Oblique trajectory angles in robotic stereo-electroencephalography

View More View Less
  • 1 Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston;
  • 2 Texas Institute for Restorative Neurotechnologies, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; and
  • 3 Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Traditional stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) entails the use of orthogonal trajectories guided by seizure semiology and arteriography. Advances in robotic stereotaxy and computerized neuronavigation have made oblique trajectories more feasible and easier to implement without formal arteriography. Such trajectories provide access to components of seizure networks not readily sampled using orthogonal trajectories. However, the dogma regarding the relative safety and predictability of orthogonal and azimuth-based trajectories persists, given the absence of data regarding the safety and efficacy of oblique sEEG trajectories. In this study, the authors evaluated the relative accuracy and efficacy of both orthogonal and oblique trajectories during robotic implantation of sEEG electrodes to sample seizure networks.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 150 consecutive procedures in 134 patients, accounting for 2040 electrode implantations. Of these, 837 (41%) were implanted via oblique trajectories (defined as an entry angle > 30°). Accuracy was calculated by comparing the deviation of each electrode at the entry and the target point from the planned trajectory using postimplantation imaging.

RESULTS

The mean entry and target deviations were 1.57 mm and 1.89 mm for oblique trajectories compared with 1.38 mm and 1.69 mm for orthogonal trajectories, respectively. Entry point deviation was significantly associated with entry angle, but the impact of this relationship was negligible (−0.015-mm deviation per degree). Deviation at the target point was not significantly affected by the entry angle. No hemorrhagic or infectious complications were observed in the entire cohort, further suggesting that these differences were not meaningful in a clinical context. Of the patients who then underwent definitive procedures after sEEG, 69 patients had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up, of whom 58 (84%) achieved an Engel class I or II outcome during a median follow-up of 27 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of stereotactic errors in this study falls squarely within the range reported in the sEEG literature, which primarily features orthogonal trajectories. The patient outcomes reported in this study suggest that seizure foci are well localized using oblique trajectories. Thus, the selective use of oblique trajectories in the authors’ cohort was associated with excellent safety and efficacy, with no patient incidents, and the findings support the use of oblique trajectories as an effective and safe means of investigating seizure networks.

ABBREVIATIONS EPD = entry point deviation; MRgLITT = MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy; RMS = root mean square; sEEG = stereo-electroencephalography; TPD = target point deviation.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Data (PDF 3.78 MB)

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Nitin Tandon: University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX. nitin.tandon@uth.tmc.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online August 14, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.JNS20975.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

  • 1

    De Almeida AN, Olivier A, Quesney F, Efficacy of and morbidity associated with stereoelectroencephalography using computerized tomography—or magnetic resonance imaging-guided electrode implantation. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(4):483487.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Tandon N, Tong BA, Friedman ER, Analysis of morbidity and outcomes associated with use of subdural grids vs stereoelectroencephalography in patients with intractable epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(6):672681.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Cardinale F, Cossu M, Castana L, Stereoelectroencephalography: surgical methodology, safety, and stereotactic application accuracy in 500 procedures. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(3):353366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Alomar S, Jones J, Maldonado A, Gonzalez-Martinez J. The stereo-electroencephalography methodology. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2016;27(1):8395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Yang M, Ma Y, Li W, A retrospective analysis of stereoelectroencephalography and subdural electroencephalography for preoperative evaluation of intractable epilepsy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2017;95(1):1320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Engel J Jr, Van Ness PC, Rasmussen TB, Ojemann LM. Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. In: Engel J Jr, ed. Surgical Treatment of the Epilepsies. 2nd ed. Raven Press; 1993:609621.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Cossu M, Chabardès S, Hoffmann D, Lo Russo G. Presurgical evaluation of intractable epilepsy using stereo-electro-encephalography methodology: principles, technique and morbidity. Article in French. Neurochirurgie. 2008;54(3):367373.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Yan H, Katz JS, Anderson M, Method of invasive monitoring in epilepsy surgery and seizure freedom and morbidity: a systematic review. Epilepsia. 2019;60(9):19601972.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    González-Martínez J, Bulacio J, Thompson S, Technique, results, and complications related to robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography. Neurosurgery. 2016;78(2):169180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Cardinale F, Casaceli G, Raneri F, Implantation of stereoelectroencephalography electrodes: a systematic review. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;33(6):490502.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Serletis D, Bulacio J, Bingaman W, The stereotactic approach for mapping epileptic networks: a prospective study of 200 patients. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(5):12391246.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Bancaud J, Dell MB. Technics and method of stereotaxic functional exploration of the brain structures in man (cortex, subcortex, central gray nuclei). Article in French. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1959;101:213227.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Talairach J, Tournoux P. Stereotaxic localization of central gray nuclei. Article in French. Neurochirurgia (Stuttg). 1958;1(1):8893.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Bancaud J, Bonis A, Talairach J, The value of stereotaxic functional exploration in the localization of expansive lesions. Article in French. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez. 1961;105:219220.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Talairach J, Bancaud J, Bonis A, Functional stereotaxic investigations in epilepsy. Methodological remarks concerning a case. Article in French. Rev Neurol (Paris). 1961;105:119130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Talairach J, Bancaud J, Bonis A, Functional stereotaxic exploration of epilepsy. Confin Neurol. 1962;22:328331.

  • 17

    Charlton MH. La Stereo-Electroencephalographie dans l’Epilepsie. Arch Neurol. 1965;13(3):333.

  • 18

    Iordanou JC, Camara D, Ghatan S, Panov F. Approach angle affects accuracy in robotic SEEG lead placement. World Neurosurg. 2019;128:e322e328.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Chassoux F, Navarro V, Catenoix H, Planning and management of SEEG. Neurophysiol Clin. 2018;48(1):2537.

  • 20

    Gonzalez-Martinez J, Mullin J, Vadera S, Stereotactic placement of depth electrodes in medically intractable epilepsy. J Neurosurg. 2014;120(3):639644.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Brandmeir NJ, Savaliya S, Rohatgi P, Sather M. The comparative accuracy of the ROSA stereotactic robot across a wide range of clinical applications and registration techniques. J Robot Surg. 2018;12(1):157163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Lefranc M, Capel C, Pruvot AS, The impact of the reference imaging modality, registration method and intraoperative flat-panel computed tomography on the accuracy of the ROSA® stereotactic robot. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2014;92(4):242250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 1999;9(2):179194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Pieters TA, Conner CR, Tandon N. Recursive grid partitioning on a cortical surface model: an optimized technique for the localization of implanted subdural electrodes. J Neurosurg. 2013;118(5):10861097.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner M, Nachtsheim C. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th ed. WCB McGraw-Hill; 1996.

  • 26

    Kadipasaoglu CM, Baboyan VG, Conner CR, Surface-based mixed effects multilevel analysis of grouped human electrocorticography. Neuroimage. 2014;101:215224.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Wieser HG, Blume WT, Fish D, ILAE Commission report proposal for a new classification of outcome with respect to epileptic seizures following epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2001;42(2):282286.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Vakharia VN, Sparks R, O’Keeffe AG, Accuracy of intracranial electrode placement for stereoencephalography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsia. 2017;58(6):921932.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Sindou M, Guenot M, Isnard J, Temporo-mesial epilepsy surgery: outcome and complications in 100 consecutive adult patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;148(1):3945.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Gonzalez-Martinez J, Bulacio J, Alexopoulos A, Stereoelectroencephalography in the “difficult to localize” refractory focal epilepsy: early experience from a North American epilepsy center. Epilepsia. 2013;54(2):323330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Mullin JP, Shriver M, Alomar S, Is SEEG safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis of stereo-electroencephalography-related complications. Epilepsia. 2016;57(3):386401.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Schmidt RF, Wu C, Lang MJ, Complications of subdural and depth electrodes in 269 patients undergoing 317 procedures for invasive monitoring in epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2016;57(10):16971708.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Wellmer J, von der Groeben F, Klarmann U, Risks and benefits of invasive epilepsy surgery workup with implanted subdural and depth electrodes. Epilepsia. 2012;53(8):13221332.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    McGovern RA, Ruggieri P, Bulacio J, Risk analysis of hemorrhage in stereo-electroencephalography procedures. Epilepsia. 2019;60(3):571580.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Cossu M, Cardinale F, Castana L, Stereoelectroencephalography in the presurgical evaluation of focal epilepsy: a retrospective analysis of 215 procedures. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4):706718.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Tanriverdi T, Ajlan A, Poulin N, Olivier A. Morbidity in epilepsy surgery: an experience based on 2449 epilepsy surgery procedures from a single institution. J Neurosurg. 2009;110(6):11111123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 579 579 102
Full Text Views 47 47 10
PDF Downloads 31 31 10
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0