Intraoperative electrophysiology during single-level selective dorsal rhizotomy: technique, stimulation threshold, and response data in a series of 145 patients

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurosurgery,
  • 3 Neurophysiology, and
  • 4 Neurodisability, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom; and
  • 2 Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is effective at permanently reducing spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy. The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in this procedure remains controversial, and its robustness has been questioned. This study describes the authors’ institutional electrophysiological technique (based on the technique of Park et al.), intraoperative findings, robustness, value to the procedure, and occurrence of new motor or sphincter deficits.

METHODS

The authors analyzed electrophysiological data of all children who underwent SDR at their center between September 2013 and February 2019. All patients underwent bilateral SDR through a single-level laminotomy at the conus and with transection of about 60% of the L2–S2 afferent rootlets (guided by intraoperative electrophysiology) and about 50% of L1 afferent roots (nonselectively).

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five patients underwent SDR (64% male, mean age 6 years and 7 months, range 2 years and 9 months to 14 years and 10 months). Dorsal roots were distinguished from ventral roots anatomically and electrophysiologically, by assessing responses on free-running electromyography (EMG) and determining stimulation thresholds (≥ 0.2 mA in all dorsal rootlets). Root level was determined anatomically and electrophysiologically by assessing electromyographic response to stimulation. Median stimulation threshold was lower in sacral compared to lumbar roots (p < 0.001), and 16% higher on the first operated (right) side (p = 0.023), but unrelated to age, sex, or functional status. Similarly, responses to tetanic stimulation were consistent: 87% were graded 3+ or 4+, with similar distributions between sides. This was also unrelated to age, sex, and functional status. The L2–S2 rootlets were divided (median 60%, range 50%–67%), guided by response to tetanic stimulation at threshold amplitude. No new motor or sphincter deficits were observed, suggesting sparing of ventral roots and sphincteric innervation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This electrophysiological technique appears robust and reproducible, allowing reliable identification of afferent nerve roots, definition of root levels, and guidance for rootlet division. Only a direct comparative study will establish whether intraoperative electrophysiology during SDR minimizes risk of new motor or sphincter worsening and/or maximizes functional outcome.

ABBREVIATIONS CI = confidence interval; CP = cerebral palsy; EMG = electromyography; GMFCS = Gross Motor Function Classification System; SDR = selective dorsal rhizotomy.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplementary Table 1 and Figs. 1 and 2 (PDF 501 KB)

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Kristian Aquilina: Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom. kristian.aquilina@gosh.nhs.uk.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online February 28, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2019.12.PEDS19372.

P.D.V. and T.J.H. contributed equally to this study and share first authorship.

Disclosures Dr. De Vloo reports receiving grants for travel and education from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and St. Jude/Abbott.

  • 1

    Abbe R: Resection of the posterior roots of spinal nerves to relieve pain, pain reflex, athetosis and spastic paralysis—Dana’s operation. Med Rec 79:377381, 1911

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Aquilina K, Graham D, Wimalasundera N: Selective dorsal rhizotomy: an old treatment re-emerging. Arch Dis Child 100:798802, 2015

  • 3

    Cahan LD, Kundi MS, McPherson D, Starr A, Peacock W: Electrophysiologic studies in selective dorsal rhizotomy for spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Appl Neurophysiol 50:459462, 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Chicoine MR, Park TS, Kaufman BA: Selective dorsal rhizotomy and rates of orthopedic surgery in children with spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg 86:3439, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Decandia M, Provini L, Taborikova H: Mechanisms of the reflex discharge depression in the spinal motoneurone during repetitive orthodromic stimulation. Brain Res 4:284291, 1967

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Fasano VA, Barolat-Romana G, Zeme S, Squazzi A: Electrophysiological assessment of spinal circuits in spasticity by direct dorsal root stimulation. Neurosurgery 4:146151, 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Fasano VA, Broggi G, Barolat-Romana G, Sguazzi A: Surgical treatment of spasticity in cerebral palsy. Childs Brain 4:289305, 1978

  • 8

    Foerster O: On the indications and results of the excision of posterior spinal nerve roots in men. Surg Gynecol Obstet 16:463474, 1913

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Fukuhara T, Nakatsu D, Namba Y, Yamadori I: Histological evidence of intraoperative monitoring efficacy in selective dorsal rhizotomy. Childs Nerv Syst 27:14531458, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Funk JF, Haberl H: Monosegmental laminoplasty for selective dorsal rhizotomy—operative technique and influence on the development of scoliosis in ambulatory children with cerebral palsy. Childs Nerv Syst 32:819825, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Golan JD, Hall JA, O’Gorman G, Poulin C, Benaroch TE, Cantin MA, : Spinal deformities following selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 106 (6 Suppl):441449, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Gros C, Ouaknine G, Vlahovitch B, Frèrebeau P: [Selective posterior radicotomy in the neurosurgical treatment of pyramidal hypertension.] Neurochirurgie 13:505518, 1967 (French)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Hays RM, McLaughlin JF, Bjornson KF, Stephens K, Roberts TS, Price R: Electrophysiological monitoring during selective dorsal rhizotomy, and spasticity and GMFM performance. Dev Med Child Neurol 40:233238, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Hurvitz EA, Marciniak CM, Daunter AK, Haapala HJ, Stibb SM, McCormick SF, : Functional outcomes of childhood dorsal rhizotomy in adults and adolescents with cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:380388, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Lang FF, Deletis V, Cohen HW, Velasquez L, Abbott R: Inclusion of the S2 dorsal rootlets in functional posterior rhizotomy for spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Neurosurgery 34:847853, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Logigian EL, Shefner JM, Goumnerova L, Scott RM, Soriano SG, Madsen J: The critical importance of stimulus intensity in intraoperative monitoring for partial dorsal rhizotomy. Muscle Nerve 19:415422, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Logigian EL, Soriano SG, Herrmann DN, Madsen JR: Gentle dorsal root retraction and dissection can cause areflexia: implications for intraoperative monitoring during “selective” partial dorsal rhizotomy. Muscle Nerve 24:13521358, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    McLaughlin J, Bjornson K, Temkin N, Steinbok P, Wright V, Reiner A, : Selective dorsal rhizotomy: meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Dev Med Child Neurol 44:1725, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    McLaughlin JF, Bjornson KF, Astley SJ, Graubert C, Hays RM, Roberts TS, : Selective dorsal rhizotomy: efficacy and safety in an investigator-masked randomized clinical trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 40:220232, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Mittal S, Farmer JP, Poulin C, Silver K: Reliability of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring in selective posterior rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 95:6775, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    O’Brien DF, Park TS, Puglisi JA, Collins DR, Leuthardt EC: Effect of selective dorsal rhizotomy on need for orthopedic surgery for spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy: long-term outcome analysis in relation to age. J Neurosurg 101 (1 Suppl):5963, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Ou C, Kent S, Miller S, Steinbok P: Selective dorsal rhizotomy in children: comparison of outcomes after single-level versus multi-level laminectomy technique. Can J Neurosci Nurs 32:1724, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B: Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 39:214223, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Park TS, Gaffney PE, Kaufman BA, Molleston MC: Selective lumbosacral dorsal rhizotomy immediately caudal to the conus medullaris for cerebral palsy spasticity. Neurosurgery 33:929934, 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Park TS, Johnston JM: Surgical techniques of selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy. Technical note. Neurosurg Focus 21(2):e7, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Peacock WJ, Staudt LA: Spasticity in cerebral palsy and the selective posterior rhizotomy procedure. J Child Neurol 5:179185, 1990

  • 27

    Phillips LH, Park TS. Electrophysiologic studies of selective posterior rhizotomy patients, in Park TS, Phillips LH II, Peacock WJ (eds): Management of Spasticity in Cerebral Palsy and Spinal Cord Injury. Neurosurgery: State of the Art Reviews, Vol 4. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, 1989, pp 459469

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Pollack MA: Limited benefit of electrophysiological studies during dorsal rhizotomy. Muscle Nerve 17:553555, 1994

  • 29

    Privat JM, Benezech J, Frerebeau P, Gros C: Sectorial posterior rhizotomy, a new technique of surgical treatment for spasticity. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 35:181195, 1976

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Ravindra VM, Christensen MT, Onwuzulike K, Smith JT, Halvorson K, Brockmeyer DL, : Risk factors for progressive neuromuscular scoliosis requiring posterior spinal fusion after selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 20:456463, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Riegle EV, Gunter JB, Lagueruela RG, Park TS, Owen J: Anesthesia for selective dorsal rhizotomy in children. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 4:182187, 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Sacco DJ, Tylkowski CM, Warf BC: Nonselective partial dorsal rhizotomy: a clinical experience with 1-year follow-up. Pediatr Neurosurg 32:114118, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Steinbok P, Hicdonmez T, Sawatzky B, Beauchamp R, Wickenheiser D: Spinal deformities after selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg 102 (4 Suppl):363373, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Steinbok P, Kestle JR: Variation between centers in electrophysiologic techniques used in lumbosacral selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy. Pediatr Neurosurg 25:233239, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Steinbok P, Keyes R, Langill L, Cochrane DD: The validity of electrophysiological criteria used in selective functional posterior rhizotomy for treatment of spastic cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg 81:354361, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Steinbok P, Langill L, Cochrane DD, Keyes R: Observations on electrical stimulation of lumbosacral nerve roots in children with and without lower limb spasticity. Childs Nerv Syst 8:376382, 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Steinbok P, Reiner AM, Beauchamp R, Armstrong RW, Cochrane DD, Kestle J: A randomized clinical trial to compare selective posterior rhizotomy plus physiotherapy with physiotherapy alone in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 39:178184, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Steinbok P, Tidemann AJ, Miller S, Mortenson P, Bowen-Roberts T: Electrophysiologically guided versus non-electrophysiologically guided selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy: a comparison of outcomes. Childs Nerv Syst 25:10911096, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Storrs BB, Nishida T: Use of the ‘H’ reflex recovery curve in selective posterior rhizotomy. Pediatr Neurosci 14:120123, 1988

  • 40

    Summers J, Coker B, Eddy S, Elstad M, Bunce C, Bourmpaki E, : Selective dorsal rhizotomy in ambulant children with cerebral palsy: an observational cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 3:455462, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Turner RP: Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring during selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Clin Neurophysiol 26:8284, 2009

  • 42

    Warf BC, Nelson KR: The electromyographic responses to dorsal rootlet stimulation during partial dorsal rhizotomy are inconsistent. Pediatr Neurosurg 25:1319, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Weiss IP, Schiff SJ: Reflex variability in selective dorsal rhizotomy. J Neurosurg 79:346353, 1993

  • 44

    Wong AMK, Pei YC, Lui TN, Chen CL, Wang CM, Chung CY: Comparison between botulinum toxin type A injection and selective posterior rhizotomy in improving gait performance in children with cerebral palsy. J Neurosurg 102 (4 Suppl):385389, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Wright FV, Sheil EM, Drake JM, Wedge JH, Naumann S: Evaluation of selective dorsal rhizotomy for the reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol 40:239247, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 122 122 104
Full Text Views 56 56 52
PDF Downloads 109 109 98
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0