Resection of vestibular schwannomas after stereotactic radiosurgery: a systematic review

View More View Less
  • 1 Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio;
  • 2 Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago;
  • 3 Northwestern Medicine, Geneva;
  • 4 Rush Medical College, Chicago; and
  • 5 Department of Otolaryngology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Multiple short series have evaluated the efficacy of salvage microsurgery (MS) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VSs); however, there is a lack of a large volume of patient data available for interpretation and clinical adaptation. The goal of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of tumor characteristics, management, and surgical outcomes of salvage of MS after SRS for VS.

METHODS

The Medline/PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were queried according to PRISMA guidelines. All English-language and translated publications were included. Studies lacking adequate study characteristics and outcomes were excluded. Cases involving neurofibromatosis type 2, previous MS, or malignant transformation were excluded when possible.

RESULTS

Twenty studies containing 297 cases met inclusion criteria. Three additional cases from Rush University Medical Center were added for 300 total cases. Tumor growth with or without symptoms was the primary indication for salvage surgery (92.3% of cases), followed by worsening of symptoms without growth (4.6%) and cystic enlargement (3.1%). The average time to MS after SRS was 39.4 months. The average size and volume of tumor at surgery were 2.44 cm and 5.92 cm3, respectively. The surgical approach was retrosigmoid (42.8%) and translabyrinthine (57.2%); 59.5% of patients had a House-Brackmann (HB) grade of I or II. The facial nerve was preserved in 91.5% of cases. Facial nerve preservation and HB grades were lower for the translabyrinthine versus retrosigmoid approach (p = 0.31 and p = 0.18, respectively); however, fewer complications were noted in the translabyrinthine approach (p = 0.29). Gross-total resection (GTR) was completed in 55.7% of surgeries. Studies that predominantly used subtotal resection (STR) were associated with a lower rate of facial nerve injury (5.3% vs 11.3%, p = 0.07) and higher rate of HB grade I or II (72.9% vs 48.0%, p = 0.00003) versus those using predominantly GTR. However, majority STR was associated with a recurrence rate of 3.6% as compared to 1.4% for majority GTR (p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the leading cause of MS after SRS was tumor growth at an average of 39.4 months after radiation. There were no significant differences in outcomes of facial nerve preservation, postoperative HB grade, or complication rate based on surgical approach. Patients who underwent STR showed statistically significant better HB outcomes compared with GTR. MS after SRS was considered by most authors to be more difficult than primary MS. These data support the notion that the surgical goals of salvage surgery are debulking of tumor mass, decreasing compression of the brainstem, and not necessarily pursuing GTR.

ABBREVIATIONS CK = CyberKnife; fSRT = fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy; GKS = Gamma Knife surgery; GTR = gross-total resection; HB = House-Brackmann; LINAC = linear accelerator; MS = microsurgery; NF2 = neurofibromatosis type 2; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; STR = subtotal resection; VS = vestibular schwannoma.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence R. Mark Wiet: Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL. richard_wiet@rush.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online November 27, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.7.JNS2044.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

  • 1

    Kleijwegt M, Ho V, Visser O, Real incidence of vestibular schwannoma? Estimations from a national registry. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(9):14111417.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Kshettry VR, Hsieh JK, Ostrom QT, Incidence of vestibular schwannomas in the United States. J Neurooncol. 2015;124(2):223228.

  • 3

    Babu R, Sharma R, Bagley JH, Vestibular schwannomas in the modern era: epidemiology, treatment trends, and disparities in management. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(1):121130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Stangerup S-E, Caye-Thomasen P. Epidemiology and natural history of vestibular schwannomas. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012;45(2):257268, vii.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Marinelli JP, Lohse CM, Carlson ML. Incidence of vestibular schwannoma over the past half-century: a population-based study of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159(4):717723.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Carlson ML, Habermann EB, Wagie AE, The changing landscape of vestibular schwannoma management in the United States—a shift toward conservatism. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153(3):440446.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Mathieu D, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2: an analysis of tumor control, complications, and hearing preservation rates. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(3):460470.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Tsao MN, Sahgal A, Xu W, Stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guideline. J Radiosurg SBRT. 2017;5(1):524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Persson O, Bartek J Jr, Shalom NB, Stereotactic radiosurgery vs. fractionated radiotherapy for tumor control in vestibular schwannoma patients: a systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159(6):10131021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kondziolka D, Mousavi SH, Kano H, The newly diagnosed vestibular schwannoma: radiosurgery, resection, or observation? Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Nonaka Y, Fukushima T, Watanabe K, Surgical management of vestibular schwannomas after failed radiation treatment. Neurosurg Rev. 2016;39(2):303312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Aboukaïs R, Bonne N-X, Touzet G, Progression of vestibular schawnnoma after GammaKnife radiosurgery: a challenge for microsurgical resection. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;168:7782.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Battista RA, Wiet RJ. Stereotactic radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas: a survey of the American Neurotology Society. Am J Otol. 2000;21(3):371381.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Breshears JD, Osorio JA, Cheung SW, Surgery after primary radiation treatment for sporadic vestibular schwannomas: case series. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017;13(4):441447.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Couldwell WT, Mohan AL. Enlargement of a vestibular schwannoma after stereotactic radiotherapy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002;144(12):13191322.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Friedman RA, Berliner KI, Bassim M, A paradigm shift in salvage surgery for radiated vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(8):13221328.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Gerganov VM, Giordano M, Samii A, Samii M. Surgical treatment of patients with vestibular schwannomas after failed previous radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(4):713720.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Hong B, Krauss JK, Bremer M, Vestibular schwannoma microsurgery for recurrent tumors after radiation therapy or previous surgical resection. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(1):171181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Husseini ST, Piccirillo E, Taibah A, Salvage surgery of vestibular schwannoma after failed radiotherapy: the Gruppo Otologico experience and review of the literature. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34(2):107114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Iwai Y, Ishibashi K, Nakanishi Y, Functional outcomes of salvage surgery for vestibular schwannomas after failed gamma knife radiosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2016;90:385390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Lee C-C, Wu H-M, Chung W-Y, Microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma after Gamma Knife surgery: challenges and treatment strategies. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(suppl):150159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Lee DJ, Westra WH, Staecker H, Clinical and histopathologic features of recurrent vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma) after stereotactic radiosurgery. Otol Neurotol. 2003;24(4):650660.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Lee H-J, Kim MJ, Koh SH, Comparing outcomes following salvage microsurgery in vestibular schwannoma patients failing gamma-knife radiosurgery or microsurgery. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(9):13391344.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Limb CJ, Long DM, Niparko JK. Acoustic neuromas after failed radiation therapy: challenges of surgical salvage. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(1):9398.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Pollock BE, Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Vestibular schwannoma management. Part II. Failed radiosurgery and the role of delayed microsurgery. J Neurosurg. 1998;89(6):949955.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Roche P-H, Khalil M, Thomassin J-M, Surgical removal of vestibular schwannoma after failed Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Prog Neurol Surg. 2008;21:152157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Schulder M, Sreepada GS, Kwartler JA, Cho ES. Microsurgical removal of a vestibular schwannoma after stereotactic radiosurgery: surgical and pathologic findings. Am J Otol. 1999;20(3):364368.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Shuto T, Matsunaga S. Two cases of cystic enlargement of vestibular schwannoma as a late complication following gamma knife surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;33:239241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Shuto T, Inomori S, Matsunaga S, Fujino H. Microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma after gamma knife radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008;150(3):229234.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Wise SC, Carlson ML, Tveiten OV, Surgical salvage of recurrent vestibular schwannoma following prior stereotactic radiosurgery. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(11):25802586.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Schumacher AJ, Lall RR, Lall RR, Low-dose Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: tumor control and cranial nerve function preservation after 11 Gy. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017;78(1):210.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Nagano O, Higuchi Y, Serizawa T, Transient expansion of vestibular schwannoma following stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2008;109(5):811816.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Kano H, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(2):520527.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Taha I, Hyvärinen A, Ranta A, Facial nerve function and hearing after microsurgical removal of sporadic vestibular schwannomas in a population-based cohort. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162(1):4354.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Hong W, Cheng H, Wang X, Feng C. Influencing factors analysis of facial nerve function after the microsurgical resection of acoustic neuroma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60(2):165173.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Hatch JL, Bauschard MJ, Nguyen SA, National trends in vestibular schwannoma surgery: influence of patient characteristics on outcomes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159(1):102109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Copeland WR, Mallory GW, Neff BA, Are there modifiable risk factors to prevent a cerebrospinal fluid leak following vestibular schwannoma surgery? J Neurosurg. 2015;122(2):312316.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 619 619 47
Full Text Views 115 115 9
PDF Downloads 60 60 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0