Long-term outcomes of staged Gamma Knife radiosurgery for giant cavernous sinus hemangiomas: a single-center retrospective study

View More View Less
  • 1 Gamma Knife Treatment Center of Henan Province, Gamma Knife Treatment Center of the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, and
  • | 2 Department of Neurosurgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Cavernous sinus hemangiomas (CSHs) are rare benign tumors originating from the cavernous sinus. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been recommended as a primary treatment for small- to medium-sized CSHs. The optimal treatment for giant CSHs is still controversial. In this study, the authors retrospectively reviewed the effectiveness and safety of staged GKRS treatment for giant CSHs.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with giant CSH who received staged GKRS treatment in the Gamma Knife Treatment Center of Henan Province during the period from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2018, were enrolled in this study. Six patients had received microsurgery before GKRS, the other 16 patients were diagnosed according to clinical symptoms and MR images. All of the enrolled patients received 2-stage GKRS, and the mean interval between the two GKRS treatments was 6.5 months (range 6–12 months). For the first GKRS, the median isodose line was 48% (range 45%–50%), the median marginal dose was 13 Gy (range 11.5–14 Gy), and the median coverage of CSHs was 80% (range 70%–88%). For the second GKRS treatment, the median isodose line was 50% (range 45%–55%), the median marginal dose to the CSHs was 10.5 Gy (range 9–12.5 Gy), and the median coverage of the CSHs was 88% (range 80%–94%).

RESULTS

All of the patients received an outpatient review of an enhanced MR image of the head and a clinical physical check every 6 months after the first GKRS treatment. The mean follow-up duration was 52 months (range 24–84 months). The tumor control rate was 100% 24 months after staged GKRS, and at the last follow-up the mean tumor shrinkage rate was 96.7% (range 90.6%–100%) and the mean residual CSH volume was 2.1 ml (range 0–8.5 ml). Twenty patients suffered central nervous system (CNS) injury symptoms to varying degrees before staged GKRS treatment. Complete symptom recovery was found in 11 (55%) patients, improved symptoms in 5 (25%) patients, and no change in 4 (20%) patients after treatment. Only 1 patient suffered temporary preexisting headache aggravation and 1 patient suffered temporary preexisting diplopia aggravation 1 week after receiving the first GKRS treatment. Subacute or chronic complications were not detected after staged GKRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Staged GKRS is an effective treatment for giant CSHs. Because of the impressively low incidence of adverse effects, staged GKRS may be considered as a primary treatment for giant CSHs.

ABBREVIATIONS

CN = cranial nerve; CSH = cavernous sinus hemangioma; GKRS = Gamma Knife radiosurgery.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Linskey ME, Sekhar LN. Cavernous sinus hemangiomas: a series, a review, and an hypothesis. Neurosurgery. 1992;30(1):101108.

  • 2

    Li ZH, Wu Z, Zhang JT, Zhang LW. Surgical management and outcomes of cavernous sinus hemangiomas: a single-institution series of 47 patients. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:e1181e1194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Yin YH, Yu XG, Xu BN, Zhou DB, Bu B, Chen XL. Surgical management of large and giant cavernous sinus hemangiomas. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(1):128133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Bansal S, Suri A, Singh M, Kale SS, Agarwal D, Sharma MS, et al. Cavernous sinus hemangioma: a fourteen year single institution experience. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(6):968974.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Li MH, Zhao JL, Li YY, Zeng CH, Xu GS, Hong T. Extradural transcavernous approach to cavernous sinus cavernous hemangiomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;136:110115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Cho JM, Sung KS, Jung IH, Chang WS, Jung HH, Chang JH. Temporal volume change of cavernous sinus cavernous hemangiomas after gamma knife surgery. Yonsei Med J. 2020;61(11):976980.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Kardes O, Tufan K. Treatment of cavernous sinus hemangiomas with gamma knife radiosurgery as a primary and sole therapy. Turk Neurosurg. 2019;29(6):823828.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Lee CC, Sheehan JP, Kano H, Akpinar B, Martinez-Alvarez R, Martinez-Moreno N, et al. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for hemangioma of the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(5):14981505.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Wang Y, Li P, Zhang XJ, Xu YY, Wang W. Gamma knife surgery for cavernous sinus hemanginoma: a report of 32 cases. World Neurosurg. 2016;94:1825.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Tang X, Wu H, Wang B, Zhang N, Dong Y, Ding J, et al. A new classification and clinical results of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cavernous sinus hemangiomas: a report of 53 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(6):961969.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Schwyzer L, Tuleasca C, Borruat FX, Radovanovic I, Levivier M. Gamma Knife surgery for a hemangioma of the cavernous sinus in an adult: case report and short review of the literature. Neurochirurgie. 2017;63(4):320322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Anqi X, Zhang S, Jiahe X, Chao Y. Cavernous sinus cavernous hemangioma: imaging features and therapeutic effect of Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;127:5964.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Tripathi M, Batish A, Kumar N, Ahuja CK, Oinam AS, Kaur R, et al. Safety and efficacy of single-fraction gamma knife radiosurgery for benign confined cavernous sinus tumors: our experience and literature review. Neurosurg Rev. 2020;43(1):2740.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Song SW, Kim DG, Chung HT, Paek SH, Han JH, Kim YH, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous sinus hemangiomas. J Neurooncol. 2014;118(1):163168.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Xu Q, Shen J, Feng Y, Zhan R. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for the treatment of cavernous sinus hemangiomas. Oncol Lett. 2016;11(2):15451548.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Park CK, Choi SK, Kang IH, Choi MK, Park BJ, Lim YJ. Radiosurgical considerations for cavernous sinus hemangioma: long-term clinical outcomes. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(2):313318.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Nakamura N, Shin M, Tago M, Terahara A, Kurita H, Nakagawa K, Ohtomo K. Gamma knife radiosurgery for cavernous hemangiomas in the cavernous sinus. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(5 suppl):477480.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Wang X, Zhu H, Knisely J, Mei G, Liu X, Dai J, et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment strategy for giant cavernous sinus hemangiomas. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(1):6067.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Wang X, Liu X, Mei G, Dai J, Pan L, Wang E. Phase II study to assess the efficacy of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with large cavernous sinus hemangiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83(2):e223e230.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Huang L, Sun L, Wang W, Cui Z, Zhang Z, Li J, et al. Therapeutic effect of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using CyberKnife for high volume cavernous sinus cavernous hemangiomas. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019;18:1533033819876981.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Iwai Y, Yamanaka K, Nakajima H, Yasui T. Stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous sinus cavernous hemangioma—case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1999;39(4):288290.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Xin Z, Yao Y, Chen G, Wang L, Shu M, Lv Q, et al. Fractionated radiation therapy for large and giant cavernous sinus hemangioma: a retrospective study. Front Neurol. 2020;11:355.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Park S, Yoon SM, Lee S, Park JH, Song SY, Lee SW, et al. Role of fractionated radiotherapy in patients with hemangioma of the cavernous sinus. Radiat Oncol J. 2017;35(3):268273.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Lee AG, Miller NR, Brazis PW, Benson ML. Cavernous sinus hemangioma. Clinical and neuroimaging features. J Neuroophthalmol. 1995;15(4):225229.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Montoya F, Vidal A, Sepulveda F, Marileo R, Caro J, Castillo M. Cavernous sinus hemangioma: imaging diagnosis and surgical considerations. World Neurosurg. 2021;146:e30e37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Mahajan A, Rao VRK, Anantaram G, Polnaya AM, Desai S, Desai P, et al. Clinical-radiological-pathological correlation of cavernous sinus hemangioma: incremental value of diffusion-weighted imaging. World J Radiol. 2017;9(8):330338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Yao Z, Feng X, Chen X, Zee C. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics with pathological correlation of cavernous malformation in cavernous sinus. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30(6):975979.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Srinivas D, Sarma P, Shukla D, Bhat D, Pandey P, Somanna S, Chandramouli A. Multimodality management of cavernous sinus hemangiomas-an institutional experience. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017;78(5):399407.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 222 222 153
Full Text Views 26 26 11
PDF Downloads 32 32 10
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0