Development and clinical validation of a grading system for pituitary adenoma consistency

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurological Surgery,
  • 2 Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, and
  • 3 Department of Radiology, Keck Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Pituitary adenoma (PA) consistency, or texture, is an important intraoperative characteristic that may dictate operative dissection techniques and/or instruments used for tumor removal during endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs). The impact of PA consistency on surgical outcomes has yet to be elucidated.

METHODS

The authors developed an objective 5-point grading scale for PA consistency based on intraoperative characteristics, including ease of tumor debulking, manipulation, and instrument selection, ranging from cystic/hemorrhagic tumors (grade 1) to calcified tumors (grade 5). The proposed grading system was prospectively assessed in 306 consecutive patients who underwent an EEA for PAs, and who were subsequently analyzed for associations with surgical outcomes, including extent of resection (EOR) and complication profiles.

RESULTS

Institutional database review identified 306 patients who underwent intraoperative assessment of PA consistency, of which 96% were macroadenomas, 70% had suprasellar extension, and 44% had cavernous sinus invasion (CSI). There were 214 (69.9%) nonfunctional PAs and 92 functional PAs (31.1%). Distribution of scores included 15 grade 1 tumors (4.9%), 112 grade 2 tumors (36.6%), 125 grade 3 tumors (40.8%), 52 grade 4 tumors (17%), and 2 grade 5 tumors (0.7%). Compared to grade 1/2 and grade 3 PAs, grade 4/5 PAs were significantly larger (22.5 vs 26.6 vs 27.4 mm, p < 0.01), more likely to exhibit CSI (39% vs 42% vs 59%, p < 0.05), and trended toward nonfunctionality (67% vs 68% vs 82%, p = 0.086). Although there was no association between PA consistency and preoperative headaches or visual dysfunction, grade 4/5 PAs trended toward preoperative (p = 0.058) and postoperative panhypopituitarism (p = 0.066). Patients with preoperative visual dysfunction experienced greater improvement if they had a grade 1/2 PA (p < 0.05). Intraoperative CSF leaks were noted in 32% of cases and were more common with higher-consistency-grade tumors (p = 0.048), although this difference did not translate to postoperative CSF leaks. Gross-total resection (%) was more likely with lower PA consistency score as follows: grade 1/2 (60%), grade 3 (50%), grade 4/5 (44%; p = 0.045). Extracapsular techniques were almost exclusively performed in grade 4/5 PAs. Assignment of scores showed low variance and high reproducibility, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.905 (95% CI 0.815–0.958), indicating excellent interrater reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate clinical validity of the proposed intraoperative grading scale with respect to PA subtype, neuroimaging features, EOR, and endocrine complications. Future studies will assess the relation of PA consistency to preoperative MRI findings to accurately predict consistency, thereby allowing the surgeon to tailor the exposure and prepare for varying resection strategies.

ABBREVIATIONS CSI = cavernous sinus invasion; DI = diabetes insipidus; EEA = endoscopic endonasal approach; EOR = extent of resection; GH = growth hormone; GTR = gross-total resection; IGF = insulin-like growth factor; PA = pituitary adenoma; USC = University of Southern California.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Martin J. Rutkowski: University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. martin.rutkowski@gmail.com.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online June 5, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.4.JNS193288.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

  • 1

    Juraschka K, Khan OH, Godoy BL, Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to large and giant pituitary adenomas: institutional experience and predictors of extent of resection. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(1):7583.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2008;33:151199.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    de Divitiis E, Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Esposito F. Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for the removal of suprasellar tumors: Part 2. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(1):4659.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Theodosopoulos PV, Leach J, Kerr RG, Maximizing the extent of tumor resection during transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary macroadenomas: can endoscopy replace intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging? J Neurosurg. 2010;112(4):736743.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Yamamoto J, Kakeda S, Shimajiri S, Tumor consistency of pituitary macroadenomas: predictive analysis on the basis of imaging features with contrast-enhanced 3D FIESTA at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(2):297303.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Pierallini A, Caramia F, Falcone C, Pituitary macroadenomas: preoperative evaluation of consistency with diffusion-weighted MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology. 2006;239(1):223231.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Yao A, Pain M, Balchandani P, Shrivastava RK. Can MRI predict meningioma consistency?: a correlation with tumor pathology and systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2018;41(3):745753.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Zeynalova A, Kocak B, Durmaz ES, Preoperative evaluation of tumour consistency in pituitary macroadenomas: a machine learning-based histogram analysis on conventional T2-weighted MRI. Neuroradiology. 2019;61(7):767774.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery. 1993;33(4):610618.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Badie B, Brooks N, Souweidane MM. Endoscopic and minimally invasive microsurgical approaches for treating brain tumor patients. J Neurooncol. 2004;69(1–3):209219.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Jankowski R, Auque J, Simon C, Endoscopic pituitary tumor surgery. Laryngoscope. 1992;102(2):198202.

  • 12

    Snow RB, Lavyne MH, Lee BC, Craniotomy versus transsphenoidal excision of large pituitary tumors: the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in guiding the operative approach. Neurosurgery. 1986;19(1):5964.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Itamura K, Chang K-E, Lucas J, Prospective clinical validation of a meningioma consistency grading scheme: association with surgical outcomes and extent of tumor resection. J Neurosurg. 2019;131(5):13561360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Zada G, Yashar P, Robison A, A proposed grading system for standardizing tumor consistency of intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(6):E1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Jagannathan J, Smith R, DeVroom HL, Outcome of using the histological pseudocapsule as a surgical capsule in Cushing disease. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(3):531539.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Kawamata T, Kubo O, Hori T. Surgical removal of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas with intensive microsurgical pseudocapsule resection results in complete remission of acromegaly. Neurosurg Rev. 2005;28(3):201208.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Kim EH, Ku CR, Lee EJ, Kim SH. Extracapsular en bloc resection in pituitary adenoma surgery. Pituitary. 2015;18(3):397404.

  • 18

    Monteith SJ, Starke RM, Jane JA Jr, Oldfield EH. Use of the histological pseudocapsule in surgery for Cushing disease: rapid postoperative cortisol decline predicting complete tumor resection. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(4):721727.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Xie T, Liu T, Zhang X, Time to revive the value of the pseudocapsule in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for growth hormone adenomas. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:6571.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Thotakura AK, Patibandla MR, Panigrahi MK, Mahadevan A. Is it really possible to predict the consistency of a pituitary adenoma preoperatively? Neurochirurgie. 2017;63(6):453457.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Jahangiri A, Wagner JR, Chin AT, Incidence of headache as a presenting complaint in over 1000 patients with sellar lesions and factors predicting postoperative improvement. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015;132:1620.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Wolf A, Goncalves S, Salehi F, Quantitative evaluation of headache severity before and after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(6):16271633.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Yagnik G, Rutowski MJ, Shah SS, Aghi MK. Stratifying nonfunctional pituitary adenomas into two groups distinguished by macrophage subtypes. Oncotarget. 2019;10(22):22122223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Zada G, Lin N, Laws ER Jr. Patterns of extrasellar extension in growth hormone-secreting and nonfunctional pituitary macroadenomas. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29(4):E4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Wei L, Lin SA, Fan K, Relationship between pituitary adenoma texture and collagen content revealed by comparative study of MRI and pathology analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):1289812905.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Little KM, Friedman AH, Sampson JH, Surgical management of petroclival meningiomas: defining resection goals based on risk of neurological morbidity and tumor recurrence rates in 137 patients. Neurosurgery. 2005;56(3):546559.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Sitthinamsuwan B, Khampalikit I, Nunta-aree S, Predictors of meningioma consistency: a study in 243 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(8):13831389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Stafford SL, Perry A, Suman VJ, Primarily resected meningiomas: outcome and prognostic factors in 581 Mayo Clinic patients, 1978 through 1988. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998;73:936942.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Hughes JD, Fattahi N, Van Gompel J, Magnetic resonance elastography detects tumoral consistency in pituitary macroadenomas. Pituitary. 2016;19(3):286292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Sanei Taheri M, Kimia F, Mehrnahad M, Accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging-magnetic resonance in differentiating functional from non-functional pituitary macro-adenoma and classification of tumor consistency. Neuroradiol J. 2019;32(2):7485.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Smith KA, Leever JD, Chamoun RB. Prediction of consistency of pituitary adenomas by magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2015;76(5):340343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 584 584 297
Full Text Views 94 94 60
PDF Downloads 76 76 47
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0