Analysis of limited-sequence head computed tomography for children with shunted hydrocephalus: potential to reduce diagnostic radiation exposure

Laboratory investigation

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine;
  • | 2 Divisions of Pediatric Radiology and Pediatric Neuroradiology, and
  • | 3 Medical Imaging Physics, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science; and
  • | 4 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

Despite its diagnostic utility, head CT scanning imparts risks of radiation exposure. Children with shunt-treated hydrocephalus exhibit increased risks of radiation toxicity due to the higher vulnerability of developing, immature tissues and frequent scanning. Several methods have been used to achieve dose reduction, including modifications of CT scanner tube current and potential. This retrospective study explores the use of a newly defined limited sequence of axial head CT slices to evaluate children with shunted hydrocephalus and decrease radiation exposure from diagnostic CT scans.

Methods

Consistent sequences of 7 axial slices were extracted from previously performed standard head CT scans in children with shunted hydrocephalus. Chronologically distinct limited sequences of each patient were blindly, retrospectively reviewed by 2 pediatric neuroradiologists and 1 pediatric neurosurgeon. Limited-sequence CT evaluation focused on the adequacy of portraying the ventricular system, changes in ventricular size, and visualization of the proximal catheter. Reviewers assessed all original full series head CT scans at least 4 months later for comparison. Adequacy and accuracy of the limited-sequence CT compared with the gold standard head CT was investigated using descriptive statistics. Effective dose (ED) estimates of the limited-sequence and standard head CT scans were compared using descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney test.

Results

Two serial head CT scans from each of 50 patients (age range 0–17 years; mean age 5.5 years) were reviewed both in standard and limited-sequence forms. The limited-sequence CT adequately portrayed the ventricular system in all cases. The inaccuracy rate for assessing changes in ventricular size by majority assessment (2 of 3 reviewers evaluating inaccurately) was 3 (6%) of 50. In 1 case, the inaccurate assessment would not have altered clinical management, corresponding to a 2 (4%) of 50 clinically relevant inaccuracy rate. As compared with the gold standard complete head CT series, the limited-sequence CT exhibited high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (91%) for portraying changes in ventricular caliber. Additionally, the limited-sequence CT displayed the ventricular catheter in 91.7% of scans averaged across 3 observers. Among all scans reviewed, 97 pairs of standard head CT and complementary limited-sequence CT scans contained adequate dosing information to calculate the effective dose (ED). The ED50 of the limited-sequence CT (0.284 mSv) differed significantly from the ED50 of the standard head CT (4.27 mSv) (p < 0.0001). The limited-sequence CT reflected a median absolute reduction of 4.10 mSv and a mean percent reduction of 91.8% in ED compared with standard head CT.

Conclusions

Limited-sequence head CT scanning provided adequate and accurate diagnostic information in children with shunted hydrocephalus. Techniques including minimization of axial slice quantity and modification of CT scanner parameters can achieve significant dose reduction, maintaining a balance between diagnostic utility and patient safety.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

BEIR = Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation; CTDIvol = volume CT dose index; DLP = dose-length product; EAM = external auditory meatus; ED = effective dose; ED50 = median ED; LNT = linear no-threshold.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Edward S. Ahn, M.D., Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Phipps 560A, Baltimore, MD 21287. email: eahn4@jhmi.edu.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online September 20, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.PEDS1322.

  • 1

    Berrington de González A, & Darby S: Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363:345351, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Brenner D, , Elliston C, , Hall E, & Berdon W: Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289296, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Brenner DJ, & Hall EJ: Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:22772284, 2007

  • 4

    Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee: AAPM Report No. 96: The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT College Park, MD, American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2008. (http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt_96.pdf) [Accessed August 9, 2013]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Fazel R, , Krumholz HM, , Wang Y, , Ross JS, , Chen J, & Ting HH, et al. : Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 361:849857, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Gupta N, , Park J, , Solomon C, , Kranz DA, , Wrensch M, & Wu YW: Long-term outcomes in patients with treated childhood hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 106:5 Suppl 334339, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Holmedal LJ, , Friberg EG, , Børretzen I, , Olerud H, , Laegreid L, & Rosendahl K: Radiation doses to children with shunt-treated hydrocephalus. Pediatr Radiol 37:12091215, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kestle JR: Pediatric hydrocephalus: current management. Neurol Clin 21:883895, vii, 2003

  • 10

    King MA, , Kanal KM, , Relyea-Chew A, , Bittles M, , Vavilala MS, & Hollingworth W: Radiation exposure from pediatric head CT: a bi-institutional study. Pediatr Radiol 39:10591065, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Mahesh M: MDCT Physics: The Basics: Technology, Image Quality and Radiation Dose Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009

  • 12

    Mullins ME, , Lev MH, , Bove P, , O'Reilly CE, , Saini S, & Rhea JT, et al. : Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:533538, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Pauwels EK, & Bourguignon M: Cancer induction caused by radiation due to computed tomography: a critical note. Acta Radiol 52:767773, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Pearce MS, , Salotti JA, , Little MP, , McHugh K, , Lee C, & Kim KP, et al. : Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499505, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Royal HD: Effects of low level radiation—what's new?. Semin Nucl Med 38:392402, 2008

  • 16

    Rybka K, , Staniszewska AM, & Biegański T: Low-dose protocol for head CT in monitoring hydrocephalus in children. Med Sci Monit 13:Suppl 1 147151, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Sandberg DI: Endoscopic management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients: a review of indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Child Neurol 23:550560, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Smith-Bindman R, , Lipson J, , Marcus R, , Kim KP, , Mahesh M, & Gould R, et al. : Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:20782086, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Smyth MD, , Narayan P, , Tubbs RS, , Leonard JR, , Park TS, & Loukas M, et al. : Cumulative diagnostic radiation exposure in children with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 24:493497, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Tubiana M: Computed tomography and radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 358:850, 2008. (Letter)

  • 21

    Udayasankar UK, , Braithwaite K, , Arvaniti M, , Tudorascu D, , Small WC, & Little S, et al. : Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:802806, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 677 124 13
Full Text Views 118 10 2
PDF Downloads 156 5 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0