Prognostic value of the Simpson grading scale in modern meningioma surgery: Barrow Neurological Institute experience

View More View Less
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Recently, the prognostic value of the Simpson resection grading scale has been called into question for modern meningioma surgery. In this study, the authors analyzed the relationship between Simpson resection grade and meningioma recurrence in their institutional experience.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent resection of a WHO grade I intracranial meningioma at the authors’ institution from 2007 to 2017. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess for predictors of Simpson grade IV resection and postoperative neurological morbidity. Cox multivariate analysis was used to assess for predictors of tumor recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to assess and compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) of Simpson resection grades, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 492 patients with evaluable data were included for analysis, including 394 women (80.1%) and 98 men (19.9%) with a mean (SD) age of 58.7 (12.8) years. The tumors were most commonly located at the skull base (n = 302; 61.4%) or the convexity/parasagittal region (n = 139; 28.3%). The median (IQR) tumor volume was 6.8 (14.3) cm3. Simpson grade I, II, III, or IV resection was achieved in 105 (21.3%), 155 (31.5%), 52 (10.6%), and 180 (36.6%) patients, respectively. Sixty-three of 180 patients (35.0%) with Simpson grade IV resection were treated with adjuvant radiosurgery. In the multivariate analysis, increasing largest tumor dimension (p < 0.01) and sinus invasion (p < 0.01) predicted Simpson grade IV resection, whereas skull base location predicted neurological morbidity (p = 0.02). Tumor recurrence occurred in 63 patients (12.8%) at a median (IQR) of 36 (40.3) months from surgery. Simpson grade I resection resulted in superior RFS compared with Simpson grade II resection (p = 0.02), Simpson grade III resection (p = 0.01), and Simpson grade IV resection with adjuvant radiosurgery (p = 0.01) or without adjuvant radiosurgery (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, Simpson grade I resection was independently associated with no tumor recurrence (p = 0.04). Simpson grade II and III resections resulted in superior RFS compared with Simpson grade IV resection without adjuvant radiosurgery (p < 0.01) but similar RFS compared with Simpson grade IV resection with adjuvant radiosurgery (p = 0.82). Simpson grade IV resection with adjuvant radiosurgery resulted in superior RFS compared with Simpson grade IV resection without adjuvant radiosurgery (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The Simpson resection grading scale continues to hold substantial prognostic value in the modern neurosurgical era. When feasible, Simpson grade I resection should remain the goal of intracranial meningioma surgery. Simpson grade IV resection with adjuvant radiosurgery resulted in similar RFS compared with Simpson grade II and III resections.

ABBREVIATIONS mRS = modified Rankin Scale; RFS = recurrence-free survival.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Andrew S. Little: c/o Neuroscience Publications, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ. neuropub@barrowneuro.org.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online October 23, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.6.JNS20374.

Disclosures Dr. Little: consultant for Spiway and ownership in Kogent.

  • 1

    Simpson D. The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1957;20(1):2239.

  • 2

    Al-Mefty O. Operative Atlas of Meningiomas. Lippincott-Raven; 1998.

  • 3

    Jääskeläinen J. Seemingly complete removal of histologically benign intracranial meningioma: late recurrence rate and factors predicting recurrence in 657 patients. A multivariate analysis. Surg Neurol. 1986;26(5):461469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Stafford SL, Perry A, Suman VJ, Primarily resected meningiomas: outcome and prognostic factors in 581 Mayo Clinic patients, 1978 through 1988. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998;73(10):936942.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Adegbite AB, Khan MI, Paine KW, Tan LK. The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurosurg. 1983;58(1):5156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Sughrue ME, Kane AJ, Shangari G, The relevance of Simpson Grade I and II resection in modern neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization Grade I meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2010;113(5):10291035.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Oya S, Kawai K, Nakatomi H, Saito N. Significance of Simpson grading system in modern meningioma surgery: integration of the grade with MIB-1 labeling index as a key to predict the recurrence of WHO Grade I meningiomas. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(1):121128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Heald JB, Carroll TA, Mair RJ. Simpson grade: an opportunity to reassess the need for complete resection of meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014;156(2):383388.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Otero-Rodriguez A, Tabernero MD, Munoz-Martin MC, Re-evaluating Simpson grade I, II, and III resections in neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization grade I meningiomas. World Neurosurg. 2016;96:483488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803820.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Nanda A, Bir SC, Maiti TK, Relevance of Simpson grading system and recurrence-free survival after surgery for World Health Organization Grade I meningioma. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(1):201211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Winther TL, Torp SH. Significance of the extent of resection in modern neurosurgical practice of World Health Organization grade I meningiomas. World Neurosurg. 2017;99:104110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Przybylowski CJ, Raper DM, Starke RM, Stereotactic radiosurgery of meningiomas following resection: predictors of progression. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(1):161165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kondziolka D, Patel AD, Kano H, Long-term outcomes after gamma knife radiosurgery for meningiomas. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016;39(5):453457.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Couldwell WT, Cole CD, Al-Mefty O. Patterns of skull base meningioma progression after failed radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(1):3035.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Ehresman JS, Garzon-Muvdi T, Rogers D, The relevance of Simpson grade resections in modern neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization grade I, II, and III meningiomas. World Neurosurg. 2018;109:e588e593.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Hasseleid BF, Meling TR, Rønning P, Surgery for convexity meningioma: Simpson Grade I resection as the goal: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(6):9991006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Gousias K, Schramm J, Simon M. The Simpson grading revisited: aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management. J Neurosurg. 2016;125(3):551560.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Pollock BE, Stafford SL, Utter A, Stereotactic radiosurgery provides equivalent tumor control to Simpson Grade 1 resection for patients with small- to medium-size meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(4):10001005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Cohen-Inbar O, Lee CC, Schlesinger D, Long-term results of stereotactic radiosurgery for skull base meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2016;79(1):5868.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Kreil W, Luggin J, Fuchs I, Long term experience of gamma knife radiosurgery for benign skull base meningiomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(10):14251430.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Morokoff AP, Zauberman J, Black PM. Surgery for convexity meningiomas. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(3):427434.

  • 23

    Alvernia JE, Dang ND, Sindou MP. Convexity meningiomas: study of recurrence factors with special emphasis on the cleavage plane in a series of 100 consecutive patients. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(3):491498.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Magill ST, Theodosopoulos PV, McDermott MW. Resection of falx and parasagittal meningioma: complication avoidance. J Neurooncol. 2016;130(2):253262.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Sughrue ME, Rutkowski MJ, Shangari G, Results with judicious modern neurosurgical management of parasagittal and falcine meningiomas. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(3):731737.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Mantovani A, Di Maio S, Ferreira MJ, Sekhar LN. Management of meningiomas invading the major dural venous sinuses: operative technique, results, and potential benefit for higher grade tumors. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(3-4):455467.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Zeeshan Q, Patel A, Cheng CY, Resection of meningiomas involving major dural venous sinuses: classification, technique, and long-term results. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e521e536.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Mazur MD, Cutler A, Couldwell WT, Taussky P. Management of meningiomas involving the transverse or sigmoid sinus. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(6):E9.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Han MS, Kim YJ, Moon KS, Lessons from surgical outcome for intracranial meningioma involving major venous sinus. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(35):e4705.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Sahm F, Schrimpf D, Olar A, TERT promoter mutations and risk of recurrence in meningioma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;108(5):djv377.

  • 31

    Sahm F, Schrimpf D, Stichel D, DNA methylation-based classification and grading system for meningioma: a multicentre, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(5):682694.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1448 1448 1138
Full Text Views 189 189 107
PDF Downloads 106 106 68
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0