Use of endoscopic transorbital and endonasal approaches for 360° circumferential access to orbital tumors

Chiman Jeon MD 1 , Sang Duk Hong MD, MS 2 , Kyung In Woo MD, PhD 3 , Ho Jun Seol MD, PhD 1 , Do-Hyun Nam MD, PhD 1 , Jung-Il Lee MD, PhD 1 and Doo-Sik Kong MD, PhD 1
View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurosurgery,
  • 2 Otolaryngology, and
  • 3 Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Orbital tumors are often surgically challenging because they require an extensive fronto-temporo-orbital zygomatic approach (FTOZ) and a multidisciplinary team approach to provide the best outcomes. Recently, minimally invasive endoscopic techniques via a transorbital superior eyelid approach (ETOA) or endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) have been proposed as viable alternatives to transcranial approaches for orbital tumors. In this study, the authors investigated the feasibility of 360° circumferential access to orbital tumors via both ETOA and EEA.

METHODS

Between April 2014 and June 2019, 16 patients with orbital tumors underwent either ETOA or EEA at the authors’ institution. Based on the neuro-topographic “four-zone model” of the orbit with its tumor epicenter around the optic nerve in the coronal plane, ETOA (n = 10, 62.5%) was performed for tumors located predominantly superolateral to the nerve and EEA (n = 6, 37.5%) for those located predominantly inferomedial to the nerve. Eight patients (50%) presented with intraconal tumors and 8 (50%) with extraconal ones. The orbital tumors included orbital schwannoma (n = 6), cavernous hemangioma (n = 2), olfactory groove meningioma (n = 1), sphenoorbital meningioma (n = 1), chondrosarcoma (n = 1), trigeminal schwannoma (n = 1), metastatic osteosarcoma (n = 1), mature cystic teratoma (n = 1), sebaceous carcinoma (n = 1), and ethmoid sinus osteoma (n = 1). The clinical outcomes and details of surgical techniques were reviewed.

RESULTS

Gross-total resection was achieved in 12 patients (75%), near-total resection in 3 (18.8%), and subtotal resection in 1 (6.2%). Eight (88.9%) of the 9 patients with preoperative proptosis showed improvement after surgery, and 4 (66.7%) of the 6 patients with visual symptoms demonstrated improvement. Four (40%) of the 10 patients treated with ETOA experienced partial third nerve palsy immediately after surgery (3 transient and 1 persistent). There have been no postoperative CSF leaks or infections in this series.

CONCLUSIONS

Without transcranial approaches requiring temporalis muscle dissection and orbitozygomatic osteotomy, the selection of ETOA or EEA based on a concept of a four-zone model with its epicenter around the optic nerve successfully provides a minimally invasive 360° circumferential access to the entire orbit with acceptable morbidity.

ABBREVIATIONS EEA = endoscopic endonasal approach; ETOA = endoscopic transorbital superior eyelid approach; FTOZ = fronto-temporo-orbital zygomatic approach; GTR = gross-total resection; NTR = near-total resection; STR = subtotal resection.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Doo-Sik Kong: Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. neurokong@gmail.com.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online September 25, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.6.JNS20890.

C.J. and S.D.H. contributed equally to this work.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

  • 1

    Shields JA, Shields CL, Scartozzi R. Survey of 1264 patients with orbital tumors and simulating lesions: The 2002 Montgomery Lecture, part 1. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(5):9971008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Darsaut TE, Lanzino G, Lopes MB, Newman S. An introductory overview of orbital tumors. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;10(5):E1.

  • 3

    Paluzzi A, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC, “Round-the-clock” surgical access to the orbit. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(1):1224.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Signorelli F, Anile C, Rigante M, Endoscopic treatment of orbital tumors. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(3):270274.

  • 5

    Moe KS, Bergeron CM, Ellenbogen RG. Transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(3 Suppl Operative):ons16ons28.

  • 6

    Castelnuovo P, Turri-Zanoni M, Battaglia P, Endoscopic endonasal management of orbital pathologies. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015;26(3):463472.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Hong SD, Nam DH, Kong DS, Endoscopic modified transseptal transsphenoidal approach for maximal preservation of sinonasal quality of life and olfaction. World Neurosurg. 2016;87:162169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Jeon C, Hong CK, Woo KI, Endoscopic transorbital surgery for Meckel’s cave and middle cranial fossa tumors: surgical technique and early results. J Neurosurg. 2019;131(4):11261135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kong DS, Hong CK, Hong SD, Selection of endoscopic or transcranial surgery for tuberculum sellae meningiomas according to specific anatomical features: a retrospective multicenter analysis (KOSEN-002). J Neurosurg. 2018;130(3):838847.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Kong DS, Young SM, Hong CK, Clinical and ophthalmological outcome of endoscopic transorbital surgery for cranioorbital tumors. J Neurosurg. 2018;131(3):667675.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Lee MH, Hong SD, Woo KI, Endoscopic endonasal versus transorbital surgery for middle cranial fossa tumors: comparison of clinical outcomes based on surgical corridors. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:e1491e1504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Park HH, Hong SD, Kim YH, Endoscopic transorbital and endonasal approach for trigeminal schwannomas: a retrospective multicenter analysis (KOSEN-005). J Neurosurg. 2020;133(2):467476.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Kim KH, Kim YH, Dho YS, Is low-lying optic chiasm an obstacle to an endoscopic endonasal approach for retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas? (Korean Society of Endoscopic Neurosurgery-003). World Neurosurg. 2018;114:e306e316.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kim YH, Jeon C, Se YB, Clinical outcomes of an endoscopic transclival and transpetrosal approach for primary skull base malignancies involving the clivus. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(5):14541462.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Dziedzic TA, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the lateral orbital apex: case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;16(3):305308.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Antisdel JL, Gumber D, Holmes J, Sindwani R. Management of sinonasal complications after endoscopic orbital decompression for Graves’ orbitopathy. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(9):20942098.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Bejjani GK, Cockerham KP, Kennerdel JS, Maroon JC. A reappraisal of surgery for orbital tumors. Part I: extraorbital approaches. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;10(5):E2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Berhouma M, Jacquesson T, Abouaf L, Endoscopic endonasal optic nerve and orbital apex decompression for nontraumatic optic neuropathy: surgical nuances and review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(4):E19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Cockerham KP, Bejjani GK, Kennerdell JS, Maroon JC. Surgery for orbital tumors. Part II: transorbital approaches. Neurosurg Focus. 2001;10(5):E3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Ciporen JN, Moe KS, Ramanathan D, Multiportal endoscopic approaches to the central skull base: a cadaveric study. World Neurosurg. 2010;73(6):705712.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Jacquesson T, Abouaf L, Berhouma M, Jouanneau E. How I do it: the endoscopic endonasal optic nerve and orbital apex decompression. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014;156(10):18911896.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Kong DS, Shin HJ, Kim HY, Endoscopic optic canal decompression for compressive optic neuropathy. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(11):15411545.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Lee JY, Ramakrishnan VR, Chiu AG, Endoscopic endonasal surgical resection of tumors of the medial orbital apex and wall. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(1):9398.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Lenzi R, Muscatello L. Considerations about endoscopic endonasal optic nerve and orbital apex decompression. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(4):629630.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Almeida JP, Omay SB, Shetty SR, Transorbital endoscopic eyelid approach for resection of sphenoorbital meningiomas with predominant hyperostosis: report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(6):18851895.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Lim JH, Sardesai MG, Ferreira M Jr, Moe KS. Transorbital neuroendoscopic management of sinogenic complications involving the frontal sinus, orbit, and anterior cranial fossa. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2012;73(6):394400.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Kennerdell JS, Maroon JC, Celin SE. The posterior inferior orbitotomy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;14(4):277280.

  • 28

    Schick U, Dott U, Hassler W. Surgical treatment of orbital cavernomas. Surg Neurol. 2003;60(3):234244.

  • 29

    Karaki M, Kobayashi R, Kobayashi E, Computed tomographic evaluation of anatomic relationship between the paranasal structures and orbital contents for endoscopic endonasal transethmoidal approach to the orbit. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(1)(suppl 1):ONS15ONS20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Kloek CE, Bilyk JR, Pribitkin EA, Rubin PA. Orbital decompression as an alternative management strategy for patients with benign tumors located at the orbital apex. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(7):12141219.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Roth J, Fraser JF, Singh A, Surgical approaches to the orbital apex: comparison of endoscopic endonasal and transcranial approaches using a novel 3D endoscope. Orbit. 2011;30(1):4348.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1086 1086 1085
Full Text Views 93 93 93
PDF Downloads 83 83 83
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0