Dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) is an uncommon vascular entity that consists of direct pathological connections between meningeal arteries and dural venous sinuses or leptomeningeal veins. DAVFs represent 10% to 15% of all intracranial vascular malformations.1 The etiology of DAVFs is still uncertain, but they are reportedly associated with venous sinus thrombosis, trauma, and previous craniotomy, among other factors.2–4 Here, we present a case of sigmoid sinus (SS) DAVF that developed secondary to SS thrombosis after resection of a foramen magnum meningioma as well as a review of the relevant literature.
Illustrative Case
A 63-year-old woman presented with clumsiness and numbness of both upper limbs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a foramen magnum meningioma (Fig. 1A). Preoperative cerebral angiography showed that the occipital artery (OA) and ascending pharyngeal artery (APA) were the arterial feeders (Fig. 1B and C). The presence of stenosis of the SS or intracranial vascular malformations was not confirmed (Fig. 1D). Considering that the meningioma was symptomatic, we performed a tumor resection via a right suboccipital craniotomy. Gross-total resection (resection extent: Simpson grade II) was achieved, and the histopathological diagnosis was meningothelial meningioma (World Health Organization grade 1). During craniotomy, bleeding from the SS was encountered, and hemostasis was achieved by compression. Although the patient recovered well without any new neurological deficits, contrast-enhanced MRI demonstrated occlusion (Fig. 2A) of the right SS and thrombosis (Fig. 2B) on postoperative day 1. Because this lesion was asymptomatic, the patient was managed conservatively without the use of heparin. No intracranial vascular malformations had been detected at this point. At 47 months postoperatively, MR angiography (MRA) incidentally showed the right transverse sinus and SS, which were not visualized immediately after surgery, and increased abnormal blood vessel growth (Fig. 2C and D). Cerebral angiography at 49 months postoperatively revealed the development of an SS DAVF with occlusion of the right SS (Fig. 3). The feeders were the OA and APA (Fig. 3B). To examine the relationship of the DAVF to the previously detected sinus thrombus, fusion three-dimensional computer graphics (3DCG) images were reconstructed using GRID 1.1 software (Kompath Inc.). This application provides automatic image registration of multiple imaging studies by normalized mutual information.5 By integrating MRI and digital subtraction angiography, we found that the dilated feeder with neovascularization connected to the right SS along the previous thrombus site (Fig. 4C and D). A branch of the APA flowed into the SS at the site of the distal end of the previous thrombus, acting as the main feeder to the DAVF (Fig. 4). Because the DAVF was asymptomatic with no cortical venous reflux (CVR; i.e., Borden type I6 and Cognard type IIa7), the patient was managed conservatively with regular MRI follow-up. The angioarchitecture of the DAVF remained unchanged 27 months after its diagnosis.
Preoperative imaging. A: Sagittal gadolinium-enhanced MRI before tumor resection. An extraaxial tumor with enhancement on the foramen magnum was detected (blue arrow). B: Anteroposterior view of digital subtraction angiography of the right common carotid artery before surgery. The right APA (blue arrow) was feeding the tumor. C: Lateral view of digital subtraction angiography of the right common carotid artery before surgery. The right OA (blue arrow) was feeding the tumor. D: Anteroposterior view of digital subtraction angiography of the right common carotid artery before surgery. No obvious vascular malformations or stenosis of the sigmoid sinus was detected.
Postoperative imaging. A: Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR venography on postoperative day 1. The right SS (blue arrow) was occluded. B: Axial gadolinium-enhanced MRI on postoperative day 1. Thrombus (blue arrow) was identified in the right sigmoid sinus. C: Three-dimensional time-of-flight MRA on postoperative day 1. No obvious vascular abnormalities had been observed before surgery. D: Three-dimensional time-of-flight MRA at 47 months postoperatively. The right transverse sinus–SS and dilated abnormal arteries are visualized.
Digital subtraction angiography of the dural arteriovenous fistula. A: Anteroposterior view of digital subtraction angiography of the right external carotid artery at 49 months postoperatively. A right SS DAVF with occlusion of the right SS was detected. B: Lateral view of digital subtraction angiography of the right external carotid artery at 49 months postoperatively. Microfeeders with neovascularization from the right APA (blue arrow) and the right dilated OA (blue arrowhead) were detected. C: Anteroposterior view of digital subtraction angiography of the right internal carotid artery at 49 months postoperatively. No vascular abnormalities were observed.
Elucidation of the detailed architecture of the DAVF by fusion 3DCG. A: Fusion 3DCG before surgery. The positional relationship between the tumor (purple), SS (blue), and artery (red) is visualized. B: Fusion 3DCG on postoperative day 1. The thrombus (green) was manually reconstructed from loss of contrast in the sinus from T1-weighted MRI with contrast. Only the superior segment of the thrombus was at the superior corner of the craniotomy. C: Fusion 3DCG of the DAVF. The positional relationship among the SS, the artery, and craniotomy was revealed. The right dilated OA with neovascularization and partial recanalization of the right SS was observed. There were no obvious feeders passing through the site of craniotomy. D: Posterior view of fusion 3DCG without the skull bone. The main feeder was the right APA (blue arrows), which connected to the right SS at the distal point of the previous thrombus.
Discussion
Observations
This is a unique report of a case in which we used 3DCG to demonstrate the chronological development of a DAVF after craniotomy for meningioma resection. The detailed architecture of a DAVF that developed secondary to postoperative sinus thrombosis could be clearly visualized by fusion 3DCG, integrating MRI and digital subtraction angiography. Through analysis of the fusion 3DCG images, we could infer the putative mechanism by which the DAVF developed after venous thrombosis.
DAVF after craniotomy is relatively rare, with few cases having been reported secondary to sinus thrombosis. In our literature review (Table 1), we found 25 cases of DAVF developing after craniotomy;8–26 23 were directly related to the site of craniotomy and 2 appeared at different sites. There were 14 cases that developed after suboccipital craniotomy, 10 that represented postoperative stenosis or occlusion of the SS, and 2 that reflected postoperative thrombosis of the SS on imaging findings. The postoperative thrombosis of SS was detected 49 and 6 months later,14 respectively. The median period to diagnosis of these DAVFs was 12 months (range, 4–240), and in those developing after suboccipital craniotomy, it was 24 months (range, 4–60). Postcraniotomy DAVF tends to develop slowly in patients with SS stenosis or occlusion after suboccipital craniotomy and generally appears at the site of craniotomy. These findings suggest that long-term surveillance for possible DAVFs may be necessary, especially in cases of SS stenosis or occlusion after suboccipital craniotomy.
Clinical characteristics of dural arteriovenous fistulas reported after craniotomy
Authors & Year | Age (yrs), Sex | Primary Pathology | Surgical Procedure | Sinus Stenosis/Occlusion | Postoperative Sinus Thrombosis | Interval for DAVF Dev (mos postop) | Location of DAVF | Symptoms of DAVF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nabors et al., 19878 | 70, F | Rt trigeminal neuralgia | Rt SOC | NM | NM | 4 | Rt SS | Bruit |
60, M | Lt hemifacial spasm | Lt SOC | NM | NM | 24 | Lt SS | Bruit, tinnitus | |
Sasaki et al., 19959 | 58, M | Rt trigeminal neuroma | Rt transpetrosal & transtentorial approach | Postoperative rt SS occlusion | Yes (rt SS) | 23 | Rt TS-SS | Bruit, dementia, gait disturbance |
Kim et al., 201410 | 49, M | Lt hemifacial spasm | Lt SOC | NM | NM | 10 | Lt TS-SS | ICH |
Yokoyama et al., 201911 | 63, F | Lt CPA meningioma | Lt SOC | Postoperative lt SS occlusion | NM | 6 | Lt TS-SS | Bruit |
56, F | Rt CPA epidermoid tumor | Rt SOC & transpetrosal approach | Postoperative rt SS occlusion | NM | 24 | Rt TS-SS | Bruit | |
Sakaki et al., 199612 | 59, F | Lt retromastoid meningioma | Lt SOC | Preoperative lt SS occlusion | NM | 42 | Lt TS-SS | ICH |
65, M | Rt jugular tubercle meningioma | Rt SOC | Rt SS was resected | NM | 60 | Rt TS-SS | HA, vomit, vertigo | |
56, M | Rt hypoglossal neurinoma | Rt SOC | Preoperative rt SS occlusion | NM | 54 | Rt TS-SS | Cerebellar infarction | |
31, F | Lt glomus jugulare tumor | Lt SOC | Lt SS was resected | NM | 28 | Lt TS-SS | Tinnitus | |
Xue et al., 201913 | 50, F | Petroclival meningioma | Rt SOC | Postoperative rt SS stenosis | NM | 24 | Rt TS-SS | Tinnitus, audible behind |
Yassari et al., 200214 | 24, F | Pilocytic astrocytoma | Midline SOC | Postoperative lt SS occlusion | Yes (lt SS) | 11 | Lt TS-SS | Bruit, tinnitus |
Higashida et al., 201515 | 64, F | Cerebrospinal fluid otorrhea | Rt SOC | Postoperative rt SS occlusion | NM | 48 | Rt TS-SS | Tinnitus, dementia, gait disturbance |
Sadahiro et al., 201416 | 37, F | Brain stem cavernous hemangioma | Midline SOC | NM | NM | 9 | Lt inferior vermian vein | NM |
Dudeck et al., 200417 | 16, M | Rt cerebellar DVA | Rt SOC | NM | NM | 9 | Rt TS-SS | Tinnitus, HA, blurred vision |
Pabaney et al., 201618 | 62, M | Epilepsy | Rt temporal craniotomy | NM | NM | 240 | Previous craniotomy site | SAH |
Davie et al., 196719 | 47, F | Lt sphenoid wing meningioma | Lt frontotemporal craniotomy | NM | NM | 90 | Previous craniotomy site | HA, loss of vision, proptosis |
Peeters et al., 202020 | NM | Moyamoya disease | Rt STA-MCA bypass | NM | NM | 8 | Previous craniotomy site | NM |
Ugrinovski et al., 198921 | 46, F | Rt falx meningioma | Rt parietal craniotomy | NM | NM | 6 | Far from previous craniotomy site | Bruit, tinnitus |
Watanabe et al., 198422 | 59, F | Rt IC-PC AN | Rt frontotemporal craniotomy | NM | NM | 4 | Cavernous sinus | Tinnitus |
57, F | Craniopharyngioma | Rt frontoparietotemporal craniotomy | NM | NM | 10 | Lt TS-SS | Bruit, tinnitus | |
Ding et al., 201623 | 26, M | Rt ruptured AVM | NM | NM | NM | 5 | Previous craniotomy site | NM |
Ahn et al., 200224 | 69, M | Lt ruptured AVM | Lt temporal craniotomy | NM | NM | 12 | Previous craniotomy site | NM |
Hashimoto et al., 199825 | 49, M | SAH due to ACOM AN | Bifrontal craniotomy | NM | NM | 48 | Anterior cranial fossa | ICH |
Diana et al., 202126 | 71, M | Rt AVM | Rt temporal craniotomy | NM | NM | 4 | Previous craniotomy site | Subacute subdural hematoma |
ACOM = anterior communicating artery; AN = aneurysm; AVM = arteriovenous malformations; CPA = cerebellopontine angle; Dev = development; DVA = developmental venous anomaly; HA = headache; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; IC-PC = internal carotid-posterior communicating artery; MCA = middle cerebral artery; NM = not mentioned; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; SOC = suboccipital artery; STA = superficial temporal artery; TS = transverse sinus.
The involvement of sinus thrombosis in the development of DAVFs after craniotomy has been previously reported.27 Venous hypertension is induced as a result of sinus stenosis or occlusion secondary to sinus thrombosis, which is a surgical complication that can occur particularly after suboccipital craniotomy.28 Terada et al.29 stated that venous hypertension can induce a DAVF. They estimated that increased venous pressure stimulates angiogenesis, resulting in direct connections to the sinus or vein and, ultimately, dural fistulas. Uranishi et al.30 described how angiogenic growth factors, which are produced subsequent to sinus thrombosis and venous hypertension, may be implicated in the development of DAVF. Thus, dural venous sinus stenosis or thrombosis-induced secondary angiogenesis accompanied by venous hypertension may underlie the development of postoperative DAVF, but the precise pathogenesis remains unclear.
In our case, we visualized the detailed architecture of a DAVF that developed secondary to postoperative sinus thrombosis using fusion 3DCG. What is noteworthy about this approach is that it could clearly show how the DAVF developed secondary to postoperative sinus thrombosis. It is also remarkable that the fusion 3DCG demonstrated the positional relationship between the shunt point of the DAVF and the thrombus, showing how branches of the OA and APA extended with neovascularization to the SS along the previous thrombus site. These findings potentially corroborate the aforementioned hypothesis in which sinus thrombosis and venous hypertension are related to the development of DAVF.
Regarding intervention for delayed DAVF after craniotomy, successful management by either surgery or endovascular treatment has been reported (Table 1). Most symptomatic DAVFs after craniotomy in previous reports were treated. However, an asymptomatic case with spontaneous resolution20 and a case with only mild tinnitus that was followed for 4 years with no change14 have also been reported. Observation is a reasonable option for asymptomatic DAVF without CVR.7,31 During follow-up of patients with DAVF, in addition to the presence of symptoms, the presence of CVR is another key factor in deciding the indication for treatment, which should be examined regularly. Lin et al.32 demonstrated how both CTA and MRI/MRA have good diagnostic accuracy for detection of CVR in DAVF. Therefore, routine follow-up with cerebral angiography may not be mandatory given the associated risks. We are conservatively observing our patient using regular MRI/MRA. The lesion has remained stable to date.
Lessons
Our patient experienced a case of delayed postoperative DAVF secondary to SS thrombosis after removal of a large foramen magnum meningioma. Fusion 3DCG demonstrated that the feeders of the DAVF extended to the SS at the previous thrombus site. This finding implies that SS occlusion due to sinus thrombus is associated with the development of postoperative DAVF. There is a risk of delayed DAVF after craniotomy, and patients should be monitored carefully, especially in the case of SS stenosis or occlusion with sinus thrombosis after suboccipital craniotomy.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Author Contributions
Conception and design: Miyawaki, Yajima. Acquisition of data: Miyawaki, Yajima, Kiyofuji, Kin. Analysis and interpretation of data: Miyawaki, Yajima, Kiyofuji. Drafting the article: Miyawaki, Yajima. Critically revising the article: Miyawaki, Koizumi, Kiyofuji, Hongo, Segawa. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: Miyawaki, Koizumi, Kiyofuji, Hongo, Segawa, Nakatomi, Saito. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Miyawaki. Administrative/technical/material support: Miyawaki. Study supervision: Miyawaki, Nakatomi.
References
- 1↑
Newton TH, Cronqvist S. Involvement of dural arteries in intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Radiology. 1969;93(5):1071–1078.
- 2
Gross BA, Du R. The natural history of cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulae. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(3):594–603.
- 3
Awad IA, Little JR, Akarawi WP, Ahl J. Intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations: factors predisposing to an aggressive neurological course. J Neurosurg. 1990;72(6):839–850.
- 4
Malik GM, Pearce JE, Ausman JI, Mehta B. Dural arteriovenous malformations and intracranial hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1984;15(3):332–339.
- 5↑
Yoshino M, Kin T, Hara T. Usefulness of high-resolution three-dimensional multifusion medical imaging for preoperative planning in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformation. World Neurosurg. 2019;124:e755–e763.
- 6↑
Borden JA, Wu JK, Shucart WA. A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg. 1995;82(2):166–179.
- 7↑
Cognard C, Gobin YP, Pierot L, et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology. 1995;194(3):671–680.
- 8↑
Nabors MW, Azzam CJ, Albanna FJ, Gulya AJ, Davis DO, Kobrine AI. Delayed postoperative dural arteriovenous malformations. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 1987;66(5):768–772.
- 9↑
Sasaki T, Hoya K, Kinone K, Kirino T. Postsurgical development of dural arteriovenous malformations after transpetrosal and transtentorial operations: case report. Neurosurgery. 1995;37(4):820–825.
- 10↑
Kim SH, Chang WS, Jung HH, Chang JW. Delayed dural arteriovenous fistula after microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014;56(2):168–170.
- 11↑
Yokoyama S, Nakagawa I, Kotsugi M, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula arising after intracranial surgery in posterior fossa of nondominant sinus: two cases and literature review. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019;14(2):602–606.
- 12↑
Sakaki T, Morimoto T, Nakase H, Kakizaki T, Nagata K. Dural arteriovenous fistula of the posterior fossa developing after surgical occlusion of the sigmoid sinus. Report of five cases. J Neurosurg. 1996;84(1):113–118.
