Combined and simultaneous endoscopic endonasal and transorbital surgery for a Meckel’s cave schwannoma: technical nuances of a mini-invasive, multiportal approach

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurological Surgery and
  • 2 Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Spain;
  • 3 Department of Neuroscience, “G. Rummo” Hospital, Benevento, Italy;
  • 4 Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona; and
  • 5 Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Over the years, Meckel’s cave pathologies have been judged off-limits because of high rates of morbidity. Even though several studies have defined various surgical routes with tolerable morbidity and mortality rates, controversies related to the optimal avenue to treat different categories of Meckel’s cave and cavernous sinus neoplasms persist.

With unceasing energy to cultivate minimally invasive neurosurgical approaches, the endoscopic endonasal route has been tested, and the approach effectively performed, to provide a valid surgical window to these areas. In this dynamic and challenging scenario, another ventral endoscopic minimally invasive route—that is, the superior eyelid endoscopic transorbital approach—has been very recently proposed, and used in selected cases, to access the cavernous sinus and Meckel’s cave regions.

METHODS

The authors report the technical nuances of a combined and simultaneous endoscopic endonasal and transorbital surgical treatment of a patient with a Meckel’s cave schwannoma. The operation involved collaboration among neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and ophthalmology (oculoplastic surgery). The patient recovered well, had no neurological deficits, and was discharged to home 3 days after surgery.

RESULTS

The multiportal combined route was proposed for the following reasons. The endonasal approach, considered to be more familiar to our skull base team, could allow control of possible damage of the internal carotid artery. From the endonasal perspective, the most inferior and medial portion of the tumor could be properly managed. Finally, the transorbital route, by means of opening the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus via the meningoorbital band, could allow control of the superolateral part of the tumor and, most importantly, could permit removal of the portion entering the posterior cranial fossa via the trigeminal pore. Simultaneous surgery with two surgical teams working together was planned in order to reduce operative time, hospital stay, and patient stress and discomfort, and to ensure “one-shot” complete tumor removal, with minimal or no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the translation into the real surgical setting of recent anatomical contributions related to the novel endoscopic transorbital approach and its simultaneous integration with the endoscopic endonasal pathway. Accordingly, it may pave the way for future applications related to minimally invasive, multiportal endoscopic surgery for skull base tumors.

ABBREVIATIONS ENT = ear, nose, and throat; GTR = gross-total resection; ICA = internal carotid artery; NTR = near-total resection.

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Data (PDF 1.83 MB)

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Alberto Di Somma: Institut Clínic de Neurociències (ICN), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Spain. adisomma@clinic.cat.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online July 10, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.4.JNS20707.

Disclosures Dr. Alobid reports being a consultant for Roche, Menarini, MSD, GSK, and Mylan. Dr. Di Somma reports being a consultant for Brainlab.

  • 1

    Akutsu H, Kreutzer J, Fahlbusch R, Buchfelder M. Transsphenoidal decompression of the sellar floor for cavernous sinus meningiomas: experience with 21 patients. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(1):5462.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Cusimano MD, Sekhar LN, Sen CN, The results of surgery for benign tumors of the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery. 1995;37(1):110.

  • 3

    O’Sullivan MG, van Loveren HR, Tew JM Jr. The surgical resectability of meningiomas of the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery. 1997;40(2):238247.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Ferreli F, Turri-Zanoni M, Canevari FR, Endoscopic endonasal management of non-functioning pituitary adenomas with cavernous sinus invasion: a 10- year experience. Rhinology. 2015;53(4):308316.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Sekhar LN, Sen CN, Jho HD, Janecka IP. Surgical treatment of intracavernous neoplasms: a four-year experience. Neurosurgery. 1989;24(1):1830.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Knosp E, Perneczky A, Koos WT, Meningiomas of the space of the cavernous sinus. Neurosurgery. 1996;38(3):434444.

  • 7

    Al-Mefty O. Supraorbital-pterional approach to skull base lesions. Neurosurgery. 1987;21(4):474477.

  • 8

    Hakuba A, Nishimura S, Shirakata S, Tsukamoto M. Surgical approaches to the cavernous sinus. Report of 19 cases (author’s transl). Article in Japanese. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1982;22(4):295308.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hakuba A, Tanaka K, Suzuki T, Nishimura S. A combined orbitozygomatic infratemporal epidural and subdural approach for lesions involving the entire cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg. 1989;71(5 pt 1):699704.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    al-Mefty O, Anand VK. Zygomatic approach to skull-base lesions. J Neurosurg. 1990;73(5):668673.

  • 11

    Frank G, Pasquini E. Endoscopic endonasal cavernous sinus surgery, with special reference to pituitary adenomas. Front Horm Res. 2006;34:6482.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Perneczky A, Knosp E, Matula C. Cavernous sinus surgery. Approach through the lateral wall. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1988;92(1-4):7682.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Frank G, Sciarretta V, Calbucci F, The endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach for the treatment of cranial base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(1)(suppl 1):ONS50ONS57.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Frank G, Pasquini E. Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cavernous sinus: surgical approaches. Neurosurgery. 2002;50(3):675.

  • 15

    Zoli M, Milanese L, Bonfatti R, Cavernous sinus invasion by pituitary adenomas: role of endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg Sci. 2016;60(4):485494.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Patrona A, Patel KS, Bander ED, Endoscopic endonasal surgery for nonadenomatous, nonmeningeal pathology involving the cavernous sinus. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(3):880888.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Wei W, Qiuhang Z, Hongchuan G, Zhenlin W. Endoscopic endonasal biopsy for a tumor at the cavernous sinus and pons. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(2):e90e92.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Jacquesson T, Berhouma M, Picart T, Jouanneau E. Total removal of a trigeminal schwannoma via the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach. Technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015;157(6):935938.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Dallan I, Sellari-Franceschini S, Turri-Zanoni M, Endoscopic transorbital superior eyelid approach for the management of selected spheno-orbital meningiomas: preliminary experience. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018;14(3):243251.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Lee MH, Hong SD, Woo KI, Endoscopic endonasal versus transorbital surgery for middle cranial fossa tumors: comparison of clinical outcomes based on surgical corridors. World Neurosurg. 2019;122:e1491e1504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Jeon C, Hong CK, Woo KI, Endoscopic transorbital surgery for Meckel’s cave and middle cranial fossa tumors: surgical technique and early results. J Neurosurg. 2019;131(4):11261135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Kong DS, Young SM, Hong CK, Clinical and ophthalmological outcome of endoscopic transorbital surgery for cranioorbital tumors. J Neurosurg. 2018;131(3):667675.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Goldberg RA, Shorr N, Arnold AC, Garcia GH. Deep transorbital approach to the apex and cavernous sinus. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;14(5):336341.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Di Somma A, Andaluz N, Cavallo LM, Endoscopic transorbital superior eyelid approach: anatomical study from a neurosurgical perspective. J Neurosurg. 2018;129(5):12031216.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Di Somma A, Andaluz N, Cavallo LM, Endoscopic transorbital route to the petrous apex: a feasibility anatomic study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160(4):707720.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Dallan I, Di Somma A, Prats-Galino A, Endoscopic transorbital route to the cavernous sinus through the meningo-orbital band: a descriptive anatomical study. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(3):622629.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Priddy BH, Nunes CF, Beer-Furlan A, A side door to Meckel’s cave: anatomic feasibility study for the lateral transorbital approach. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017;13(5):614621.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    de Lara D, Ditzel Filho LF, Prevedello DM, Endonasal endoscopic approaches to the paramedian skull base. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(6)(suppl):S121S129.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Fortes FS, Sennes LU, Carrau RL, Endoscopic anatomy of the pterygopalatine fossa and the transpterygoid approach: development of a surgical instruction model. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(1):4449.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Kaen A, Cárdenas Ruiz-Valdepeñas E, Di Somma A, Refining the anatomic boundaries of the endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach: the “VELPPHA area” concept. J Neurosurg. 2018;131(3):911919.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Goldberg RA, Kim AJ, Kerivan KM. The lacrimal keyhole, orbital door jamb, and basin of the inferior orbital fissure. Three areas of deep bone in the lateral orbit. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(12):16181624.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Wang WH, Lieber S, Lan MY, Nasopharyngeal muscle patch for the management of internal carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg. Published online October 18, 2019 doi:10.3171/2019.7.JNS191370

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Jankowitz BT. Management of major vascular injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2016;49(3):819828.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Zhang Y, Tian Z, Li C, A modified endovascular treatment protocol for iatrogenic internal carotid artery injuries following endoscopic endonasal surgery. J Neurosurg. 2019;132(2):343350.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Ruggeri A, Enseñat J, Prats-Galino A, Endoscopic endonasal control of the paraclival internal carotid artery by Fogarty balloon catheter inflation: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(3):872879.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Park J, Son W, Kwak Y, Ohk B. Pterional versus superciliary keyhole approach: direct comparison of approach-related complaints and satisfaction in the same patient. J Neurosurg. 2018;130(1):220226.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Almeida JP, Omay SB, Shetty SR, Transorbital endoscopic eyelid approach for resection of sphenoorbital meningiomas with predominant hyperostosis: report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(6):18851895.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    Cavallo LM, Solari D, Cappabianca P. Multiportal approach to the skull base: one key, multiple gates. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(3):630631.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Ciporen JN, Moe KS, Ramanathan D, Multiportal endoscopic approaches to the central skull base: a cadaveric study. World Neurosurg. 2010;73(6):705712.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Dallan I, Castelnuovo P, Locatelli D, Multiportal combined transorbital transnasal endoscopic approach for the management of selected skull base lesions: preliminary experience. World Neurosurg. 2015;84(1):97107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Tham T, Costantino P, Bruni M, Multiportal combined transorbital and transnasal endoscopic resection of fibrous dysplasia. J Neurol Surg Rep. 2015;76(2):e291e296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Stenin I, Hansen S, Becker M, Minimally invasive multiport surgery of the lateral skull base. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:379295.

  • 43

    Park HH, Hong SD, Kim YH, Endoscopic transorbital and endonasal approach for trigeminal schwannomas: a retrospective multicenter analysis (KOSEN-005). J Neurosurg. 2020;133(2):467476

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Raza SM, Donaldson AM, Mehta A, Surgical management of trigeminal schwannomas: defining the role for endoscopic endonasal approaches. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(4):E17.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Shin SS, Gardner PA, Stefko ST, Endoscopic endonasal approach for nonvestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(5):10461057.

  • 46

    Yang L, Hu L, Zhao W, Endoscopic endonasal approach for trigeminal schwannomas: our experience of 39 patients in 10 years. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(3):735741.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47

    Zoli M, Ratti S, Guaraldi F, Endoscopic endonasal approach to primitive Meckel’s cave tumors: a clinical series. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160(12):23492361.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48

    Zhang Q, Feng K, Ge C, Endoscopic endonasal management of trigeminal schwannomas extending into the infratemporal fossa. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(6):862865.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49

    Wu X, Xie SH, Tang B, Single-stage endoscopic endonasal approach for the complete removal of trigeminal schwannomas occupying both the middle and posterior fossae. Neurosurg Rev. Published online February 19, 2020. doi:10.1007/s10143-020-01266-7

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50

    Janakiram TN, Bhatia Sharma S, Nahata Gattani V. Multiport combined endoscopic approach to nonembolized juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma with parapharyngeal extension: an emerging concept. Int J Otolaryngol. 2016;2016:4203160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51

    Ramakrishna R, Kim LJ, Bly RA, Transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery for the treatment of skull base lesions. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;24:99104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52

    Rutka JT. Editorial. Classes of evidence in neurosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(6):17471748.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 422 422 234
Full Text Views 45 45 24
PDF Downloads 34 34 19
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0