 2008

  • 10

    Drake JM, , Kestle JR, & Tuli S: CSF shunts 50 years on—past, present and future. Childs Nerv Syst 16:800804, 2000

  • 11

    Enchev Y, & Oi S: Historical trends of neuroendoscopic surgical techniques in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Rev 31:249262, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Etus V, & Ceylan S: Success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children less than 2 years of age. Neurosurg Rev 28:284288, 2005

  • 13

    Fritsch MJ, , Kienke S, , Ankermann T, , Padoin M, & Mehdorn HM: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants. J Neurosurg 103:1 Suppl 5053, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Griffith HB: Technique of fontanelle and persutural ventriculoscopy and endoscopic ventricular surgery in infants. Childs Brain 1:359363, 1975

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Güzelbağ E, , Erşahin Y, & Mutluer S: Cerebrospinal fluid shunt complications. Turk J Pediatr 39:363371, 1997

  • 16

    Hader WJ, , Drake J, , Cochrane D, , Sparrow O, , Johnson ES, & Kestle J: Death after late failure of third ventriculostomy in children. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 97:211215, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Handler MH, , Abbott R, & Lee M: A near-fatal complication of endoscopic third ventriculostomy: case report. Neurosurgery 35:525528, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Hopf NJ, , Grunert P, , Fries G, , Resch KD, & Perneczky A: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures. Neurosurgery 44:795806, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Hoppe-Hirsch E, , Laroussinie F, , Brunet L, , Sainte-Rose C, , Renier D, & Cinalli G, et al.: Late outcome of the surgical treatment of hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 14:9799, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Javadpour M, , Mallucci C, , Brodbelt A, , Golash A, & May P: The impact of endoscopic third ventriculostomy on the management of newly diagnosed hydrocephalus in infants. Pediatr Neurosurg 35:131135, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Jones RF, , Kwok BC, , Stening WA, & Vonau M: Neuroendoscopic third ventriculostomy. A practical alternative to extracranial shunts in non-communicating hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 61:7983, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Jones RF, , Kwok BC, , Stening WA, & Vonau M: Third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus associated with spinal dysraphism: indications and contraindications. Eur J Pediatr Surg 6:1 Suppl 1 56, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Kadrian D, , van Gelder J, , Florida D, , Jones R, , Vonau M, & Teo C, et al.: Long-term reliability of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 62:2 Suppl 614621, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Kamel MH, , Kelleher M, , Aquilina K, , Lim C, , Caird J, & Kaar G: Use of a simple intraoperative hydrostatic pressure test to assess the relationship between mobility of the ventricular stoma and success of third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 103:848852, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Kestle J, , Drake J, , Milner R, , Sainte-Rose C, , Cinalli G, & Boop F, et al.: Long-term follow-up data from the Shunt Design Trial. Pediatr Neurosurg 33:230236, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Keucher TR, & Mealey J Jr: Long-term results after ventriculoatrial and ventriculoperitoneal shunting for infantile hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 50:179186, 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Koch D, & Wagner W: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants of less than 1 year of age: which factors influence the outcome?. Childs Nerv Syst 20:405411, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Koch-Wiewrodt D, & Wagner W: Success and failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in young infants: are there different age distributions?. Childs Nerv Syst 22:15371541, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Kombogiorgas D, & Sgouros S: Assessment of the influence of operative factors in the success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children. Childs Nerv Syst 22:12561262, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Lipina R, , Reguli S, , Dolezilová V, , Kuncíková M, & Podesvová H: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus in children younger than 6 months of age: is it a firstchoice method?. Childs Nerv Syst 24:10211027, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Mixter WJ: Ventriculoscopy and puncture of the floor of third ventricle. Preliminary report of a case. Boston Med Surg J 188:277278, 1923

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Mohanty A, , Vasudev MK, , Sampath S, , Radhesh S, & Sastry Kolluri VR: Failed endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children: management options. Pediatr Neurosurg 37:304309, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    O'Brien DF, , Seghedoni A, , Collins DR, , Hayhurst C, & Mallucci CL: Is there an indication for ETV in young infants in aetiologies other than isolated aqueduct stenosis?. Childs Nerv Syst 22:15651572, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Punt J, Third ventriculostomy in shunt malfunction. Cinalli G, , Maixner WJ, & Sainte-Rose C: Pediatric Hydrocephalus Milan, Springer-Verlag Italia, 2004. 389397

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Punt J, & Vloeberghs M: Endoscopy in neurosurgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 7:159170, 1998

  • 36

    Sainte-Rose C, Third ventriculostomy. Manwaring KH, & Crone KR: Neuroendoscopy New York, Mary Ann Liebert, 1992. Vol 1:4762

  • 37

    Sainte-Rose C, , Piatt JH, , Renier D, , Pierre-Kahn A, , Hirsch JF, & Hoffman HJ, et al.: Mechanical complications in shunts. Pediatr Neurosurg 17:29, 1991–1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Schroeder HW, , Niendorf WR, & Gaab MR: Complications of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 96:10321040, 2002

  • 39

    Shim KW, , Kim DS, & Choi JU: Simultaneous endoscopic third ventriculostomy and ventriculoperitoneal shunt for infantile hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 24:443451, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Siomin V, , Cinalli G, , Grotenhuis A, , Golash A, , Oi S, & Kothbauer K, et al.: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with cerebrospinal fluid infection and/or hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 97:519524, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Stan H, , Popa C, , Iosif A, & Nistor S: Combined endoscopically guided third ventriculostomy with prepontine cistern placement of the ventricular catheter in a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt: technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 50:247250, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Sufianov A, , Sufianova G, & Iakimov Iu: Neuroendoscopic procedures in achievement of shunt independence: outcome analysis of 28 patients with shunt malfunction. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51:158164, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Sufianov AA, , Komarevskii AV, , Belik AA, , Noskov AP, , Chimytova EA, & Seliverstov PV: [Shunting operations in the hypertensive hydrocephalic syndrome in children with developmental defects of the central nervous system.]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko 1:711, 1999. (Russian)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Sufianov AA, , Sufianova GZ, & Iakimov IA: Microsurgical study of the interpeduncular cistern and its communication with adjoining cisterns. Childs Nerv Syst 25:301308, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Teo C, Third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus: experience with more than 120 cases. Hellwig D, & Bauer BL: Minimally Invasive Techniques for Neurosurgery Berlin, Springer, 1998. 7376

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46

    Wagner W, & Koch D: Mechanisms of failure after endoscopic third ventriculostomy in young infants. J Neurosurg 103:1 Suppl 4349, 2005

  • 47

    Warf BC: Comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy alone and combined with choroid plexus cauterization in infants younger than 1 year of age: a prospective study in 550 African children. J Neurosurg 103:6 Suppl 475481, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48

    Warf BC: Hydrocephalus in Uganda: the predominance of infectious origin and primary management with endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 102:1 Suppl 115, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 602 177 10
Full Text Views 140 7 0
PDF Downloads 141 5 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0