- 13↑
Xue X, Hou Y, Chen J, Yuan X, Sun G, Guo L. Delayed dural arteriovenous fistula at the transverse-sigmoid sinus secondary to petroclival meningioma surgery via far lateral approach. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(7):e583–e585.
- 14↑
Yassari R, Jahromi B, Macdonald R. Dural arteriovenous fistula after craniotomy for pilocytic astrocytoma in a patient with protein S deficiency. Surg Neurol. 2002;58(1):59–64.
- 15↑
Higashida T. Delayed postoperative dural arteriovenous fistula presenting with progressive dementia. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015;2015:bcr2015212874.
- 16↑
Sadahiro H, Ishihara H, Goto H, et al. Postoperative dural arteriovenous fistula in a patient with Cowden disease: a case report. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23(3):572–575.
- 17↑
Dudeck O, van Velthoven V, Schumacher M, Klisch J. Development of a complex dural arteriovenous fistula next to a cerebellar developmental venous anomaly after resection of a brainstem cavernoma. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(2):335–339.
- 18↑
Pabaney AH, Robin AM, Basheer A, Malik G. Surgical management of dural arteriovenous fistula after craniotomy: case report and review of literature. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:731.e7–731.e11.
- 19↑
Davie JC, Hodges F. Arteriovenous fistula after removal of meningioma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1967;27(4):364–369.
- 20↑
Peeters SM, Colby GP, Guivatchian E, Sun MZ, Tateshima S, Wang AC. Spontaneous resolution of dural and pial arteriovenous fistulae arising after superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery bypass for moyamoya disease. World Neurosurg. 2020;142:404–407.
- 21↑
Ugrinovski J, Vrcakovski M, Lozance K. Dural arteriovenous malformation secondary to meningioma removal. Br J Neurosurg. 1989;3(5):603–607.
- 22↑
Watanabe A, Takahara Y, Ibuchi Y, Mizukami K. Two cases of dural arteriovenous malformation occurring after intracranial surgery. Neuroradiology. 1984;26(5):375–380.
- 23↑
Ding D, Brew S, McGuinness B, Mee EW. Iatrogenic dural arteriovenous fistula after surgical resection of a ruptured brain arteriovenous malformation. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2016;7(4):604–606.
- 24↑
Ahn JY, Kim OJ, Joo YJ, Joo JY. Dural arteriovenous malformation occurring after craniotomy for pial arteriovenous malformation. J Clin Neurosci. 2003;10(1):134–136.
- 25↑
Hashimoto H, Iida J, Masui K, Nishi N, Yonezawa T, Sakaki T. Dural arteriovenous malformation of the anterior cranial fossa occurring after bifrontal craniotomy. Surg Neurol. 1998;49(1):47–50.
- 26↑
Diana F, Tosatto L, Haznedari N, Commodaro C, Ruggiero M. De novo dural arteriovenous fistula on draining veins of previously treated pial arteriovenous malformation: a case report. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021;30(7):105798.
- 27↑
Ferro JM, Coutinho JM, Jansen O, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistulae after cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke. 2020;51(11):3344–3347.
- 28↑
Keiper GL Jr, Sherman JD, Tomsick TA, Tew JM Jr. Dural sinus thrombosis and pseudotumor cerebri: unexpected complications of suboccipital craniotomy and translabyrinthine craniectomy. J Neurosurg. 1999;91(2):192–197.
- 29↑
Terada T, Higashida RT, Halbach VV, et al. Development of acquired arteriovenous fistulas in rats due to venous hypertension. J Neurosurg. 1994;80(5):884–889.
- 30↑
Uranishi R, Nakase H, Sakaki T. Expression of angiogenic growth factors in dural arteriovenous fistula. J Neurosurg. 1999;91(5):781–786.
- 31↑
Davies MA, TerBrugge K, Willinsky R, Coyne T, Saleh J, Wallace MC. The validity of classification for the clinical presentation of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(5):830–837.
- 32↑
Lin YH, Wang YF, Liu HM, Lee CW, Chen YF, Hsieh HJ. Diagnostic accuracy of CTA and MRI/MRA in the evaluation of the cortical venous reflux in the intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula DAVF. Neuroradiology. 2018;60(1):7–15.