A comparison of costs associated with endoscope-assisted craniectomy versus open cranial vault repair for infants with sagittal synostosis

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

The surgical management of infants with sagittal synostosis has traditionally relied on open cranial vault remodeling (CVR) techniques; however, minimally invasive technologies, including endoscope-assisted craniectomy (EAC) repair followed by helmet therapy (HT, EAC+HT), is increasingly used to treat various forms of craniosynostosis during the 1st year of life. In this study the authors determined the costs associated with EAC+HT in comparison with those for CVR.

Methods

The authors performed a retrospective case-control analysis of 21 children who had undergone CVR and 21 who had undergone EAC+HT. Eligibility criteria included an age less than 1 year and at least 1 year of clinical follow-up data. Financial and clinical records were reviewed for data related to length of hospital stay and transfusion rates as well as costs associated with physician, hospital, and outpatient clinic visits.

Results

The average age of patients who underwent CVR was 6.8 months compared with 3.1 months for those who underwent EAC+HT. Patients who underwent EAC+HT most often required the use of 2 helmets (76.5%), infrequently required a third helmet (13.3%), and averaged 1.8 clinic visits in the first 90 days after surgery. Endoscope-assisted craniectomy plus HT was associated with shorter hospital stays (mean 1.10 vs 4.67 days for CVR, p < 0.0001), a decreased rate of blood transfusions (9.5% vs 100% for CVR, p < 0.0001), and a decreased operative time (81.1 vs 165.8 minutes for CVR, p < 0.0001). The overall cost of EAC+HT, accounting for hospital charges, professional and helmet fees, and clinic visits, was also lower than that of CVR ($37,255.99 vs $56,990.46, respectively, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Endoscope-assisted craniectomy plus HT is a less costly surgical option for patients than CVR. In addition, EAC+HT was associated with a lower utilization of perioperative resources. Theses findings suggest that EAC+HT for infants with sagittal synostosis may be a cost-effective first-line surgical option.

Abbreviations used in this paper:CVR = cranial vault remodeling; EAC = endoscope-assisted craniectomy; EBL = estimated blood loss; ECBV = estimated circulating blood volume; HT = helmet therapy.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Timothy W. Vogel, M.D., Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery & Department of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, University of Cincinnati, 3333 Burnet Ave., MLC 2016, Cincinnati, OH 45229. email: tim.vogel@cchmc.org.Please include this information when citing this paper: published online January 10, 2014; DOI: 10.3171/2013.12.PEDS13320.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Abbott MMRogers GFProctor MRBusa KMeara JG: Cost of treating sagittal synostosis in the first year of life. J Craniofac Surg 23:88932012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Cartwright CCJimenez DFBarone CMBaker L: Endoscopic strip craniectomy: a minimally invasive treatment for early correction of craniosynostosis. J Neurosci Nurs 35:1301382003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Cohen MM Jr: The new bone biology: pathologic, molecular, and clinical correlates. Am J Med Genet A 140:264627062006

  • 4

    Czerwinski MHopper RAGruss JFearon JA: Major morbidity and mortality rates in craniofacial surgery: an analysis of 8101 major procedures. Plastic Reconstruct Surg 126:1811862010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Enchev YOi S: Historical trends of neuroendoscopic surgical techniques in the treatment of hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Rev 31:2492622008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Fearon JASingh DJBeals SPYu JC: The diagnosis and treatment of single-sutural synostoses: are computed tomographic scans necessary?. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:132713312007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Gociman BMarengo JYing JKestle JRWSiddiqi F: Minimally invasive strip craniectomy for sagittal synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 23:8258282012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Heller JBHeller MMKnoll BGabbay JSDuncan CPersing JA: Intracranial volume and cephalic index outcomes for total calvarial reconstruction among nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1871952008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hentschel SSteinbok PCochrane DDKestle J: Reduction of transfusion rates in the surgical correction of sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg 97:5035092002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Inagaki TKyutoku SSeno TKawaguchi TYamahara TOshige H: The intracranial pressure of the patients with mild form of craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 23:145514592007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Jimenez DFBarone CM: Early treatment of anterior calvarial craniosynostosis using endoscopic-assisted minimally invasive techniques. Childs Nerv Syst 23:141114192007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Jimenez DFBarone CM: Endoscopic craniectomy for early surgical correction of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 88:77811998

  • 13

    Jimenez DFBarone CM: Endoscopic techniques for craniosynostosis. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 18:931072010

  • 14

    Jimenez DFBarone CMMcGee MECartwright CCBaker CL: Endoscopy-assisted wide-vertex craniectomy, barrel stave osteotomies, and postoperative helmet molding therapy in the management of sagittal suture craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 100:5 Suppl Pediatrics4074172004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Johnson JOJimenez DFBarone CM: Blood loss after endoscopic strip craniectomy for craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 12:602000. (Letter)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Justice CMYagnik GKim YPeter IJabs EWErazo M: A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis near BMP2 and within BBS9. Nat Genet 44:136013642012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Koizumi TKomuro YHashizume KYanai A: Cephalic index of Japanese children with normal brain development. J Craniofac Surg 21:143414372010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Krajewski KAshley RKPung NWald SLazareff JKawamoto HK: Successful blood conservation during craniosynostotic correction with dual therapy using procrit and cell saver. J Craniofac Surg 19:1011052008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Lee AVan Pelt AEKane AAPilgram TKGovier DPWoo AS: Comparison of perceptions and treatment practices between neurosurgeons and plastic surgeons for infants with deformational plagiocephaly. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:3683742010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Lee HQHutson JMWray ACLo PAChong DKHolmes AD: Analysis of morbidity and mortality in surgical management of craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 23:125612612012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Li KWNelson CSuk IJallo GI: Neuroendoscopy: past, present, and future. Neurosurg Focus 19:6E12005

  • 22

    Ridgway EBBerry-Candelario JGrondin RTRogers GFProctor MR: The management of sagittal synostosis using endoscopic suturectomy and postoperative helmet therapy. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:6206262011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Riley AAArakawa YWorley SDuncan BWFukamachi K: Circulating blood volumes: a review of measurement techniques and a meta-analysis in children. ASAIO J 56:2602642010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Selber JReid RRGershman BSonnad SSSutton LNWhitaker LA: Evolution of operative techniques for the treatment of single-suture metopic synostosis. Ann Plast Surg 59:6132007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Seruya MOh AKBoyajian MJPosnick JCMyseros JSYaun AL: Long-term outcomes of primary craniofacial reconstruction for craniosynostosis: a 12-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:239724062011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Shah MNKane AAPetersen JDWoo ASNaidoo SDSmyth MD: Endoscopically assisted versus open repair of sagittal craniosynostosis: the St. Louis Children's Hospital experience. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 8:1651702011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Shillito J JrMatson DD: Craniosynostosis: a review of 519 surgical patients. Pediatrics 41:8298531968

  • 28

    Smyth MDTenenbaum MJKaufman CBKane AA: The “clamshell” craniotomy technique in treating sagittal craniosynostosis in older children. J Neurosurg 105:4 Suppl2452512006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Taylor JAMaugans TA: Comparison of spring-mediated cranioplasty to minimally invasive strip craniectomy and barrel staving for early treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 22:122512292011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Thompson DNMalcolm GPJones BMHarkness WJHayward RD: Intracranial pressure in single-suture craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurosurg 22:2352401995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Vogel TWManjila SCohen AR: Cranial neuroendoscopy: novel applications and next frontiers. J Neurosurg Sci 55:2432572011

  • 32

    Vollmer DGJane JAPark TSPersing JA: Variants of sagittal synostosis: strategies for surgical correction. J Neurosurg 61:5575621984

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 50 50 23
Full Text Views 640 299 4
PDF Downloads 279 83 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar