Resection and disconnection surgeries for epilepsy in the pediatric demographic (patients ≤ 18 years of age) are two separate, definitive intervention options in medically refractory cases. Questions remain regarding the role of surgery when seizures persist after an initial incomplete surgery. The aim of this study was to review the contemporary literature and summarize the metadata on the outcomes of repeat surgery in this specific demographic.
Searches of seven electronic databases from inception to July 2022 were conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened using prespecified criteria. Metadata from the articles were abstracted and pooled by random-effects meta-analysis of proportions.
Eleven studies describing 12 cohorts satisfied all criteria, reporting outcomes of 170 pediatric patients with epilepsy who underwent repeat resection or disconnection surgery. Of these patients, 55% were male, and across all studies, median ages at initial and repeat surgeries were 7.2 and 9.4 years, respectively. The median follow-up duration after repeat surgery was 47.7 months. The most commonly reported etiology for epilepsy was cortical dysplasia. Overall, the estimated incidence of complete seizure freedom (Engel class I) following repeat surgery was 48% (95% CI 40%–56%, p value for heterogeneity = 0.93), and the estimated incidence of postoperative complications following repeat surgery was 25% (95% CI 12%–39%, p = 0.04). There were six cohorts each that described outcomes for repeat resection and repeat disconnection surgeries. There was no statistical difference between these two subgroups with respect to estimated incidence of complete seizure freedom (p value for interaction = 0.92), but postoperative complications were statistically more common following repeat resection (p ≤ 0.01).
For both resection and disconnection surgeries, repeat epilepsy surgery in children is likely to confer complete seizure freedom in approximately half of the patients who experience unsuccessful initial incomplete epilepsy surgery. More data are needed to elucidate the impact on efficacy based on surgical approach selection. Judicious discussion and planning between the patient, family, and a multidisciplinary team of epilepsy specialists is recommended to optimize expectations and outcomes in this setting.
GRADE = grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations; NOS = Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; PICOS = population, intervention/interest, comparison, outcomes, study type; PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
FukudaM, MasudaH, ShirozuH, Additional resective surgery after the failure of initial surgery in patients with intractable epilepsy. Neurol Res. 2017;39(12):1049–1055.2888979110.1080/01616412.2017.1376471)| false
IwasakiM, IijimaK, TakayamaY, et al.Predictors of seizure outcome after repeat pediatric epilepsy surgery: reasons for failure, sex, electrophysiology, and temporal lobe surgery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2022;62(3):125–132.
KiehnaEN, WidjajaE, HolowkaS, et al.Utility of diffusion tensor imaging studies linked to neuronavigation and other modalities in repeat hemispherotomy for intractable epilepsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(4):483–490.
KiehnaEN, WidjajaE, HolowkaS, Utility of diffusion tensor imaging studies linked to neuronavigation and other modalities in repeat hemispherotomy for intractable epilepsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(4):483–490.2665115910.3171/2015.7.PEDS15101)| false
Volpon SantosM, TeixeiraTL, IoriattiES, ThomeU, Paula de Andrade HamadA, MachadoHR. Risk factors and results of hemispherotomy reoperations in children. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;48(4):E5.3223497910.3171/2020.1.FOCUS19944)| false
GroteA, WittJA, SurgesR, et al.A second chance—reoperation in patients with failed surgery for intractable epilepsy: long-term outcome, neuropsychology and complications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(4):379–385.
GroteA, WittJA, SurgesR, A second chance—reoperation in patients with failed surgery for intractable epilepsy: long-term outcome, neuropsychology and complications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87(4):379–385.2585539910.1136/jnnp-2015-310322)| false
JungJM, LeeJY, PhiJH, Value of routine immediate postoperative brain computerized tomography in pediatric neurosurgical patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28(5):673–679.2237069110.1007/s00381-012-1716-x)| false
SacinoMF, HoCY, WhiteheadMT, et al.Resective surgery for focal cortical dysplasia in children: a comparative analysis of the utility of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI). Childs Nerv Syst. 2016;32(6):1101–1107.
SacinoMF, HoCY, WhiteheadMT, Resective surgery for focal cortical dysplasia in children: a comparative analysis of the utility of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI). Childs Nerv Syst. 2016;32(6):1101–1107.2704815010.1007/s00381-016-3070-x)| false
LuVM, GraffeoCS, PerryA, Pearls for interpreting neurosurgical systematic reviews and meta-analyses: lessons from a collaborative effort. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(3):435–441.3214072010.1093/neuros/nyaa027)| false
BeniflaM, OtsuboH, OchiA, Temporal lobe surgery for intractable epilepsy in children: an analysis of outcomes in 126 children. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(6):1203–1214.1727768310.1227/01.NEU.0000245615.32226.83)| false