Pediatric stereo-electroencephalography: effects of robot assistance and other variables on seizure outcome and complications

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurosurgery,
  • | 2 Neurology, and
  • | 3 Neurophysiology, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

The safety of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) has been investigated; however, most studies have not differentiated pediatric and adult populations, which have different anatomy and physiology. The purpose of this study was to assess SEEG safety in the pediatric setting, focusing on surgical complications and the identification of patient and surgical risk factors, if any. The authors also aimed to determine whether robot assistance in SEEG was associated with a change in practice, surgical parameters, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively studied all SEEG cases performed in their department from December 2014 to March 2020. They analyzed both demographic and surgical variables and noted the types of surgery-related complications and their management. They also studied the clinical outcomes of a subset of the patients in relation to robot-assisted and non–robot-assisted SEEG.

RESULTS

Sixty-three children had undergone 64 SEEG procedures. Girls were on average 3 years younger than the boys (mean age 11.1 vs 14.1 years, p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 6.3%, and the complication rate for patients with left-sided electrodes was higher than that for patients with right-sided electrodes (11.1% vs 3.3%), although the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The duration of recording was positively correlated to the number of implanted electrodes (r = 0.296, p < 0.05). Robot assistance was associated with a higher number of implanted electrodes (mean 12.6 vs 7.6 electrodes, p < 0.0001). Robot-assisted implantations were more accurate, with a mean error of 1.51 mm at the target compared to 2.98 mm in nonrobot implantations (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were assessed in the first 32 patients treated (16 in the nonrobot group and 16 in the robot group), 23 of whom proceeded to further resective surgery. The children who had undergone robot-assisted SEEG had better eventual seizure control following subsequent epilepsy surgery. Of the children who had undergone resective epilepsy surgery, 42% (5/12) in the nonrobot group and 82% (9/11) in the robot group obtained an Engel class IA outcome at 1 year (χ2 = 3.885, p = 0.049). Based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the robot group had a higher seizure-free rate than the nonrobot group at 30 months postoperation (7/11 vs 2/12, p = 0.063). Two complications, whose causes were attributed to the implantation and head-bandaging steps, required surgical intervention. All complications were either transient or reversible.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest single-center, exclusively pediatric SEEG series that includes robot assistance so far. SEEG complications are uncommon and usually transient or treatable. Robot assistance enabled implantation of more electrodes and improved epilepsy surgery outcomes, as compared to those in the non–robot-assisted cases.

ABBREVIATIONS

CT = computed tomography; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; SEEG = stereo-electroencephalography.

Image from Mavridis et al. (pp 404–415).

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Bourdillon P, Châtillon CE, Moles A, et al. Effective accuracy of stereoelectroencephalography: robotic 3D versus Talairach orthogonal approaches. J Neurosurg. 2018;131(6):19381946.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Gonzalez-Martinez J, Lachhwani D. Stereoelectroencephalography in children with cortical dysplasia: technique and results. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30(11):18531857.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Abel TJ, Varela Osorio R, Amorim-Leite R, et al. Frameless robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography in children: technical aspects and comparison with Talairach frame technique. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;22(1):3746.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Cardinale F, Rizzi M, Vignati E, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography: retrospective analysis of 742 procedures in a single centre. Brain. 2019;142(9):26882704.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Cossu M, Cardinale F, Colombo N, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography in the presurgical evaluation of children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. J Neurosurg. 2005;103(4)(suppl):333343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    González-Martínez J, Bulacio J, Thompson S, et al. Technique, results, and complications related to robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography. Neurosurgery. 2016;78(2):169180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Ho AL, Muftuoglu Y, Pendharkar AV, et al. Robot-guided pediatric stereoelectroencephalography: single-institution experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;22(5):489496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Mullin JP, Shriver M, Alomar S, et al. Is SEEG safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis of stereo-electroencephalography-related complications. Epilepsia. 2016;57(3):386401.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Ollivier I, Behr C, Cebula H, et al. Efficacy and safety in frameless robot-assisted stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) for drug-resistant epilepsy. Neurochirurgie. 2017;63(4):286290.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Scorza D, De Momi E, Plaino L, et al. Retrospective evaluation and SEEG trajectory analysis for interactive multi-trajectory planner assistant. Int J CARS. 2017;12(10):17271738.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    van der Loo LE, Schijns OEMG, Hoogland G, et al. Methodology, outcome, safety and in vivo accuracy in traditional frame-based stereoelectroencephalography. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159(9):17331746.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Willems LM, Reif PS, Spyrantis A, et al. Invasive EEG-electrodes in presurgical evaluation of epilepsies: Systematic analysis of implantation-, video-EEG-monitoring- and explantation-related complications, and review of literature. Epilepsy Behav. 2019;91:3037.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Goldstein HE, Youngerman BE, Shao B, et al. Safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography in pediatric focal epilepsy: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;22(4):444452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Bottan JS, Rubino PA, Lau JC, et al. Robot-assisted insular depth electrode implantation through oblique trajectories: 3-dimensional anatomical nuances, technique, accuracy, and safety. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;18(3):278283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Alomar S, Mullin JP, Smithason S, Gonzalez-Martinez J. Indications, technique, and safety profile of insular stereoelectroencephalography electrode implantation in medically intractable epilepsy. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(4):11471157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Bourdillon P, Ryvlin P, Isnard J, et al. Stereotactic electroencephalography is a safe procedure, including for insular implantations. World Neurosurg.2017;99:353361.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Dylgjeri S, Taussig D, Chipaux M, et al. Insular and insulo-opercular epilepsy in childhood: an SEEG study. Seizure. 2014;23(4):300308.

  • 18

    Kappen P, Eltze C, Tisdall M, et al. Stereo-EEG exploration in the insula/operculum in paediatric patients with refractory epilepsy. Seizure. 2020;78:6370.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Salado AL, Koessler L, De Mijolla G, et al. sEEG is a safe procedure for a comprehensive anatomic exploration of the insula: a retrospective study of 108 procedures representing 254 transopercular insular electrodes. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018;14(1):18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Méreaux JL, Gilard V, Le Goff F, et al. Practice of stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) in drug-resistant epilepsy: Retrospective series with surgery and thermocoagulation outcomes. Neurochirurgie. 2020;66(3):139143.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Taussig D, Chipaux M, Lebas A, et al. Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) in 65 children: an effective and safe diagnostic method for pre-surgical diagnosis, independent of age. Epileptic Disord. 2014;16(3):280295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    McGovern RA, Knight EP, Gupta A, et al. Robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;23(3):288296.

  • 23

    Taylor DC. Differential rates of cerebral maturation between sexes and between hemispheres. Evidence from epilepsy. Lancet. 1969;2(7612):140142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    McGovern RA, Ruggieri P, Bulacio J, et al. Risk analysis of hemorrhage in stereo-electroencephalography procedures. Epilepsia. 2019;60(3):571580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Budke M, Avecillas-Chasin JM, Villarejo F. Implantation of depth electrodes in children using VarioGuide® frameless navigation system: technical note. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018;15(3):302309.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Kim LH, Parker JJ, Ho AL, et al. Postoperative outcomes following pediatric intracranial electrode monitoring: a case for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). Epilepsy Behav. 2020;104(pt A):106905.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Cobourn K, Fayed I, Keating RF, Oluigbo CO. Early outcomes of stereoelectroencephalography followed by MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy: a paradigm for minimally invasive epilepsy surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;45(3):E8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    De Benedictis A, Trezza A, Carai A, et al. Robot-assisted procedures in pediatric neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(5):E7.

  • 29

    Candela-Cantó S, Aparicio J, López JM, et al. Frameless robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography for refractory epilepsy in pediatric patients: accuracy, usefulness, and technical issues. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160(12):24892500.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Cardinale F, Cossu M, Castana L, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography: surgical methodology, safety, and stereotactic application accuracy in 500 procedures. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(3):353366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Dorfmüller G, Ferrand-Sorbets S, Fohlen M, et al. Outcome of surgery in children with focal cortical dysplasia younger than 5 years explored by stereo-electroencephalography. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30(11):18751883.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Gonzalez-Martinez J, Bulacio J, Alexopoulos A, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography in the “difficult to localize” refractory focal epilepsy: early experience from a North American epilepsy center. Epilepsia. 2013;54(2):323330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Mathon B, Clemenceau S, Hasboun D, et al. Safety profile of intracranial electrode implantation for video-EEG recordings in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. J Neurol. 2015;262(12):26992712.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Cossu M, Schiariti M, Francione S, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography in the presurgical evaluation of focal epilepsy in infancy and early childhood. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012;9(3):290300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Cossu M, Cardinale F, Castana L, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography in the presurgical evaluation of focal epilepsy: a retrospective analysis of 215 procedures. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4):706718.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Gonzalez-Martinez J, Mullin J, Vadera S, et al. Stereotactic placement of depth electrodes in medically intractable epilepsy. J Neurosurg. 2014;120(3):639644.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Liava A, Mai R, Tassi L, et al. Paediatric epilepsy surgery in the posterior cortex: a study of 62 cases. Epileptic Disord. 2014;16(2):141164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Serletis D, Bulacio J, Bingaman W, et al. The stereotactic approach for mapping epileptic networks: a prospective study of 200 patients. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(5):12391246.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Yang M, Ma Y, Li W, et al. A retrospective analysis of stereoelectroencephalography and subdural electroencephalography for preoperative evaluation of intractable epilepsy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2017;95(1):1320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Toledano R, Martínez-Álvarez R, Jiménez-Huete A, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography in the preoperative assessment of patients with refractory focal epilepsy: experience at an epilepsy centre. Article in Spanish. Neurologia. Published online July 20, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.nrl.2019.05.002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Munari C, Hoffmann D, Francione S, et al. Stereo-electroencephalography methodology: advantages and limits. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 1994;152:5669.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Guenot M, Isnard J, Ryvlin P, et al. Neurophysiological monitoring for epilepsy surgery: the Talairach SEEG method. StereoElectroEncephaloGraphy. Indications, results, complications and therapeutic applications in a series of 100 consecutive cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2001;77(1-4):2932.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Zhang G, Chen G, Meng D, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography based on the Leksell stereotactic frame and Neurotech operation planning software. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(23):e7106.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Dewan MC, Shults R, Hale AT, et al. Stereotactic EEG via multiple single-path omnidirectional trajectories within a single platform: institutional experience with a novel technique. J Neurosurg. 2018;129(5):11731181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Tandon N, Tong BA, Friedman ER, et al. Analysis of morbidity and outcomes associated with use of subdural grids vs stereoelectroencephalography in patients with intractable epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(6):672681.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46

    Alexander H, Fayed I, Oluigbo CO. Rigid cranial fixation for robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography in toddlers: technical considerations. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020;18(6):614620.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47

    Joswig H, Lau JC, Abdallat M, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography versus subdural strip electrode implantations: feasibility, complications, and outcomes in 500 intracranial monitoring cases for drug-resistant epilepsy. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(1):E23E30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48

    Narváez-Martínez Y, García S, Roldán P, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography by using O-Arm® and Vertek® passive articulated arm: technical note and experience of an epilepsy referral centre. Article in Spanish. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2016;27(6):277284.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49

    Sacino MF, Huang SS, Schreiber J, et al. Is the use of stereotactic electroencephalography safe and effective in children? A meta-analysis of the use of stereotactic electroencephalography in comparison to subdural grids for invasive epilepsy monitoring in pediatric subjects. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(6):11901200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50

    Vadera S, Mullin J, Bulacio J, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography following subdural grid placement for difficult to localize epilepsy. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(5):723729.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51

    Engel J Jr, Van Ness PC, Rasmussen TB, Ojemann LM. Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. In: Engel J Jr, ed.Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies.2nd ed. Raven Press;1993:609621.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 136 136 136
Full Text Views 49 49 49
PDF Downloads 86 86 86
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0