Perceived benefits and barriers to a career in pediatric neurosurgery: a survey of neurosurgical residents

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Research suggests that there may be a growing disparity between the supply of and demand for both pediatric specialists and neurosurgeons. Whether pediatric neurosurgeons are facing such a disparity is disputable, but interest in pediatric neurosurgery (PNS) has waxed and waned as evidenced by the number of applicants for PNS fellowships. The authors undertook a survey to analyze current neurosurgical residents' perceptions of both benefits and deterrents to a pediatric neurosurgical career.

Methods

All residents and PNS fellows in the United States and Canada during the academic year 2008–2009 were invited to complete a Web-based survey that assessed 1) demographic and educational information about residents and their residency training, particularly as it related to training in PNS; 2) residents' exposure to mentoring opportunities from pediatric neurosurgical faculty and their plans for the future; and 3) residents' perceptions about how likely 40 various factors were to influence their decision about whether to pursue a PNS career.

Results

Four hundred ninety-six responses were obtained: 89% of the respondents were male, 63% were married, 75% were in at least their 3rd year of postgraduate training, 61% trained in a children's hospital and 29% in a children's “hospital within a hospital,” and 72% were in programs having one or more dedicated PNS faculty members. The residencies of 56% of respondents offered 6–11 months of PNS training and nearly three-quarters of respondents had completed 2 months of PNS training. During medical school, 92% had been exposed to neurosurgery and 45% to PNS during a clinical rotation, but only 7% identified a PNS mentor. Nearly half (43%) are considering a PNS career, and of these, 61% are definitely or probably considering post-residency fellowship. On the other hand, 68% would prefer an enfolded fellowship during residency. Perceived strengths of PNS included working with children, developing lasting relationships, wider variety of operations, fast healing and lack of comorbidities, and altruism. Perceived significant deterrents included shunts, lower reimbursement, cross-coverage issues, higher malpractice premiums and greater legal exposure, and working with parents and pediatric health professionals. The intrinsic nature of PNS was listed as the most significant deterrent (46%) followed by financial concerns (25%), additional training (12%), longer work hours (12%), and medicolegal issues (4%). The majority felt that fellowship training and PNS certification should be recommended for surgeons treating of all but traumatic brain injuries and Chiari I malformations and performing simple shunt-related procedures, although they felt that these credentials should be required only for treating complex craniosynostosis.

Conclusions

The nature of PNS is the most significant barrier to attracting residents, although reimbursement, cross-coverage, and legal issues are also important to residents. The authors provide several recommendations that might enhance resident perceptions of PNS and attract trainees to the specialty.

Abbreviations used in this paper:AAP = American Academy of Pediatrics; ABNS = American Board of Neurological Surgery; ABPNS = American Board of Pediatric Neurological Surgery; ACPNF = Accreditation Council for Pediatric Neurosurgical Fellowships; ASPN = American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons; CAST = Committee on Accreditation of Subspecialty Training; PGY = postgraduate training year; PNS = pediatric neurosurgery.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Mark S. Dias, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, EC 2750, 30 Hope Dr., Hershey, PA 17033. email: mdias@hmc.psu.edu.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online August 30, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.7.PEDS12597.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

References

1

Albright ALSposto RHolmes EZeltzer PMFinlay JLWisoff JH: Correlation of neurosurgical subspecialization with outcomes in children with malignant brain tumors. Neurosurgery 47:8798872000

2

Althouse LAStritter FTSteiner BD: Attitudes and approaches of influential role models in clinical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 4:1111221999

3

Benzil DLvon der Schmidt E III: Toward harnessing forces of change: assessing the neurosurgical workforce. AANS Bulletin 15:7112006

4

Boop FASeaver MJ: Emergency care for kids: can neurosurgery do even better?. AANS Bulletin 16:7122007

5

Chen HHardacre JMMartin CLillemoe KD: Do medical school surgical rotations influence subspecialty choice?. J Surg Res 97:1721782001

6

Dohn H: Choices of careers in medicine: some theoretical and methodological issues. Med Educ 30:1571601996

7

Durham SRLane JRShipman SA: The pediatric neurosurgical workforce: defining the current supply. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:1102009

8

Durham SRShipman SA: A 15-year review of pediatric neurosurgical fellowships: implications for the pediatric neurosurgical workforce. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1:4294322008

9

Elam C: Application of Holland's theory of vocational personalities and work environments to medical student specialty selection. J Career Dev 21:37481994

10

Ernst RLYett DE: Physicians' background characteristics and their career choices: a review of the literature. Med Care Rev 41:1361984

11

Flannery AM: Pediatric neurosurgery work force: a pilot study. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:1141161998

12

Gottfried ONRovit RLPopp AJKraus KLSimon ASCouldwell WT: Neurosurgical workforce trends in the United States. J Neurosurg 102:2022082005

13

Kaufman BATerbrock AWinters NIto JKlosterman APark TS: Disbanding a multidisciplinary clinic: effects on the health care of myelomeningocele patients. Pediatr Neurosurg 21:36441994

14

Kozar RALucci AMiller CCAzizzadeh ACocanour CSPotts JR: Brief intervention by surgeons can influence students toward a career in surgery. J Surg Res 111:1661692003

15

Mayer ML: Are we there yet? Distance to care and relative supply among pediatric medical subspecialties. Pediatrics 118:231323212006

16

Mitchell WD: Medical student career choice: a conceptualization. Soc Sci Med 9:6416531975

17

Musunuru SLewis BRikkers LFChen H: Effective surgical residents strongly influence medical students to pursue surgical careers. J Am Coll Surg 204:1641672007

18

O'Herrin JKLewis BJRikkers LFChen H: Medical student operative experience correlates with a match to a categorical surgical program. Am J Surg 186:1251282003

19

O'Herrin JKLewis BJRikkers LFChen H: Why do students choose careers in surgery?. J Surg Res 119:1241292004

20

O'Neill JA Jr: Workforce issues in pediatric surgery. Bull Am Coll Surg 81:34371996

21

O'Neill JA JrGautam SGeiger JDEin SHHolder TMBloss RS: A longitudinal analysis of the pediatric surgeon workforce. Ann Surg 232:4424532000

22

Osipow SHFitzgerald LF: Theories of Career Development ed 4Needham Heights, MAAllyn and Bacon1996

23

Smith ERButler WEBarker FG II: Craniotomy for resection of pediatric brain tumors in the United States, 1988 to 2000: effects of provider caseloads and progressive centralization and specialization of care. Neurosurgery 54:5535652004

24

Stoddard JJCull WLJewett EABBrotherton SEMulvey HJAlden ER: Providing pediatric subspecialty care: a workforce analysis. Pediatrics 106:132513332000

TrendMD

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 76 76 17
Full Text Views 50 50 4
PDF Downloads 131 131 9
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar