A propensity-adjusted comparison of endoscopic endonasal surgery versus transcranial microsurgery for pediatric craniopharyngioma: a single-center study

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $515.00
USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

When comparing endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) and transcranial microsurgery (TCM) for adult and mixed-age population craniopharyngiomas, EES has become an alternative to TCM. To date, studies comparing EES and TCM for pediatric craniopharyngiomas are sparse. In this study, the authors aimed to compare postoperative complications and surgical outcomes between EES and TCM for pediatric craniopharyngiomas.

METHODS

The data of pediatric patients with craniopharyngiomas who underwent surgery between February 2009 and June 2021 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. All included cases were divided into EES and TCM groups according to the treatment modality received. The baseline characteristics of patients were compared between the groups, as well as surgical results, perioperative complications, and long-term outcomes. To control for confounding factors, propensity-adjusted analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 51 pediatric craniopharyngioma surgeries were identified in 49 patients, among which 35 were treated with EES and 16 were treated with TCM. The proportion of gross-total resection (GTR) was similar between the groups (94.3% for EES vs 75% for TCM, p = 0.130). TCM was associated with a lower rate of hypogonadism (33.3% vs 64.7%, p = 0.042) and a higher rate of growth hormone deficiency (73.3% vs 26.5%, p = 0.002), permanent diabetes insipidus (DI) (60.0% vs 29.4%, p = 0.043), and panhypopituitarism (80.0% vs 47.1%, p = 0.032) at the last follow-up. CSF leakage only occurred in the EES group, with no significant difference observed between the groups (p > 0.99). TCM significantly increased the risk of worsened visual outcomes (25.0% vs 0.0%, p = 0.012). However, TCM was associated with a significantly longer median duration of follow-up (66.0 vs 40.5 months, p = 0.007) and a significantly lower rate of preoperative hypogonadism (18.8% vs 60.0%, p = 0.006). The propensity-adjusted analysis revealed no difference in the rate of recurrence, hypogonadism, or permanent DI. Additionally, EES was associated with a lower median gain in BMI (1.5 kg/m2 vs 7.5 kg/m2, p = 0.046) and better hypothalamic function (58.3% vs 8.3%, p = 0.027) at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TCM, EES was associated with a superior visual outcome, better endocrinological and hypothalamic function, and less BMI gain, but comparable rates of GTR, recurrence, and perioperative complications. These findings have indicated that EES is a safe and effective surgical modality and can be a viable alternative to TCM for pediatric midline craniopharyngiomas.

ABBREVIATIONS

DI = diabetes insipidus; EES = endoscopic endonasal surgery; EOR = extent of resection; GTR = gross-total resection; STR = subtotal resection; TCM = transcranial microsurgery.

Image from Jeon et al. (pp 319–324).

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $515.00
USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Müller HL, Merchant TE, Warmuth-Metz M, Martinez-Barbera JP, Puget S. Craniopharyngioma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):75.

  • 2

    Bunin GR, Surawicz TS, Witman PA, Preston-Martin S, Davis F, Bruner JM. The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg. 1998;89(4):547551.

  • 3

    Olsson DS, Andersson E, Bryngelsson IL, Nilsson AG, Johannsson G. Excess mortality and morbidity in patients with craniopharyngioma, especially in patients with childhood onset: a population-based study in Sweden. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(2):467474.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Zacharia BE, Bruce SS, Goldstein H, Malone HR, Neugut AI, Bruce JN. Incidence, treatment and survival of patients with craniopharyngioma in the surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14(8):10701078.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Müller HL. Paediatrics: surgical strategy and quality of life in craniopharyngioma. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9(8):447449.

  • 6

    Müller HL, Gebhardt U, Etavard-Gorris N, Korenke E, Warmuth-Metz M, Kolb R, et al. Prognosis and sequela in patients with childhood craniopharyngioma—results of HIT-ENDO and update on KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2000. Klin Padiatr. 2004;216(6):343348.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Tang B, Xie S, Huang G, Wang Z, Yang L, Yang X, et al. Clinical features and operative technique of transinfundibular craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg. 2019;133(1):119128.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Forbes JA, Ordóñez-Rubiano EG, Tomasiewicz HC, Banu MA, Younus I, Dobri GA, et al. Endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of intrinsic third ventricular craniopharyngioma: surgical results. J Neurosurg. 2019;131(4):11521162.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Moussazadeh N, Prabhu V, Bander ED, Cusic RC, Tsiouris AJ, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas: a case-matched single-institution analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;41(6):E7.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Jeswani S, Nuño M, Wu A, Bonert V, Carmichael JD, Black KL, et al. Comparative analysis of outcomes following craniotomy and expanded endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of craniopharyngioma and related tumors: a single-institution study. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(3):627638.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Cavallo LM, Frank G, Cappabianca P, Solari D, Mazzatenta D, Villa A, et al. The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(1):100113.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Devaney KO, Strojan P, Suárez C, et al. Craniopharyngioma: a pathologic, clinical, and surgical review. Head Neck. 2012;34(7):10361044.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Fan J, Liu Y, Pan J, Peng Y, Peng J, Bao Y, et al. Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial surgery for primary resection of craniopharyngiomas based on a new QST classification system: a comparative series of 315 patients. J Neurosurg. 2021;135(5):12981309.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Li X, Wu W, Miao Q, He M, Zhang S, Zhang Z, et al. Endocrine and metabolic outcomes after transcranial and endoscopic endonasal approaches for primary resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg. 2019;121:e8e14.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Marx S, Tsavdaridou I, Paul S, Steveling A, Schirmer C, Eördögh M, et al. Quality of life and olfactory function after suprasellar craniopharyngioma surgery—a single-center experience comparing transcranial and endoscopic endonasal approaches. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44(3):15691582.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Wannemuehler TJ, Rubel KE, Hendricks BK, Ting JY, Payner TD, Shah MV, Cohen-Gadol AA. Outcomes in transcranial microsurgery versus extended endoscopic endonasal approach for primary resection of adult craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;41(6):E6.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Soldozy S, Yeghyayan M, Yağmurlu K, Norat P, Taylor DG, Kalani MYS, et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery outcomes for pediatric craniopharyngioma: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;48(1):E6.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    d’Avella E, Solari D, Somma T, Miccoli G, Milicevic M, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM. The endoscopic endonasal approach for pediatric craniopharyngiomas: the key lessons learned. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019;35(11):21472155.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Mazzatenta D, Zoli M, Guaraldi F, Ambrosi F, Faustini Fustini M, Pasquini E, et al. Outcome of endoscopic endonasal surgery in pediatric craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:e277e288.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Alalade AF, Ogando-Rivas E, Boatey J, Souweidane MM, Anand VK, Greenfield JP, Schwartz TH. Suprasellar and recurrent pediatric craniopharyngiomas: expanding indications for the extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;21(1):7280.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Madsen PJ, Buch VP, Douglas JE, Parasher AK, Lerner DK, Alexander E, et al. Endoscopic endonasal resection versus open surgery for pediatric craniopharyngioma: comparison of outcomes and complications. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019;24(3):236245.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Dho YS, Kim YH, Se YB, Han DH, Kim JH, Park CK, et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngioma: the importance of the relationship between pituitary stalk and tumor. J Neurosurg. 2018;129(3):611619.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Puget S, Garnett M, Wray A, Grill J, Habrand JL, Bodaert N, et al. Pediatric craniopharyngiomas: classification and treatment according to the degree of hypothalamic involvement. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(1)(suppl):312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    De Vile CJ, Grant DB, Kendall BE, Neville BG, Stanhope R, Watkins KE, Hayward RD. Management of childhood craniopharyngioma: can the morbidity of radical surgery be predicted?. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(1):7381.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Elowe-Gruau E, Beltrand J, Brauner R, Pinto G, Samara-Boustani D, Thalassinos C, et al. Childhood craniopharyngioma: hypothalamus-sparing surgery decreases the risk of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(6):23762382.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Ravindra VM, Okcu MF, Ruggieri L, Frank TS, Paulino AC, McGovern SL, et al. Comparison of multimodal surgical and radiation treatment methods for pediatric craniopharyngioma: long-term analysis of progression-free survival and morbidity. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021;28(2):152159.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Clark AJ, Cage TA, Aranda D, Parsa AT, Auguste KI, Gupta N. Treatment-related morbidity and the management of pediatric craniopharyngioma: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012;10(4):293301.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Kiehna EN, Merchant TE. Radiation therapy for pediatric craniopharyngioma. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28(4):E10.

  • 29

    Liu AK, Bagrosky B, Fenton LZ, Gaspar LE, Handler MH, McNatt SA, Foreman NK. Vascular abnormalities in pediatric craniopharyngioma patients treated with radiation therapy. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;52(2):227230.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Ozgural O, Kahilogullari G, Dogan I, Al-Beyati ESM, Bozkurt M, Tetik B, et al. Single-center surgical experience of the treatment of craniopharyngiomas with emphasis on the operative approach: endoscopic endonasal and open microscopic transcranial approaches. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(6):e572e578.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Komotar RJ, Starke RM, Raper DM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas. World Neurosurg. 2012;77(2):329341.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Leng LZ, Greenfield JP, Souweidane MM, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic, endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas: analysis of outcome including extent of resection, cerebrospinal fluid leak, return to preoperative productivity, and body mass index. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(1):110124.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Sterkenburg AS, Hoffmann A, Gebhardt U, Warmuth-Metz M, Daubenbüchel AM, Müller HL. Survival, hypothalamic obesity, and neuropsychological/psychosocial status after childhood-onset craniopharyngioma: newly reported long-term outcomes. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17(7):10291038.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Pascual JM, Prieto R, Castro-Dufourny I, Mongardi L, Rosdolsky M, Strauss S, et al. Craniopharyngiomas primarily involving the hypothalamus: a model of neurosurgical lesions to elucidate the neurobiological basis of psychiatric disorders. World Neurosurg. 2018;120:e1245e1278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 419 419 103
Full Text Views 54 54 4
PDF Downloads 96 96 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0