Outcomes of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in the pediatric population

A systematic review

Restricted access

Cranioplasty is routinely performed following decompressive craniectomy in both adult and pediatric populations. In adults, this procedure is associated with higher rates of complications than is elective cranial surgery. This study is a review of the literature describing risk factors for complications after cranioplasty surgery in pediatric patients. A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, and SCOPUS databases was undertaken. Articles were selected based on their titles and abstracts. Only studies that focused on a pediatric population were included; case reports were excluded. Studies in which the authors assessed bone flap storage method, timing of cranioplasty, material used (synthetic vs autogenous), skull defect size, and/or complication rates (bone resorption and surgical site infection) were selected for further analysis. Eleven studies that included a total of 441 cranioplasties performed in the pediatric population are included in this review.

The findings are as follows: 1) Based on analysis of pooled data, using cryopreserved bone flaps during cranioplasty may lead to a higher rate of bone resorption and lower rate of infection than using bone flaps stored at room temperature. 2) In 3 of 4 articles describing the effect of time between craniectomy and cranioplasty on complication rate, the authors found no significant effect, while in 1 the authors found that the incidence of bone resorption was significantly lower in children who had undergone early cranioplasty. Pooling of data was not possible for this analysis. 3) There are insufficient data to assess the effect of cranioplasty material on complication rate when considering only cranioplasties performed to repair decompressive craniectomy defects. However, when considering cranioplasties performed for any indication, those in which freshly harvested autograft is used may have a lower rate of resorption than those in which stored autograft is used. 4) There is no appreciable effect of craniectomy defect size or patient age on complication rate.

There is a paucity of articles describing outcomes and complications following cranioplasty in children and adolescents. However, based on the studies examined in this systematic review, there are reasons to suspect that method of flap preservation, timing of surgery, and material used may be significant. Larger prospective and retrospective studies are needed to shed more light on this important issue.

Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Sandi Lam, M.D., M.B.A., 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 3026, J341, Chicago, IL 60637. email: slam@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.Please include this information when citing this paper: published online June 21, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.4.PEDS12605.

© Copyright 1944-2019 American Association of Neurological Surgeons

Headings
References
  • 1

    Açikgöz BOzcan OEErbengi ABertan VRuacan SAçikgöz HG: Histopathologic and microdensitometric analysis of craniotomy bone flaps preserved between abdominal fat and muscle. Surg Neurol 26:5575611986

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Blair GAGordon DSSimpson DA: Cranioplasty in children. Childs Brain 6:82911980

  • 3

    Blum KSSchneider SJRosenthal AD: Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty in children: long-term results. Pediatr Neurosurg 26:33351997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Bowers CARiva-Cambrin JHertzler DA IIWalker ML: Risk factors and rates of bone flap resorption in pediatric patients after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:5265322013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Chang VHartzfeld PLanglois MMahmood ASeyfried D: Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 112:112011242010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Frassanito PMassimi LCaldarelli MTamburrini GDi Rocco C: Complications of delayed cranial repair after decompressive craniectomy in children less than 1 year old. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:9279332012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Gooch MRGin GEKenning TJGerman JW: Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Focus 26:6E92009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Grant GAJolley MEllenbogen RGRoberts TSGruss JRLoeser JD: Failure of autologous bone-assisted cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg 100:2 Suppl Pediatrics1631682004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Gruber RPeter RHora J: The prognosis of cranioplasty following large craniectomy in children. Z Kinderchir 43:3753831988

  • 10

    Inamasu JKuramae TNakatsukasa M: Does difference in the storage method of bone flaps after decompressive craniectomy affect the incidence of surgical site infection after cranioplasty? Comparison between subcutaneous pocket and cryopreservation. J Trauma 68:1831872010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Jho DHNeckrysh SHardman JCharbel FTAmin-Hanjani S: Ethylene oxide gas sterilization: a simple technique for storing explanted skull bone. Technical note. J Neurosurg 107:4404452007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Josan VASgouros SWalsh ARDover MSNishikawa HHockley AD: Cranioplasty in children. Childs Nerv Syst 21:2002042005

  • 13

    Matsuno ATanaka HIwamuro HTakanashi SMiyawaki SNakashima M: Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:5355402006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Piedra MPThompson EMSelden NRRagel BTGuillaume DJ: Optimal timing of autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy in children. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 10:2682722012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Pochon JPKlöti J: Cranioplasty for acquired skull defects in children—a comparison between autologous material and methylmethacrylate 1974–1990. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1:1992011991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Posnick JCGoldstein JAArmstrong DRutka JT: Reconstruction of skull defects in children and adolescents by the use of fixed cranial bone grafts: long-term results. Neurosurgery 32:7857911993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Schuss PVatter HMarquardt GImöhl LUlrich CTSeifert V: Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: the effect of timing on postoperative complications. J Neurotrauma 29:109010952012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Taggard DAMenezes AH: Successful use of rib grafts for cranioplasty in children. Pediatr Neurosurg 34:1491552001

  • 19

    Winkler PAStummer WLinke RKrishnan KGTatsch K: Influence of cranioplasty on postural blood flow regulation, cerebrovascular reserve capacity, and cerebral glucose metabolism. J Neurosurg 93:53612000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Yadla SCampbell PGChitale RMaltenfort MGJabbour PSharan AD: Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections: a systematic review. Neurosurgery 68:112411302011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Yano HTanaka KMatsuo TTsuda MAkita SHirano A: Cranioplasty with auto-purified bone flap after infection. J Craniofac Surg 17:107610792006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 513 501 103
Full Text Views 194 142 4
PDF Downloads 208 114 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar