The quality of YouTube videos on endoscopic third ventriculostomy and endoscopic third ventriculostomy with choroid plexus cauterization procedures available to families of patients with pediatric hydrocephalus

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Division of Neurosurgery, Alberta Children’s Hospital, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada;
  • 2 Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and
  • 3 Hydrocephalus Association, Bethesda, Maryland
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

YouTube has become an important information source for pediatric neurosurgical patients and their families. The goal of this study was to determine whether the informative quality of videos of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and endoscopic third ventriculostomy with choroid plexus cauterization (ETV + CPC) is associated with metrics of popularity.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used comprehensive search terms to identify videos pertaining to ETV and ETV + CPC presented on the first 3 pages of search results on YouTube. Two pediatric neurosurgeons, 1 neurosurgery resident, and 2 patient families independently reviewed the selected videos. Videos were assessed for overall informational quality by using a validated 5-point Global Quality Score (GQS) and compared to online metrics of popularity and engagement such as views, likes, likes/views ratio, comments/views ratio, and likes/dislikes ratio. Weighted kappa scores were used to measure agreement between video reviewers.

RESULTS

A total of 58 videos (47 on ETV, 7 on ETV + CPC, 4 on both) of 120 videos assessed met the inclusion criteria. Video styles included “technical” (62%), “lecture” (24%), “patient testimonial” (4%), and “other” (10%). In terms of GQS, substantial agreement was seen between surgeons (kappa 0.67 [95% CI 0.55, 0.80]) and excellent agreement was found between each surgeon and the neurosurgical resident (0.77 [95% CI 0.66, 0.88] and 0.89 [95% CI 0.82, 0.97]). Only fair to moderate agreement was seen between professionals and patient families, with weighted kappa scores ranging from 0.07 to 0.56. Academic lectures were more likely to be rated good or excellent (64% vs 0%, p < 0.001) versus surgical procedure and testimonial video types. There were significant associations between a better GQS and more likes (p = 0.01), views (p = 0.02), and the likes/dislikes ratio (p = 0.016). The likes/views ratio (p = 0.31) and comments/views ratio (p = 0.35) were not associated with GQS. The number of likes (p = 0.02), views (p = 0.03), and the likes/dislikes ratio (p = 0.015) were significantly associated with video style (highest for lecture-style videos).

CONCLUSIONS

Medical professionals tended to agree when assessing the overall quality of YouTube videos, but this agreement was not as strongly seen when compared to parental ratings. The online metrics of likes, views, and likes/dislikes ratio appear to predict quality. Neurosurgeons seeking to increase their online footprint via YouTube would be well advised to focus more on the academic lecture style because these were universally better rated.

ABBREVIATIONS CPC = choroid plexus cauterization; ETV = endoscopic third ventriculostomy; GQS = Global Quality Score; IQR = interquartile range.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Jay Riva-Cambrin: Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada. jay.rivacambrin@ucalgary.ca.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 6, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2019.12.PEDS19523.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

  • 1

    Anderson M: 5 facts about online video, for YouTube’s 10th birthday. Fact Tank. February 12, 2015 (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/02/12/5-facts-about-online-video-for-youtubes-10th-birthday/) [Accessed January 20, 2020]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Antheunis ML, Tates K, Nieboer TE: Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ Couns 92:426431, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Backinger CL, Pilsner AM, Augustson EM, Frydl A, Phillips T, Rowden J: YouTube as a source of quitting smoking information. Tob Control 20:119122, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S: A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol 102:20702077, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK: Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjögren’s syndrome? Oral Dis 22:196201, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Dewan MC, Rattani A, Mekary R, Glancz LJ, Yunusa I, Baticulon RE, : Global hydrocephalus epidemiology and incidence: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 130:10651079, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER: Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. JAMA 287:26912700, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Fat MJ, Doja A, Barrowman N, Sell E: YouTube videos as a teaching tool and patient resource for infantile spasms. J Child Neurol 26:804809, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Fernell E, Hagberg G, Hagberg B: Infantile hydrocephalus epidemiology: an indicator of enhanced survival. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 70:F123F128, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Fox SD, Duggan M: Health Online 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2013 (https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/) [Accessed January 20, 2020]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Gabarron E, Fernandez-Luque L, Armayones M, Lau AY: Identifying measures used for assessing quality of YouTube videos with patient health information: a review of current literature. Interact J Med Res 2:e6, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Garne E, Loane M, Addor MC, Boyd PA, Barisic I, Dolk H: Congenital hydrocephalus—prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy in four European regions. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 14:150155, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Health on the Net: HONcode Principles. Chêne-Bourg, Switzerland: Health on the Net (https://www.hon.ch/en/) [Accessed January 20, 2020]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    iProspect: iProspect Search Engine User Behavior Study. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, 2006 (http://district4.extension.ifas.ufl.edu/Tech/TechPubs/WhitePaper_2006_SearchEngineUserBehavior.pdf) [Accessed January 20, 2020]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Isaacs AM, Riva-Cambrin J, Yavin D, Hockley A, Pringsheim TM, Jette N, : Age-specific global epidemiology of hydrocephalus: systematic review, metanalysis and global birth surveillance. PLoS One 13:e0204926, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Jeng S, Gupta N, Wrensch M, Zhao S, Wu YW: Prevalence of congenital hydrocephalus in California, 1991-2000. Pediatr Neurol 45:6771, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Roth J, Constantini S: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. J Pediatr 155:254259.e1, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Kulkarni AV, Riva-Cambrin J, Browd SR: Use of the ETV Success Score to explain the variation in reported endoscopic third ventriculostomy success rates among published case series of childhood hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:143146, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Kulkarni AV, Riva-Cambrin J, Browd SR, Drake JM, Holubkov R, Kestle JR, : Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization in infants with hydrocephalus: a retrospective Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 14:224229, 2014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Kulkarni AV, Riva-Cambrin J, Rozzelle CJ, Naftel RP, Alvey JS, Reeder RW, : Endoscopic third ventriculostomy and choroid plexus cauterization in infant hydrocephalus: a prospective study by the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network. J Neurosurg Pediatr 21:214223, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Naftel RP, Safiano NA, Falola MI, Shannon CN, Wellons JC III, Johnston JM Jr: Technology preferences among caregivers of children with hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:2636, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Persson EK, Anderson S, Wiklund LM, Uvebrant P: Hydrocephalus in children born in 1999–2002: epidemiology, outcome and ophthalmological findings. Childs Nerv Syst 23:11111118, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Pew Research Center: Social Media Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center, 2019 (https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/) [Accessed January 20, 2020]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Robertson M: 3 metrics ratios to measure YouTube channel success. Tubular Insights. September 18, 2014 (https://tubularinsights.com/3-metrics-youtube-success/) [Accessed January 20, 2020]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Robertson M: Your YouTube likes and dislikes bar: how much does it matter? Tubular Insights. June 5, 2013 (https://tubularinsights.com/youtube-likes-dislikes-bar-how-much-does-it-matter/) [Accessed January 20, 2020]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Sood A, Sarangi S, Pandey A, Murugiah K: YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease. Urology 77:558562, 2011

  • 27

    Sorensen JA, Pusz MD, Brietzke SE: YouTube as an information source for pediatric adenotonsillectomy and ear tube surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78:6570, 2014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Stellefson M, Chaney B, Ochipa K, Chaney D, Haider Z, Hanik B, : YouTube as a source of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patient education: a social media content analysis. Chron Respir Dis 11:6171, 2014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Van de Belt TH, Berben SA, Samsom M, Engelen LJ, Schoonhoven L: Use of social media by Western European hospitals: longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 14:e61, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Warf BC: Comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy alone and combined with choroid plexus cauterization in infants younger than 1 year of age: a prospective study in 550 African children. J Neurosurg 103 (6 Suppl):475481, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    YouTube: YouTube for press. YouTube.com (https://www.youtube.com/about/press/) [Accessed January 20, 2020]

    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 62 62 48
Full Text Views 17 17 16
PDF Downloads 18 18 18
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0