You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for

  • By Author: Sonntag, Volker K. H. x
  • By Author: Melton, M. Stephen x
Clear All
Restricted access

Paul D. Sawin, Curtis A. Dickman, Neil R. Crawford, M. Stephen Melton, William D. Bichard and Volker K. H. Sonntag

Object. The use of corticosteroid agents during the healing phase after spinal arthrodesis remains controversial. Although anecdotal opinion suggests that corticosteroids may inhibit bone fusion, such an effect has not been substantiated in clinical trials or laboratory investigations. This study was undertaken to delineate the effect of exogenous corticosteroid administration on bone graft incorporation in an experimental model of posterolateral lumbar fusion.

Methods. An established, well-validated model of lumbar intertransverse process spinal fusion in the rabbit was used. Twenty-four adult New Zealand white rabbits underwent L5–6 bilateral posterolateral spinal fusion in which autogenous iliac crest bone graft was used. After surgery, the animals were randomized into two treatment groups: a control group (12 rabbits) that received intramuscular injections of normal saline twice daily and a dexamethasone group (12 rabbits) that received intramuscular dexamethasone (0.05 mg/kg) twice daily. After 42 days, the animals were killed and the integrity of the spinal fusions was assessed by radiography, manual palpation, and biomechanical testing.

In seven (58%) of the 12 control rabbits, solid posterolateral fusion was achieved. In no dexamethasone-treated rabbits was successful fusion achieved (p = 0.003). Tensile strength and stiffness of excised spinal segments were significantly lower in dexamethasone-treated animals than in control animals (tensile strength 91.4 ± 30.6 N and 145.3 ± 48.2, respectively, p = 0.004; stiffness 31.4 ± 11.6 and 45.0 ± 15.2 N/mm, respectively, p = 0.02).

Conclusions. The corticosteroid agent dexamethasone inhibited bone graft incorporation in a rabbit model of single-level posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion, inducing a significantly higher rate of nonunion, compared with that in saline-treated control animals.

Full access

Sait Naderi, Neil R. Crawford, M. Stephen Melton, Volker K. H. Sonntag and Curtis A. Dickman

The authors conducted a biomechancial study to determine whether C-1 ring integrity is important in maintaining normal occiput-C-2 separation, specifically when the anterior arch is transected to provide access to the dens during an odontoidectomy procedure.

Six human cadaveric occiput-C3 specimens were loaded under axial compression, and the bilateral horizontal separation of the C-1 lateral masses and the vertical compression of the occiput relative to C-2 were recorded. Specimens were first studied after odontoidectomy without C-1 ring transection, then after C-1 anterior arch transection, and finally after C-1 lamina transection.

With applied compressive load corresponding to three times the weight of the head, the C-1 ring spread horizontally 1.57 ± 0.30 mm more when the anterior arch of C-1 was transected than when left intact, resulting in 0.74 ± 0.44 mm collapse in the occiput-C-2 vertical separation. After laminar transection, the C-1 ring spread 6.55 ± 2.29 mm more than when it was intact. The resultant vertical separation was a 3.37 ± 1.89-mm collapse in the occiput-C-2. All changes in C-1 spreading and the occiput-C-2 collapse were statistically significant (p < 0.05, paired Student's t-tests). The C-1 ring continuity prevents horizontal spreading caused by the wedging of C-1 between the occiput and C-2 and thus prevents cranial settling. Therefore, to prevent the subsequent development of disease related to cranial settling, the authors recommend that the surgeon resect part of C-1 only if necessary during odontoidectomy.

Restricted access

A. Giancarlo Vishteh, Neil R. Crawford, M. Stephen Melton, Robert F. Spetzler, Volker K. H. Sonntag and Curtis A. Dickman

Object. The authors sought to determine the biomechanics of the occipitoatlantal (occiput [Oc]—C1) and atlantoaxial (C1–2) motion segments after unilateral gradient condylectomy.

Methods. Six human cadaveric specimens (skull with attached upper cervical spine) underwent nondestructive biomechanical testing (physiological loads) during flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Axial translation from tension to compression was also studied across Oc—C2. Each specimen served as its own control and underwent baseline testing in the intact state. The specimens were then tested after progressive unilateral condylectomy (25% resection until completion), which was performed using frameless stereotactic guidance. At Oc—C1 for all motions that were tested, mobility increased significantly compared to baseline after a 50% condylectomy. Flexion—extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation increased 15.3%, 40.8%, and 28.1%, respectively. At C1–2, hypermobility during flexion—extension occurred after a 25% condylectomy, during axial rotation after 75% condylectomy, and during lateral bending after a 100% condylectomy.

Conclusions. Resection of 50% or more of the occipital condyle produces statistically significant hypermobility at Oc—C1. After a 75% resection, the biomechanics of the Oc—C1 and C1–2 motion segments change considerably. Performing fusion of the craniovertebral junction should therefore be considered if half or more of one occipital condyle is resected.