Analysis of limited-sequence head computed tomography for children with shunted hydrocephalus: potential to reduce diagnostic radiation exposure

Laboratory investigation

Restricted access

Object

Despite its diagnostic utility, head CT scanning imparts risks of radiation exposure. Children with shunt-treated hydrocephalus exhibit increased risks of radiation toxicity due to the higher vulnerability of developing, immature tissues and frequent scanning. Several methods have been used to achieve dose reduction, including modifications of CT scanner tube current and potential. This retrospective study explores the use of a newly defined limited sequence of axial head CT slices to evaluate children with shunted hydrocephalus and decrease radiation exposure from diagnostic CT scans.

Methods

Consistent sequences of 7 axial slices were extracted from previously performed standard head CT scans in children with shunted hydrocephalus. Chronologically distinct limited sequences of each patient were blindly, retrospectively reviewed by 2 pediatric neuroradiologists and 1 pediatric neurosurgeon. Limited-sequence CT evaluation focused on the adequacy of portraying the ventricular system, changes in ventricular size, and visualization of the proximal catheter. Reviewers assessed all original full series head CT scans at least 4 months later for comparison. Adequacy and accuracy of the limited-sequence CT compared with the gold standard head CT was investigated using descriptive statistics. Effective dose (ED) estimates of the limited-sequence and standard head CT scans were compared using descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney test.

Results

Two serial head CT scans from each of 50 patients (age range 0–17 years; mean age 5.5 years) were reviewed both in standard and limited-sequence forms. The limited-sequence CT adequately portrayed the ventricular system in all cases. The inaccuracy rate for assessing changes in ventricular size by majority assessment (2 of 3 reviewers evaluating inaccurately) was 3 (6%) of 50. In 1 case, the inaccurate assessment would not have altered clinical management, corresponding to a 2 (4%) of 50 clinically relevant inaccuracy rate. As compared with the gold standard complete head CT series, the limited-sequence CT exhibited high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (91%) for portraying changes in ventricular caliber. Additionally, the limited-sequence CT displayed the ventricular catheter in 91.7% of scans averaged across 3 observers. Among all scans reviewed, 97 pairs of standard head CT and complementary limited-sequence CT scans contained adequate dosing information to calculate the effective dose (ED). The ED50 of the limited-sequence CT (0.284 mSv) differed significantly from the ED50 of the standard head CT (4.27 mSv) (p < 0.0001). The limited-sequence CT reflected a median absolute reduction of 4.10 mSv and a mean percent reduction of 91.8% in ED compared with standard head CT.

Conclusions

Limited-sequence head CT scanning provided adequate and accurate diagnostic information in children with shunted hydrocephalus. Techniques including minimization of axial slice quantity and modification of CT scanner parameters can achieve significant dose reduction, maintaining a balance between diagnostic utility and patient safety.

Abbreviations used in this paper:BEIR = Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation; CTDIvol = volume CT dose index; DLP = dose-length product; EAM = external auditory meatus; ED = effective dose; ED50 = median ED; LNT = linear no-threshold.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Edward S. Ahn, M.D., Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Phipps 560A, Baltimore, MD 21287. email: eahn4@jhmi.edu.Please include this information when citing this paper: published online September 20, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.PEDS1322.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Berrington de González ADarby S: Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363:3453512004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Brenner DElliston CHall EBerdon W: Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:2892962001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Brenner DJHall EJ: Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:227722842007

  • 4

    Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 Washington, DCNational Academies Press2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee: AAPM Report No. 96: The Measurement Reporting and Management of Radiation Dose in CT College Park, MDAmerican Association of Physicists in Medicine2008. (http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt_96.pdf) [Accessed August 9 2013]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Fazel RKrumholz HMWang YRoss JSChen JTing HH: Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 361:8498572009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Gupta NPark JSolomon CKranz DAWrensch MWu YW: Long-term outcomes in patients with treated childhood hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 106:5 Suppl3343392007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Holmedal LJFriberg EGBørretzen IOlerud HLaegreid LRosendahl K: Radiation doses to children with shunt-treated hydrocephalus. Pediatr Radiol 37:120912152007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kestle JR: Pediatric hydrocephalus: current management. Neurol Clin 21:883895vii2003

  • 10

    King MAKanal KMRelyea-Chew ABittles MVavilala MSHollingworth W: Radiation exposure from pediatric head CT: a bi-institutional study. Pediatr Radiol 39:105910652009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Mahesh M: MDCT Physics: The Basics: Technology Image Quality and Radiation Dose PhiladelphiaLippincott Williams & Wilkins2009

  • 12

    Mullins MELev MHBove PO'Reilly CESaini SRhea JT: Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:5335382004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Pauwels EKBourguignon M: Cancer induction caused by radiation due to computed tomography: a critical note. Acta Radiol 52:7677732011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Pearce MSSalotti JALittle MPMcHugh KLee CKim KP: Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:4995052012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Royal HD: Effects of low level radiation—what's new?. Semin Nucl Med 38:3924022008

  • 16

    Rybka KStaniszewska AMBiegański T: Low-dose protocol for head CT in monitoring hydrocephalus in children. Med Sci Monit 13:Suppl 11471512007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Sandberg DI: Endoscopic management of hydrocephalus in pediatric patients: a review of indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Child Neurol 23:5505602008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Smith-Bindman RLipson JMarcus RKim KPMahesh MGould R: Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169:207820862009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Smyth MDNarayan PTubbs RSLeonard JRPark TSLoukas M: Cumulative diagnostic radiation exposure in children with ventriculoperitoneal shunts: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 24:4934972008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Tubiana M: Computed tomography and radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 358:8502008. (Letter)

  • 21

    Udayasankar UKBraithwaite KArvaniti MTudorascu DSmall WCLittle S: Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:8028062008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 462 375 28
Full Text Views 105 6 0
PDF Downloads 147 3 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar