Safety and diagnostic accuracy of neuroendoscopic biopsies: an international multicenter study

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Analysis of the safety and morbidity of neuroendoscopic biopsies (NEBs), as well as the reliability in obtaining an accurate diagnosis, has until now been based on studies with relatively small sample sizes. Through the cooperative efforts of several international medical centers, authors of the present study collected data on a large number of patients to obtain better insight into this issue. When possible, they compared pathology obtained through an NEB with the “gold-standard” pathology obtained in open surgery.

Methods

Thirteen randomly chosen medical centers in 9 countries collected data for patients who had undergone NEB, which were then analyzed for universal complications, bleeding, navigation technique, pathology, mismatch between biopsy results and final diagnosis, and a number of other potentially influential factors.

Results

Data for 293 patients were analyzed. Sixty percent of the patients were male, and patient ages ranged from 0.1 to 78.7 years (median age 20.4 years). The most common tumor locations were pineal (33.1%), thalamic (16.7%), tectal (13%), and hypothalamic (4.4%). Fifty percent of the tumors were larger than 20 mm, 36% were between 10 and 20 mm, and 14% were smaller than 10 mm. Intraoperative bleeding was seen in 275 patients (94%). The amount of blood was noted as mild in 75%, moderate in 13%, and severe in 6%. Infection occurred in 8 patients (3%). Death occurred in 1 patient (0.3%), which was caused by severe intraoperative bleeding. Biopsies were informative in 265 patients (90.4%). Seventy-eight patients (26.6%) had open surgery following the NEB. For these patients, the pathology results from the NEB were compared with those from the open surgery that followed. In 14 cases (17.9%) there was disagreement on the pathology. Of these cases, a meaningful mismatch, in which the erroneous NEB pathology could have led to an inappropriate management decision, occurred in 9 cases (11.5%). Most of these meaningful mismatches were lesions diagnosed as low-grade or pilocytic astrocytoma on the NEB and later proved to be high-grade astrocytoma (4 cases) and 1 case each of meningioma, cavernoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumor, neurocysticercosis, and pineocytoma.

Conclusions

In experienced hands, NEBs can be performed with low morbidity and mortality, providing meaningful pathological data for the majority of patients with a wide range of tumor types, locations, and presentations. These biopsies also offer other advantages, such as the ability to perform concomitant endoscopic third ventriculostomy and septum pellucidotomy. However, due caution must be maintained, since pathology obtained from an NEB, as with stereotactic biopsies, may be subject to sampling errors, especially when the results seem to indicate a low-grade glial tumor.

Abbreviations used in this paper:NEB = neuroendoscopic biopsy; SNB = stereotactic needle biopsy.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Shlomi Constantini, M.D., M.Sc., Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Dana Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, 6 Weizman Street, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel. email: sconsts@netvision.net.il.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online April 12, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.3.PEDS12416.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

References

  • 1

    Ahmad FSandberg DI: Endoscopic management of intraventricular brain tumors in pediatric patients: a review of indications, techniques, and outcomes. J Child Neurol 25:3593672010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Ahn ESGoumnerova L: Endoscopic biopsy of brain tumors in children: diagnostic success and utility in guiding treatment strategies. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:2552622010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Al-Tamimi YZBhargava DSurash SRamirez RENovegno FCrimmins DW: Endoscopic biopsy during third ventriculostomy in paediatric pineal region tumours. Childs Nerv Syst 24:132313262008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Chernov MFKamikawa SYamane FIshihara SKubo OHori T: Neurofiberscopic biopsy of tumors of the pineal region and posterior third ventricle: indications, technique, complications, and results. Neurosurgery 59:2672772006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Depreitere BDasi NRutka JDirks PDrake J: Endoscopic biopsy for intraventricular tumors in children. J Neurosurg 106:5 Suppl3403462007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Hall WA: The safety and efficacy of stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions. Cancer 82:174917551998

  • 7

    Jackson RJFuller GNAbi-Said DLang FFGokaslan ZLShi WM: Limitations of stereotactic biopsy in the initial management of gliomas. Neuro Oncol 3:1932002001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Kim JEKim DGPaek SHJung HW: Stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions: reliability and its impact on the planning of treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145:5475552003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kinfe TMCapelle HHMirzayan MJBoschert JWeigel RKrauss JK: Stereotactic versus endoscopic surgery in periventricular lesions. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:5175262011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kongkham PNKnifed ETamber MSBernstein M: Complications in 622 cases of frame-based stereotactic biopsy, a decreasing procedure. Can J Neurol Sci 35:79842008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Meyer MKeith-Rokosh JReddy HMegyesi JHammond RR: Sources of error in neuropathology intraoperative diagnosis. Can J Neurol Sci 37:6206242010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Naftel RPShannon CNReed GTMartin RBlount JPTubbs RS: Small-ventricle neuroendoscopy for pediatric brain tumor management. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:1041102011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Parreño MGBo XKanu OOConstantini SKanner AA: Frameless stereotactic procedures in pediatric patients: safety and diagnostic efficacy. Childs Nerv Syst 27:213721402011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Sawin PDHitchon PWFollett KATorner JC: Computed imaging-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: a risk analysis of 225 consecutive cases. Surg Neurol 49:6406491998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Shono TNatori YMorioka TTorisu RMizoguchi MNagata S: Results of a long-term follow-up after neuroendoscopic biopsy procedure and third ventriculostomy in patients with intracranial germinomas. J Neurosurg 3 Suppl107:1931982007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Song JHKong DSShin HJ: Feasibility of neuroendoscopic biopsy of pediatric brain tumors. Childs Nerv Syst 26:159315982010

  • 17

    Tirakotai WHellwig DBertalanffy HRiegel T: The role of neuroendoscopy in the management of solid or solid-cystic intra- and periventricular tumours. Childs Nerv Syst 23:6536582007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Woodworth GFMcGirt MJSamdani AGaronzik IOlivi AWeingart JD: Frameless image-guided stereotactic brain biopsy procedure: diagnostic yield, surgical morbidity, and comparison with the frame-based technique. J Neurosurg 104:2332372006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Yurtseven TErşahin YDemirtaş EMutluer S: Neuroendoscopic biopsy for intraventricular tumors. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 46:2932992003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

TrendMD

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 205 205 84
Full Text Views 84 84 1
PDF Downloads 64 64 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar