Screw fixation of the upper cervical spine in the pediatric population

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Rigid fixation of the upper cervical spine has become an established method of durable stabilization for a variety of craniocervical pathological entities in children. In children, specifically, the use of C1–2 transarticular screws has been proposed in recent literature to be the gold standard configuration for pathology involving these levels. The authors reviewed the use of rigid fixation techniques alternative to C1–2 transarticular screws in children. Factors evaluated included ease of placement, complications, and postoperative stability.

Methods

Seventeen patients, ranging in age from 3 to 17 years (mean 9.6 years), underwent screw fixation involving the atlas or axis for a multitude of pathologies, including os odontoideum, Down syndrome, congenital instability, iatrogenic instability, or posttraumatic instability. All patients had preoperative instability of the occipitocervical or atlantoaxial spine demonstrated on dynamic lateral cervical spine radiographs. All patients also underwent preoperative CT scanning and MR imaging to evaluate the anatomical feasibility of the selected hardware placement. Thirteen patients underwent C1–2 fusion, and 4 underwent occipitocervical fusion, all incorporating C-1 lateral mass screws, C-2 pars screws, and/or C-2 laminar screws within their constructs. Patients who underwent occipitocervical fusion had no instrumentation placed at C-1. One patient's construct included sublaminar wiring at C-2. All patients received autograft onlay either from from rib (in 15 patients), split-thickness skull (1 patient), or local bone harvested within the operative field (1 patient). Nine patients' constructs were supplemented with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein at the discretion of the attending physician. Eight patients had surgical sacrifice of 1 or both C-2 nerve roots to better facilitate visualization of the C-1 lateral mass. One patient was placed in halo-vest orthosis postoperatively, while the rest were maintained in rigid collars.

Results

All 17 patients underwent immediate postoperative CT scanning to evaluate hardware placement. Follow-up was achieved in 16 cases, ranging from 2 to 39 months (mean 14 months), and repeated dynamic lateral cervical spine radiography was performed in these patients at the end of their follow-up period. Some, but not all patients, also underwent delayed postoperative CT scans, which were done at the discretion of the treating attending physician. No neurovascular injuries were encountered, no hardware revisions were required, and no infections were seen. No postoperative pain was seen in patients who underwent C-2 nerve root sacrifice. Stability was achieved in all patients postoperatively. In all patients who underwent delayed postoperative CT scanning, the presence of bridging bone was shown spanning the fused levels.

Conclusions

Screw fixation of the atlas using lateral mass screws, in conjunction with C-2 root sacrifice in selected cases, and of the axis using pars or laminar screws is a safe method for achieving rigid fixation of the upper cervical spine in the pediatric population.

Abbreviations used in this paper: rhBMP = recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein; VA = vertebral artery.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: David J. Sacco, M.D., Neurosurgeons for Children, 1935 Motor Street, Dallas, Texas 75235. email: dsacco@nsfc.us.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Sagittal reconstruction CT scans demonstrating a C-2 pars deemed suitable for screw placement (left) and another deemed unsuitable (right) given its shape (arrow).

  • View in gallery

    Case 6. Preoperative (A and B) and postoperative (C and D) flexion and extension lateral cervical spine radiographs obtained in a 5-year-old girl. Resolution of posttraumatic atlantoaxial instability is demonstrated.

References

  • 1

    Anderson RCRagel BTMocco JBohman LEBrockmeyer DL: Selection of a rigid internal fixation construct for stabilization at the craniovertebral junction in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 107:1 Suppl36422007

  • 2

    Aryan HENewman CBNottmeier EWAcosta FL JrWang VYAmes CP: Stabilization of the atlantoaxial complex via C-1 lateral mass and C-2 pedicle screw fixation in a multicenter clinical experience in 102 patients: modification of the Harms and Goel techniques. J Neurosurg Spine 8:2222292008

  • 3

    Belen DSimsek SYigitkanli KBavbek M: Internal reduction established by occiput-C2 pedicle polyaxial screw stabilization in pediatric atlantoaxial rotatory fixation. Pediatr Neurosurg 42:3283322006

  • 4

    Benglis DWang MYLevi AD: A comprehensive review of the safety profile of bone morphogenetic protein in spine surgery. Neurosurgery 62:5 Suppl 2ONS423ONS4312008

  • 5

    Brockmeyer DApfelbaum RTippets RWalker MCarey L: Pediatric cervical spine instrumentation using screw fixation. Pediatr Neurosurg 22:1471571995

  • 6

    Brockmeyer DL: Lateral mass screw fixation of C-1. J Neurosurg 107:2 Suppl1731772007

  • 7

    Brockmeyer DLYork JEApfelbaum RI: Anatomical suitability of C1-2 transarticular screw placement in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 92:1 Suppl7112000

  • 8

    Currier BLMaus TPEck JCLarson DRYaszemski MJ: Relationship of the internal carotid artery to the anterior aspect of the C1 vertebra: implications for C1–C2 transarticular and C1 lateral mass fixation. Spine 33:6356392008

  • 9

    Dong YHong MXJianyi LLin MY: Quantitative anatomy of the lateral mass of the atlas. Spine 28:8608632003

  • 10

    Gluf WMBrockmeyer DL: Atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation: a review of surgical indications, fusion rate, complications, and lessons learned in 67 pediatric patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2:1641692005

  • 11

    Gorek JAcaroglu EBerven SYousef APuttlitz CM: Constructs incorporating intralaminar C2 screws provide rigid stability for atlantoaxial fixation. Spine 30:151315182005

  • 12

    Harms JMelcher RP: Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine 26:246724712001

  • 13

    Härtl RChamberlain RHFifield MSChou DSonntag VKCrawford NR: Biomechanical comparison of two new atlantoaxial fixation techniques with C1–2 transarticular screwgraft fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 5:3363422006

  • 14

    Hott JSLynch JJChamberlain RHSonntag VKCrawford NR: Biomechanical comparison of C1–2 posterior fixation techniques. J Neurosurg Spine 2:1751812005

  • 15

    Jea ATaylor MDDirks PBKulkarni AVRutka JTDrake JM: Incorporation of C-1 lateral mass screws in occipitocervical and atlantoaxial fusions for children 8 years of age or younger. J Neurosurg 107:2 Suppl1781832007

  • 16

    Kuroki HRengachary SSGoel VKHolekamp SAPitkänen VEbraheim NA: Biomechanical comparison of two stabilization techniques of the atlantoaxial joints: transarticular screw fixation versus screw and rod fixation. Neurosurgery 56:1 Suppl1511592005

  • 17

    Leonard JRWright NM: Pediatric atlantoaxial fixation with bilateral, crossing C-2 translaminar screws. Technical note. J Neurosurg 104:1 Suppl59632006

  • 18

    Lowry DWPollack IFClyde BAlbright ALAdelson PD: Upper cervical spine fusion in the pediatric population. J Neurosurg 87:6716761997

  • 19

    Magerl FSeemann PSStable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular screw fixation. Kehr PWeidner A: Cervical Spine Vol 1:ViennaSpringer-Verlag1987. 322327

  • 20

    Oluigbo COSolanki GA: Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to enhance posterior cervical spine fusion at 2 years of age: technical note. Pediatr Neurosurg 44:3933962008

  • 21

    Paramore CGDickman CASonntag VK: The anatomical suitability of the C1–2 complex for transarticular screw fixation. J Neurosurg 85:2212241996

  • 22

    Rahimi SYStevens EAYeh DJFlannery AMChoudhri HFLee MR: Treatment of atlantoaxial instability in pediatric patients. Neurosurg Focus 15:6ECP12003

  • 23

    Reilly CWChoit RL: Transarticular screws in the management of C1–C2 instability in children. J Pediatr Orthop 26:5825882006

  • 24

    Sciubba DMNoggle JCVellimana AKConway JEKretzer RMLong DM: Laminar screw fixation of the axis. J Neurosurg Spine 8:3273342008

  • 25

    Stokes JKVillavicencio ATLiu PCBray RSJohnson JP: Posterior atlantoaxial stabilization: new alternative to C1–2 transarticular screws. Neurosurg Focus 12:1E62002

  • 26

    Stulik JVyskocil TSebesta PKryl J: Atlantoaxial fixation using the polyaxial screw-rod system. Eur Spine J 16:4794842007

  • 27

    Taggard DAKraut MAClark CRTraynelis VC: Case-control study comparing the efficacy of surgical techniques for C1–C2 arthrodesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:1891942004

  • 28

    Taggard DAMenezes AHRyken TC: Treatment of Down syndrome-associated craniovertebral junction abnormalities. J Neurosurg 93:2 Suppl2052132000

  • 29

    Tan MWang HWang YZhang GYi PLi Z: Morphometric evaluation of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass. Spine 28:8888952003

  • 30

    Wang JVokshoor AKim SElton SKosnik EBartkowski H: Pediatric atlantoaxial instability: management with screw fixation. Pediatr Neurosurg 30:70781999

  • 31

    Wright NM: Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:1581622004

  • 32

    Wright NMLauryssen C: Vertebral artery injury in C1–2 transarticular screw fixation: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves. J Neurosurg 88:6346401998

  • 33

    Yoshida MNeo MFujibayashi SNakamura T: Comparison of the anatomical risk for vertebral artery injury associated with the C2-pedicle screw and atlantoaxial transarticular screw. Spine 31:E513E5172006

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 66 66 10
Full Text Views 114 114 2
PDF Downloads 131 131 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar