Craniopharyngioma in children: trends from a third consecutive single-center cohort study

Restricted access

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

OBJECTIVE

The management of children with craniopharyngioma has evolved over time, with a trend toward less invasive neurosurgical approaches as surgeons have sought to balance oncological control and treatment-related morbidity. To this end, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the current management of children with craniopharyngioma compared to the previous management methods used at the authors’ treatment center.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was searched over a 14-year period between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018, to identify all children 17 years of age or younger with a new diagnosis of craniopharyngioma. A retrospective case note review was performed for each child to extract data on the presentation, investigation, treatment, and outcome of their illness. Morbidity was assessed in the same fashion as in previous cohorts, according to the following categories: visual loss, pituitary dysfunction, hypothalamic dysfunction, neurological deficits, and cognitive impairment.

RESULTS

In total, 59 children were identified with craniopharyngioma during the study period. A total of 92 operations were performed, including cyst drainage (35/92; 38.0%), craniotomy and resection (30/92; 32.6%), and transsphenoidal resection (16/92; 17.4%). Approximately two-thirds of all operations were performed using image guidance (66/92; 71.7%) and one-third were performed using endoscopy (27/92; 29.3%). The majority of children had adjuvant therapy comprising proton beam therapy (18/59; 30.5%) or conventional radiotherapy (16/59; 27.1%). The median follow-up duration was 44 months (range 1–142 months), and approximately one-half of the children had no evidence of residual disease on MRI studies (28/59; 47.5%). Of the remaining 31 children, there was a reduction in the volume of residual disease in 8 patients (8/59; 13.6%), stable residual disease in 18 (18/59; 30.5%), and tumor growth in 5 patients (5/59; 8.5%). There was significantly reduced morbidity (p < 0.05) in all categories in the current cohort compared with our last cohort (1996–2004).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors’ institutional experience of pediatric craniopharyngioma confirms a trend toward less invasive neurosurgical procedures, most of which are now performed with the benefit of image guidance or endoscopy. Moreover, the authors have identified an expanding role for more targeted radiotherapy for children with residual disease. These advances have allowed for tumor control comparable to that achieved in previous cohorts, but with significantly reduced morbidity and mortality.

Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Hani J. Marcus: Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, London, United Kingdom. h.marcus@ucl.ac.uk.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online December 20, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.10.PEDS19147.Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Bishop AJGreenfield BMahajan APaulino ACOkcu MFAllen PK: Proton beam therapy versus conformal photon radiation therapy for childhood craniopharyngioma: multi-institutional analysis of outcomes, cyst dynamics, and toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90:3543612014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Cappabianca PCavallo LMEsposito FDe Divitiis OMessina ADe Divitiis E: Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 33:1511992008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Clark AJCage TAAranda DParsa ATAuguste KIGupta N: Treatment-related morbidity and the management of pediatric craniopharyngioma: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Pediatr 10:2933012012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    de Vile CJGrant DBHayward RDKendall BENeville BGStanhope R: Obesity in childhood craniopharyngioma: relation to post-operative hypothalamic damage shown by magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:273427371996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    De Vile CJGrant DBKendall BENeville BGStanhope RWatkins KE: Management of childhood craniopharyngioma: can the morbidity of radical surgery be predicted? J Neurosurg 85:73811996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Delitala ABrunori AChiappetta F: Purely neuroendoscopic transventricular management of cystic craniopharyngiomas. Childs Nerv Syst 20:8588622004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    DeVile CJGrant DBHayward RDStanhope R: Growth and endocrine sequelae of craniopharyngioma. Arch Dis Child 75:1081141996

  • 8

    Giordano MSamii ALawson McLean ACBertalanffy HFahlbusch RSamii M: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric neurosurgery: safety and utility. J Neurosurg Pediatr 19:77842017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hayhurst CWilliams DYousaf JRichardson DPizer BMallucci C: Skull base surgery for tumors in children: long-term clinical and functional outcome. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:4965032013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Hellwig DTirakotai WRiegel THeinze SBertalanffy H: Endoscopy in neurosurgery. Dtsch Arztebl 104:1851912007

  • 11

    Hofmann BMNimsky CFahlbusch R: Benefit of 1.5-T intraoperative MR imaging in the surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:137713902011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Jane JA JrPrevedello DMAlden TDLaws ER Jr: The transsphenoidal resection of pediatric craniopharyngiomas: a case series. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:49602010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Karavitaki NCudlip SAdams CBWass JA: Craniopharyngiomas. Endocr Rev 27:3713972006

  • 14

    Kim KYeon JYSeol HJShin HJ: Transventricular endoscopic biopsy of suprasellar tumors: a pediatric case series. Childs Nerv Syst 29:128512912013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Laffond CDellatolas GAlapetite CPuget SGrill JHabrand JL: Quality-of-life, mood and executive functioning after childhood craniopharyngioma treated with surgery and proton beam therapy. Brain Inj 26:2702812012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Leng LZGreenfield JPSouweidane MMAnand VKSchwartz TH: Endoscopic, endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas: analysis of outcome including extent of resection, cerebrospinal fluid leak, return to preoperative productivity, and body mass index. Neurosurgery 70:1101242012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Locatelli DMassimi LRigante MCustodi VPaludetti GCastelnuovo P: Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for sellar tumors in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74:129813022010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Louis DNPerry AReifenberger Gvon Deimling AFigarella-Branger DCavenee WK: The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:8038202016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Maciunas RJGalloway RL JrFitzpatrick JMMandava VREdwards CAAllen GS: A universal system for interactive image-directed neurosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 58:1081131992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Mallucci CPizer BBlair JDidi MDoss AUpadrasta S: Management of craniopharyngioma: the Liverpool experience following the introduction of the CCLG guidelines. Introducing a new risk assessment grading system. Childs Nerv Syst 28:118111922012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Marcus HJHughes-Hallett ACundy TPDi Marco APratt PNandi D: Comparative effectiveness of 3-dimensional vs 2-dimensional and high-definition vs standard-definition neuroendoscopy: a preclinical randomized crossover study. Neurosurgery 74:3753812014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Marcus HJHughes-Hallett AKwasnicki RMDarzi AYang GZNandi D: Technological innovation in neurosurgery: a quantitative study. J Neurosurg 123:1741812015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Marcus HJVercauteren TOurselin SDorward NL: Intraoperative ultrasound in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma: systematic review [corrected]. World Neurosurg 106:6806852017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Mortini PGagliardi FBailo MSpina AParlangeli AFalini A: Magnetic resonance imaging as predictor of functional outcome in craniopharyngiomas. Endocrine 51:1481622016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Müller HL: Childhood craniopharyngioma: treatment strategies and outcomes. Expert Rev Neurother 14:1871972014

  • 26

    Müller HL: Preoperative staging in childhood craniopharyngioma: standardization as a first step towards improved outcome. Endocrine 51:132016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Müller HLGebhardt UTeske CFaldum AZwiener IWarmuth-Metz M: Post-operative hypothalamic lesions and obesity in childhood craniopharyngioma: results of the multinational prospective trial KRANIOPHARYNGEOM 2000 after 3-year follow-up. Eur J Endocrinol 165:17242011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Puget SGarnett MWray AGrill JHabrand JLBodaert N: Pediatric craniopharyngiomas: classification and treatment according to the degree of hypothalamic involvement. J Neurosurg 106 (1 Suppl):3122007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Quadri SAWaqas MKhan IKhan MASuriya SSFarooqui M: High-intensity focused ultrasound: past, present, and future in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 44(2):E162018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Roberts DWStrohbehn JWHatch JFMurray WKettenberger H: A frameless stereotaxic integration of computerized tomographic imaging and the operating microscope. J Neurosurg 65:5455491986

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Sainte-Rose CPuget SWray AZerah MGrill JBrauner R: Craniopharyngioma: the pendulum of surgical management. Childs Nerv Syst 21:6916952005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Sanford RA: Craniopharyngioma: results of survey of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 21 (Suppl 1):39431994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Schoenfeld APekmezci MBarnes MJTihan TGupta NLamborn KR: The superiority of conservative resection and adjuvant radiation for craniopharyngiomas. J Neurooncol 108:1331392012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Steňo JBízik ISteňo AMatejčík V: Craniopharyngiomas in children: how radical should the surgeon be? Childs Nerv Syst 27:41542011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Stripp DCMaity AJanss AJBelasco JBTochner ZAGoldwein JW: Surgery with or without radiation therapy in the management of craniopharyngiomas in children and young adults. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:7147202004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Thompson DPhipps KHayward R: Craniopharyngioma in childhood: our evidence-based approach to management. Childs Nerv Syst 21:6606682005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Tritos NA: Is there a role for targeted medical therapies in patients with craniopharyngiomas? Future Oncol 11:322132232015

  • 38

    Van Gompel JJNippoldt TBHiggins DMMeyer FB: Magnetic resonance imaging-graded hypothalamic compression in surgically treated adult craniopharyngiomas determining postoperative obesity. Neurosurg Focus 28(4):E32010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    van Lindert EJIngels KMylanus EGrotenhuis JA: Variations of endonasal anatomy: relevance for the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152:101510202010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    von Elm EAltman DGEgger MPocock SJGøtzsche PCVandenbroucke JP: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:145314572007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Winkfield KMLinsenmeier CYock TIGrant PEYeap BYButler WE: Surveillance of craniopharyngioma cyst growth in children treated with proton radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:7167212009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 210 210 160
Full Text Views 53 53 27
PDF Downloads 68 68 48
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar